High-Dose Salvage Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy With or Without Androgen Deprivation After Radical Prostatectomy for Rising or Persisting Prostate-Specific Antigen: 5-Year Results

Abstract BACKGROUND Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations after radical prostatectomy typically become undetectable with the use of current immunometric assay methods. Despite modern surgical techniques, 15%–30% of prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy develop a biochemical recurrence during follow-up. Unfortunately, poor analytical sensitivity of standard PSA assays delays biochemical recurrence detection, and because of day-to-day assay imprecision ultrasensitive PSA assays cannot assess PSA kinetics. We developed an immuno-PCR assay for total PSA that has a limit of quantification >10 times lower than current ultrasensitive assays. METHODS The 2-site immunometric assay for total PSA employed 2 monoclonal antibodies, one conjugated to a double-stranded DNA label and the other bound to paramagnetic microparticles. After several washing steps, quantification cycles were determined and values were converted to PSA concentrations. We characterized analytical performance and compared accuracy with a commercially available total PSA assay. RESULTS The limit of quantification was 0.65 ng/L and the assay was linear in the range of 0.25–152.0 ng/L. Total imprecision estimates at PSA concentrations of 3.8, 24.1, and 69.1 ng/L were <15.2%, <9.4%, and <10.6%, respectively. Recovery of supplemented PSA ranged from 87.5% to 119.2% (mean 100.3%). Dilution recovery ranged from 96.4% to 115.3% (mean 102.3%). There was no high-dose hook effect up to 50 000 ng/L of PSA. Comparison with the commercial PSA assay showed a regression slope of 1.06 and a correlation coefficient of 0.996. CONCLUSIONS The analytical characteristics of the assay support the use of this assay for the accurate and precise measurement of serum PSA, even at sub–nanogram-per-liter concentrations.

Download Full-text

Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy and High-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Relatively Young Patients with Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Adenocarcinoma

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13071517 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (7) ◽

pp. 1517

Author(s):

Szu-Yuan Wu ◽

Shyh-Chyi Chang ◽

Chang-I Chen ◽

Chung-Chien Huang

Keyword(s):

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽

Young Men ◽

Dose Intensity ◽

Oncologic Outcomes ◽

High Dose ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Short Term ◽

Intensity Modulated ◽

High Dose Intensity

Purpose: To estimate the oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) and high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with short-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in relatively young men with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN-UIR-PC). Patients and Methods: We enrolled relatively young men (≤65 years) from the Taiwan Cancer Registry who had been diagnosed as having NCCN-UIR-PC and who had received RP or high-dose IMRT (at least ≥72 Gy) with short-term ADT (4–6 months). After propensity score matching of the confounders, Cox proportional regression was used to model the time from the index date (i.e., date of diagnosis) to all-cause death, biochemical failure (BF), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM). Results: The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of the risk of all-cause death, BF, LRR, and DM were 2.76 (1.36–5.60, p = 0.0050), 2.74 (1.72–4.84, p < 0.0001), 1.28 (1.09–1.90, p = 0.0324), and 2.11 (1.40–4.88, p = 0.0052), respectively. Conclusions: RP is superior to high-dose IMRT with short-term ADT in terms of oncologic outcomes for relatively young men with UIR-PC.

Download Full-text

Adjuvant high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: Updated 5-year results.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.29.7_suppl.69 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 69-69

Author(s):

P. Ost ◽

B. De Potter ◽

A. Beerens ◽

N. Lumen ◽

V. Fonteyne ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Seminal Vesicle ◽

Gleason Score ◽

Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽

High Dose ◽

Median Dose ◽

Seminal Vesicle Invasion ◽

Intensity Modulated ◽

Gi Toxicity ◽

Grade 3

69 Background: Approximately 25% of patients treated with immediate post-prostatectomy (adjuvant) radiotherapy will develop a biochemical failure within 5 years after radiotherapy when doses of 60-64 Gy are used. We wanted to report on the safety and biochemical outcome of adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (AIMRT) with a median dose of 74 Gy. Methods: Between 1999 and 2008, 104 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy followed by AIMRT +/− androgen deprivation (AD). Indications for AIMRT were capsule perforation, seminal vesicle invasion and/or positive surgical margins at prostatectomy specimen. All patients were irradiated at a single tertiary academic centre. AD was initiated in 65% of the patients on the basis of seminal vesicles invasion, pre-prostatectomy PSA > 20ng/mL, Gleason score ≥ 4+3 or personal preference of the referring urologist. A median dose of 74 Gy was prescribed to the planning target volume using IMRT in all patients. AD consisted out of a LHRH analogue for 6 months. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to examine the influence of patient- and treatment-related factors on bRFS. Results: The median follow-up was 5 years. Late toxicity: no patients developed grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Grade 2 GI toxicity was seen in 8%. Seven patients (7%) and 24 (23%) developed grade 3 and 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity, respectively. An urethral stricture was observed in 8 patients (8%). The 3- and 5-year actuarial bRFS was 91% and 85%, respectively. On univariate analysis bRFS rates was reduced with seminal vesicle invasion (p < 0.04) or Gleason score ≥ 4+3 (p < 0.02) or negative margins (p < 0.001). AD and preoperative PSA levels did not influence bRFS. None of the variables remained significant on multivariate analysis.Eight patients had a distant clinical relapse (pelvic lymph nodes: 3, bone metastases: 3 and 2 patients had both). Seven patients died (3 prostate cancer related deaths). Conclusions: Adjuvant high-dose IMRT after prostatectomy is safe. Five-year bRFS is excellent. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text