Channel and feature selection for a surface electromyographic pattern recognition task

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 5190-5200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iker Mesa ◽  
Angel Rubio ◽  
Imanol Tubia ◽  
Joaquin De No ◽  
Javier Diaz
2007 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bozena M. Lukasiak ◽  
Simeone Zomer ◽  
Richard G. Brereton ◽  
Rita Faria ◽  
John C. Duncan

2012 ◽  
Vol 195-196 ◽  
pp. 402-406
Author(s):  
Xue Qin Chen ◽  
Rui Ping Wang

Classify the electrocardiogram (ECG) into different pathophysiological categories is a complex pattern recognition task which has been tried in lots of methods. This paper will discuss a method of principal component analysis (PCA) in exacting the heartbeat features, and a new method of classification that is to calculate the error between the testing heartbeat and reconstructed heartbeat. Training and testing heartbeat is taken from the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database, in which 8 types of arrhythmia signals are selected in this paper. The true positive rate (TPR) is 83%.


1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ina M. Tarkka ◽  
Luis F. H. Basile

This study was an attempt to replicate recent magnetoencephalographic (MEG) findings on human task-specific CNV sources (Basile et al., Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 90, 1994, 157–165) by means of a spatio-temporal electric source localization method (Scherg and von Cramon, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 62, 1985, 32–44; Scherg and von Cramon, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 65, 1986, 344-360; Scherg and Berg, Brain Electric Source Analysis Handbook, Version 2). The previous MEG results showed CNV sources in the prefrontal cortex of the two hemispheres for two tasks used, namely visual pattern recognition and visual spatial recognition tasks. In the right hemisphere, the sources were more anterior and inferior for the spatial recognition task than for the pattern recognition task. In the present study we obtained CNVs in five subjects during two tasks identical to the MEG study. The elicited electric potentials were modeled with four spatio-temporal dipoles for each task, three of which accounted for the visual evoked response and one that accounted for the CNV. For all subjects the dipole explaining the CNV was always localized in the frontal region of the head, however, the dipole obtained during the visual spatial recognition task was more anterior than the one obtained during the pattern recognition task. Thus, task-specific CNV sources were again observed, although the stable model consisted of only one dipole located close to the midline instead of one dipole in each hemisphere. This was a major difference in the CNV sources between the previous MEG and the present electric source analysis results. We discuss the possible basis for the difference between the two methods used to study slow brain activity that is believed to originate from extended cortical patches.


Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarra Houidi ◽  
Dominique Fourer ◽  
François Auger

Since decades past, time–frequency (TF) analysis has demonstrated its capability to efficiently handle non-stationary multi-component signals which are ubiquitous in a large number of applications. TF analysis us allows to estimate physics-related meaningful parameters (e.g., F0, group delay, etc.) and can provide sparse signal representations when a suitable tuning of the method parameters is used. On another hand, deep learning with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) is the current state-of-the-art approach for pattern recognition and allows us to automatically extract relevant signal features despite the fact that the trained models can suffer from a lack of interpretability. Hence, this paper proposes to combine together these two approaches to take benefit of their respective advantages and addresses non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM) which consists of identifying a home electrical appliance (HEA) from its measured energy consumption signal as a “toy” problem. This study investigates the role of the TF representation when synchrosqueezed or not, used as the input of a 2D CNN applied to a pattern recognition task. We also propose a solution for interpreting the information conveyed by the trained CNN through different neural architecture by establishing a link with our previously proposed “handcrafted” interpretable features thanks to the layer-wise relevant propagation (LRP) method. Our experiments on the publicly available PLAID dataset show excellent appliance recognition results (accuracy above 97%) using the suitable TF representation and allow an interpretation of the trained model.


Author(s):  
Peter Grabusts

Potential function method was originally offered to solve the pattern recognition tasks, then it was generalized to a wider range of tasks, which were associated with the function approximation. Potential function method algorithms are based on the hypothesis of the nature of the function that separates sets according to different classes of patterns. Geometrical interpretation of pattern recognition task includes display of patterns in the form of vector in the space of input signal that allows to perceive the learning as approximation task. The paper describes the essence of potential function method and the learning procedure is shown that is based on practical application of potential methods. Pattern recognition applications with the help of examples of potential functions and company bankruptcy data analysis with the help of potential functions are given.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document