Homing endonuclease genes: the rise and fall and rise again of a selfish element

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 609-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Burt ◽  
Vassiliki Koufopanou
2013 ◽  
Vol 280 (1770) ◽  
pp. 20131875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulina Giraldo-Perez ◽  
Matthew R. Goddard

Selfish genes demonstrate transmission bias and invade sexual populations despite conferring no benefit to their hosts. While the molecular genetics and evolutionary dynamics of selfish genes are reasonably well characterized, their effects on hosts are not. Homing endonuclease genes (HEGs) are one well-studied family of selfish genes that are assumed to be benign. However, we show that carrying HEGs is costly for Saccharomyces cerevisiae , demonstrating that these genetic elements are not necessarily benign but maybe parasitic. We estimate a selective load of approximately 1–2% in ‘natural’ niches. The second aspect we examine is the ability of HEGs to affect hosts' sexual behaviour. As all selfish genes critically rely on sex for spread, then any selfish gene correlated with increased host sexuality will enjoy a transmission advantage. While classic parasites are known to manipulate host behaviour, we are not aware of any evidence showing a selfish gene is capable of affecting host promiscuity. The data presented here show a selfish element may increase the propensity of its eukaryote host to undergo sex and along with increased rates of non-Mendelian inheritance, this may counterbalance mitotic selective load and promote spread. Demonstration that selfish genes are correlated with increased promiscuity in eukaryotes connects with ideas suggesting that selfish genes promoted the evolution of sex initially.


2000 ◽  
Vol 300 (4) ◽  
pp. 889-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Ichiyanagi ◽  
Yoshizumi Ishino ◽  
Mariko Ariyoshi ◽  
Kayoko Komori ◽  
Kosuke Morikawa

Biochemistry ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (51) ◽  
pp. 15895-15900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Schöttler ◽  
Wolfgang Wende ◽  
Vera Pingoud ◽  
Alfred Pingoud
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 297 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heejin Bae ◽  
Kee Pum Kim ◽  
Jung Min Song ◽  
Jun-Hwan Kim ◽  
Joo-Sung Yang ◽  
...  

Sociology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 003803852110331
Author(s):  
Leah Gilman

Multiple sociological studies have demonstrated how talk of ‘good’ motives enables people to maintain the presentation of a moral self in the context of stigmatised behaviours. Far fewer have examined why people sometimes describe acting for the ‘wrong reasons’ or choose to qualify, or reject, assumptions that they are motivated by a desire to ‘do good’. In this article, I analyse one such situation: sperm donors who describe being partially motivated by a ‘selfish’ desire to procreate, a motive which these same men frame as morally questionable. I argue that such accounts are explicable if we consider the (gendered) interactional and cultural contexts in which they are produced, particularly the way interactive contexts shape the desirability and achievability of plausibility and authenticity. I suggest that analysis of similar social phenomena can support sociologists in better understanding the complex ways in which moral practices are woven into social interactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document