Mental illness and health care use: a study among new neurological patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Steen Hansen ◽  
Per Fink ◽  
Lene Søndergaard ◽  
Morten Frydenberg
2021 ◽  
pp. 070674372110048
Author(s):  
Claire de Oliveira ◽  
Luke Mondor ◽  
Walter P. Wodchis ◽  
Laura C. Rosella

Introduction: Previous research has shown that the socioeconomic status (SES)–health gradient also extends to high-cost patients; however, little work has examined high-cost patients with mental illness and/or addiction. The objective of this study was to examine associations between individual-, household- and area-level SES factors and future high-cost use among these patients. Methods: We linked survey data from adult participants (ages 18 and older) of 3 cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey to administrative health care data from Ontario, Canada. Respondents with mental illness and/or addiction were identified based on prior mental health and addiction health care use and followed for 5 years for which we ascertained health care costs covered under the public health care system. We quantified associations between SES factors and becoming a high-cost patient (i.e., transitioning into the top 5%) using logistic regression models. For ordinal SES factors, such as income, education and marginalization variables, we measured absolute and relative inequalities using the slope and relative index of inequality. Results: Among our sample, lower personal income (odds ratio [ OR] = 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54 to 2.88, for CAD$0 to CAD$14,999), lower household income ( OR = 2.11, 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.99, for lowest income quintile), food insecurity ( OR = 1.87, 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.55) and non-homeownership ( OR = 1.34, 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.66), at the individual and household levels, respectively, and higher residential instability (OR = 1.72, 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.42, for most marginalized), at the area level, were associated with higher odds of becoming a high-cost patient within a 5-year period. Moreover, the inequality analysis suggested pro-high-SES gradients in high-cost transitions. Conclusions: Policies aimed at high-cost patients with mental illness and/or addiction, or those concerned with preventing individuals with these conditions from becoming high-cost patients in the health care system, should also consider non-clinical factors such as income as well as related dimensions including food security and homeownership.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. e2019658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelyn K. Jetelina ◽  
Rebecca J. Molsberry ◽  
Jennifer Reingle Gonzalez ◽  
Alaina M. Beauchamp ◽  
Trina Hall

Medical Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 868-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marguerite E. Burns ◽  
Haiden A. Huskamp ◽  
Jessica C. Smith ◽  
Jeanne M. Madden ◽  
Stephen B. Soumerai

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
O. Lawrence ◽  
J.D. Gostin

In the summer of 1979, a group of experts on law, medicine, and ethics assembled in Siracusa, Sicily, under the auspices of the International Commission of Jurists and the International Institute of Higher Studies in Criminal Science, to draft guidelines on the rights of persons with mental illness. Sitting across the table from me was a quiet, proud man of distinctive intelligence, William J. Curran, Frances Glessner Lee Professor of Legal Medicine at Harvard University. Professor Curran was one of the principal drafters of those guidelines. Many years later in 1991, after several subsequent re-drafts by United Nations (U.N.) Rapporteur Erica-Irene Daes, the text was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly as the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care. This was the kind of remarkable achievement in the field of law and medicine that Professor Curran repeated throughout his distinguished career.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Martens ◽  
◽  
Randy Fransoo ◽  
Elaine Burland ◽  
Charles Burchill ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document