Comparison of porcine organs and commonly used ballistic simulants when subjected to impact from steel spheres fired at supersonic velocities

2018 ◽  
Vol 288 ◽  
pp. 123-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Humphrey ◽  
Maciej Henneberg ◽  
Christian Wachsberger ◽  
Jaliya Kumaratilake
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahar Cohen ◽  
Shirly Partouche ◽  
Michael Gurevich ◽  
Vladimir Tennak ◽  
Vadym Mezhybovsky ◽  
...  

AbstractWhole organ perfusion decellularization has been proposed as a promising method to generate non-immunogenic organs from allogeneic and xenogeneic donors. However, the ability to recellularize organ scaffolds with multiple patient-specific cells in a spatially controlled manner remains challenging. Here, we propose that replacing donor endothelial cells alone, while keeping the rest of the organ viable and functional, is more technically feasible, and may offer a significant shortcut in the efforts to engineer transplantable organs. Vascular decellularization was achieved ex vivo, under controlled machine perfusion conditions, in various rat and porcine organs, including the kidneys, liver, lungs, heart, aorta, hind limbs, and pancreas. In addition, vascular decellularization of selected organs was performed in situ, within the donor body, achieving better control over the perfusion process. Human placenta-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were used as immunologically-acceptable human cells to repopulate the luminal surface of de-endothelialized aorta (in vitro), kidneys, lungs and hind limbs (ex vivo). This study provides evidence that artificially generating vascular chimerism is feasible and could potentially pave the way for crossing the immunological barrier to xenotransplantation, as well as reducing the immunological burden of allogeneic grafts.


2017 ◽  
Vol 377 (19) ◽  
pp. 1891-1893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Denner
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Anacleto ◽  
F. A. Brito ◽  
E. Passos

Metallurgist ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 572-574
Author(s):  
S. Venetskii

Author(s):  
FREEMAN K. HILL ◽  
RALPH A. ALPHER

Author(s):  
Shosaburo Oyama ◽  
Takashi Nonaka ◽  
Keitaro Matsumoto ◽  
Daisuke Taniguchi ◽  
Yasumasa Hashimoto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hemostasis is very important for a safe surgery, particularly in endoscopic surgery. Accordingly, in the last decade, vessel-sealing systems became popular as hemostatic devices. However, their use is limited due to thermal damage to organs, such as intestines and nerves. We developed a new method for safe coagulation using a vessel-sealing system, termed flat coagulation (FC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this new FC method compared to conventional coagulation methods. Methods We evaluated the thermal damage caused by various energy devices, such as the vessel-sealing system (FC method using LigaSure™), ultrasonic scissors (Sonicision™), and monopolar electrosurgery (cut/coagulation/spray/soft coagulation (SC) mode), on porcine organs, including the small intestine and liver. Furthermore, we compared the hemostasis time between the FC method and conventional methods in the superficial bleeding model using porcine mesentery. Results FC caused less thermal damage than monopolar electrosurgery’s SC mode in the porcine liver and small intestine (liver: mean depth of thermal damage, 1.91 ± 0.35 vs 3.37 ± 0.28 mm; p = 0.0015). In the superficial bleeding model, the hemostasis time of FC was significantly shorter than that of electrosurgery’s SC mode (mean, 19.54 ± 22.51 s vs 44.99 ± 21.18 s; p = 0.0046). Conclusion This study showed that the FC method caused less thermal damage to porcine small intestine and liver than conventional methods. This FC method could provide easier and faster coagulation of superficial bleeds compared to that achieved by electrosurgery’s SC mode. Therefore, this study motivates for the use of this new method to achieve hemostasis with various types of bleeds involving internal organs during endoscopic surgeries.


1989 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-26
Author(s):  
V. G. Zil'berberg ◽  
A. I. Stroganov ◽  
N. I. Kirkun ◽  
A. M. Vyal'tsev ◽  
V. Yu. Shestopalov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document