Evolution of rock cover, surface roughness, and its effect on soil erosion under simulated rainfall

Geoderma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 379 ◽  
pp. 114622
Author(s):  
Li Li ◽  
Mark A. Nearing ◽  
Viktor O. Polyakov ◽  
Mary H. Nichols ◽  
Frederick B. Pierson ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 651-668
Author(s):  
L. Li ◽  
M.A. Nearing ◽  
V.O. Polyakov ◽  
M.H. Nichols ◽  
M.L. Cavanaugh

Soil Research ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 109 ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Singer ◽  
PH Walker

The 20-100 mm portion of a yellow podzolic soil (Albaqualf) from the Ginninderra Experiment Station (A.C.T.) was used in a rainfall simulator and flume facility to elucidate the interactions between raindrop impact, overland water flow and straw cover as they affect soil erosion. A replicated factorial design compared soil loss in splash and runoff from 50 and 100 mm h-1 rainfall, the equivalent of 100 mm h-1 overland flow, and 50 and 100 mm h-1 rainfall plus the equivalent of 100 mm h-' overland flow, all at 0, 40 and 80% straw cover on a 9% slope. As rainfall intensity increased, soil loss in splash and runoff increased. Within cover levels, the effect of added overland flow was to decrease splash but to increase total soil loss. This is due to an interaction between raindrops and runoff which produces a powerful detaching and transporting mechanism within the flow known as rain-flow transportation. Airsplash is reduced, in part, because of the changes in splash characteristics which accompany changes in depths of runoff water. Rain-flow transportation accounted for at least 64% of soil transport in the experiment and airsplash accounted for no more than 25% of soil transport The effects of rainfall, overland flow and cover treatments, rather than being additive, were found to correlate with a natural log transform of the soil loss data.


CATENA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 92-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuxin Liu ◽  
Yan Xin ◽  
Yun Xie ◽  
Wenting Wang

Geomorphology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 349 ◽  
pp. 106896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingming Guo ◽  
Wenlong Wang ◽  
Jianming Li ◽  
Yun Bai ◽  
Hongliang Kang ◽  
...  

10.5772/24086 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. M. Abd Elbasit ◽  
Hiroshi Yasuda ◽  
Atte Salmi ◽  
Zahoor Ahm

2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Vermang ◽  
L. Darrell Norton ◽  
Jan M. Baetens ◽  
Chi-hua Huang ◽  
Wim M. Cornelis ◽  
...  

Soil Research ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Moritani ◽  
T. Yamamoto ◽  
H. Andry ◽  
M. Inoue ◽  
T. Kaneuchi

We investigated a method to measure sheet erosion by characterising the soil erosion of an upland field in a dryland environment. Digital photogrammetry was used to measure the erosion rates of soil surfaces packed to different densities under simulated rainfall or wind conditions. The photogrammetry system consisted of 2 digital cameras, a rainfall simulator, a wind tunnel, and a computer program for 3-dimensional algorithm analysis. First, we assessed the accuracy of our method by comparing conventionally measured data to photogrammetric data under conditions of either no rainfall or no wind application. Two statistical parameters were used to evaluate the soil surface evolution: the mean absolute error (MAE) and the mean relative error (MRE). Their values were 0.21 mm and 15.8%, respectively. We then assessed the precision of our system under simulated rainfall conditions using 3 different dry bulk densities for the packed saturated soil surface. At densities of 0.91, 0.98, and 1.09 g/cm3, the MAE (MRE) values were 2.21 mm (392.5%), 1.07 mm (126.4%), and 0.59 mm (57.6%), respectively. It was possible to monitor and evaluate both the amount of eroded soil and the erosion mechanism in a specific area. Moreover, this system could be applied to measuring wind erosion with an MAE accuracy as high as 0.21 mm. The digital elevation models (DEMs) allowed for detailed analyses of soil surface evolution, and it was also possible to monitor sheet erosion with high spatial and temporal resolutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document