Modeling mortality of second-rotation loblolly pine plantations in the Piedmont/Upper Coastal Plain and Lower Coastal Plain of the southern United States

2007 ◽  
Vol 252 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 132-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dehai Zhao ◽  
Bruce Borders ◽  
Mingliang Wang ◽  
Michael Kane
2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 161-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huei-Jin Wang ◽  
Philip J. Radtke ◽  
Stephen P. Prisley

Abstract Broad-scale estimates of coarse woody debris (CWD) yield across landscapes are somewhat rare, despite the importance of CWD in ecosystem functioning and its potential role in terrestrial carbon cycles. Yields of CWD were estimated at regional scales by linking a stand-level predictive model with regional forest inventory data for 11 states in the southern United States. We estimated that the accumulation of CWD in late-rotation loblolly pine plantations across the South totals 48.67 million metric tons of dry wood necromass, the carbon equivalent of 24.33 million metric tons. This represents annual CO2 emissions of 21 coal-fired power plants, or the amount of carbon sequestered each year in 7 million ha of pine forests. Confidence intervals for CWD dry weight per hectare generally did not exceed ±25% of the estimated values. Although county-level estimates were of higher uncertainty, the spatial pattern appeared to be relatively consistent with the extent of loblolly pine, with low yields near the extremes of the species' natural range and high yields in extensively forested portions of its range. Quantifying regional carbon stores of CWD with respect to stand-level management activities may improve accuracy of regional estimates and provide further insight into management effects on the carbon pool and the carbon cycle.


2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Fox ◽  
H. Lee Allen ◽  
Timothy J. Albaugh ◽  
Rafael Rubilar ◽  
Colleen A. Carlson

Abstract The growth of many pine plantations in the southern United States is limited by soil nutrient availability. Therefore, forest fertilization is a common silvicultural practice throughout the South. Approximately 1.2 million ac of pine plantations were fertilized in 2004. In the last 10 years, considerable advances have been made in identifying the ecophysiological basis for stand growth and the response to fertilizer additions. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are the nutrients that most commonly limit growth of southern pine. On wet clay soils in the lower Coastal Plain and on some well-drained soil in the upper Coastal Plain, severe P deficiencies exist. On these soils, P fertilization with 25–50 lb of P per acre at the time of planting produces a large and sustained growth response, on the order of 50 ft3 ac−1 yr−1 (1.5 tn ac−1 yr−1) throughout the rotation. On most other soils in the South, chronic deficiencies of both N and P exist. On these sites, soil nutrient availability often is adequate early in the rotation when tree demand is small. However, around the time of crown closure, N and P frequently become limiting. Fertilization with both N and P in these intermediate aged stands typically increases growth for 8–10 years. The growth response to a combination of 25 lb of P per acre plus 200 lb of N per acre averages around 55 ft3 ac−1 yr−1 (1.6 tn ac−1 yr−1) for an 8-year period. The amount of leaf area in the stand is the main factor determining the current growth rate of the stand and the potential growth response after fertilization. When stand leaf area index is less than 3.5, light capture by the stand is restricted and growth is negatively affected. In many of these stands, fertilization will increase leaf area because of increased soil nutrient availability and thus increase growth. The financial return after fertilization depends on the growth response that occurs, the cost of the fertilizer treatment, and the stumpage value of the timber produced. Using a growth response of 55 ft3 ac−1 yr−1 over 8 years, a fertilizer cost of $90 ac−1, and stumpage values from the first quarter of 2006, the internal rate of return from midrotation fertilization of a loblolly pine plantation with N and P would be approximately 16%.


2016 ◽  
Vol 375 ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dehai Zhao ◽  
Michael Kane ◽  
Robert Teskey ◽  
Thomas R. Fox ◽  
Timothy J. Albaugh ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 259 (7) ◽  
pp. 1299-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Sun ◽  
A. Noormets ◽  
M.J. Gavazzi ◽  
S.G. McNulty ◽  
J. Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document