scholarly journals Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 87-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward P. Washabaugh ◽  
Tarun Kalyanaraman ◽  
Peter G. Adamczyk ◽  
Edward S. Claflin ◽  
Chandramouli Krishnan
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Measurement Units

scholarly journals Accuracy and Repeatability of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Measured with an Inertial Measurement Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1804
Author(s):  
Jorge Posada-Ordax ◽  
Julia Cosin-Matamoros ◽  
Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias ◽  
Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo ◽  
Laura Esteban-Gonzalo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
High Speeds ◽  
Controlled Conditions ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Accuracy And Repeatability

In recent years, interest in finding alternatives for the evaluation of mobility has increased. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) stand out for their portability, size, and low price. The objective of this study was to examine the accuracy and repeatability of a commercially available IMU under controlled conditions in healthy subjects. A total of 36 subjects, including 17 males and 19 females were analyzed with a Wiva Science IMU in a corridor test while walking for 10 m and in a threadmill at 1.6 km/h, 2.4 km/h, 3.2 km/h, 4 km/h, and 4.8 km/h for one minute. We found no difference when we compared the variables at 4 km/h and 4.8 km/h. However, we found greater differences and errors at 1.6 km/h, 2.4 km/h and 3.2 km/h, and the latter one (1.6 km/h) generated more error. The main conclusion is that the Wiva Science IMU is reliable at high speeds but loses reliability at low speeds.

Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters using inertial measurement units in neurological populations

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 558-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Esser ◽  
Helen Dawes ◽  
Johnny Collett ◽  
Max G. Feltham ◽  
Ken Howells
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Spatio Temporal

scholarly journals Effect of IMU Design on IMU-Derived Stride Metrics for Running

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 2601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael V Potter ◽  
Lauro V Ojeda ◽  
Noel C Perkins ◽  
Stephen M Cain
Keyword(s):  
Angular Velocity ◽  
Stride Length ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Sampling Frequency ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Running Speed ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Human Running

Researchers employ foot-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs) to estimate the three-dimensional trajectory of the feet as well as a rich array of gait parameters. However, the accuracy of those estimates depends critically on the limitations of the accelerometers and angular velocity gyros embedded in the IMU design. In this study, we reveal the effects of accelerometer range, gyro range, and sampling frequency on gait parameters (e.g., distance traveled, stride length, and stride angle) estimated using the zero-velocity update (ZUPT) method. The novelty and contribution of this work are that it: (1) quantifies these effects at mean speeds commensurate with competitive distance running (up to 6.4 m/s); (2) identifies the root causes of inaccurate foot trajectory estimates obtained from the ZUPT method; and (3) offers important engineering recommendations for selecting accurate IMUs for studying human running. The results demonstrate that the accuracy of the estimated gait parameters generally degrades with increased mean running speed and with decreased accelerometer range, gyro range, and sampling frequency. In particular, the saturation of the accelerometer and/or gyro induced during running for some IMU designs may render those designs highly inaccurate for estimating gait parameters.

scholarly journals Analysis of ergonomic and unergonomic human lifting behaviors by using Inertial Measurement Units

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Kuschan ◽  
Henning Schmidt ◽  
Jörg Krüger
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Angular Velocity ◽  
Musculoskeletal System ◽  
Occupational Diseases ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Main Components

Abstract:This paper presents an analysis of two distinct human lifting movements regarding acceleration and angular velocity. For the first movement, the ergonomic one, the test persons produced the lifting power by squatting down, bending at the hips and knees only. Whereas performing the unergonomic one they bent forward lifting the box mainly with their backs. The measurements were taken by using a vest equipped with five Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) with 9 Dimensions of Freedom (DOF) each. In the following the IMU data captured for these two movements will be evaluated using statistics and visualized. It will also be discussed with respect to their suitability as features for further machine learning classifications. The reason for observing these movements is that occupational diseases of the musculoskeletal system lead to a reduction of the workers’ quality of life and extra costs for companies. Therefore, a vest, called CareJack, was designed to give the worker a real-time feedback about his ergonomic state while working. The CareJack is an approach to reduce the risk of spinal and back diseases. This paper will also present the idea behind it as well as its main components.

scholarly journals Inertial measurement units to estimate drag forces and power output during standardised wheelchair tennis coast-down and sprint tests

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Thomas Rietveld ◽  
Barry S. Mason ◽  
Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey ◽  
Lucas H. V. van der Woude ◽  
Sonja de Groot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Output ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Drag Forces ◽  
Measurement Units
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document