scholarly journals Earthworms, Darwin and prehistoric agriculture-Chernozem genesis reconsidered

Geoderma ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 409 ◽  
pp. 115607
Author(s):  
Stefan Dreibrodt ◽  
Robert Hofmann ◽  
Marta Dal Corso ◽  
Hans-Rudolf Bork ◽  
Rainer Duttmann ◽  
...  
Evolution ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-311
Author(s):  
Mary W. Helms

Heredity ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 117 (5) ◽  
pp. 301-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Arendt ◽  
K M Cairns ◽  
J W O Ballard ◽  
P Savolainen ◽  
E Axelsson

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e106244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Lauer ◽  
Katharina Prost ◽  
Renate Gerlach ◽  
Stefan Pätzold ◽  
Mareike Wolf ◽  
...  

1962 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Jesse D. Jennings ◽  
Richard B. Woodbury

1961 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 8-10
Author(s):  
Richard B. Woodbury

Over the past decade many authors have briefly cited or discussed several kinds of evidence for the prehistoric agriculture of the Southwest. Most of this evidence, however, has not received careful scrutiny, nor has it been given major emphasis in any but a few archaeological studies. The importance of agriculture has been more often assumed than demonstrated, and a critical reading of Southwestern archaeological literature reveals that all too often reference to “agriculture” (or “horticulture“) is unaccompanied by any consideration of the many different types of activity that are subsumed by such a term.From the earliest days of exploration among the “cliff-dwellings” and other ruins the presence of stored corn made it clear that the occupants had been farmers. Other evidence seemed superfluous, since the surviving Pueblo Indians were also farmers, and it could be assumed that farming methods had changed but little over the centuries. Therefore, none of the earlier archaeologists in the Southwest gave serious attention to the agricultural evidence.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (S1) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Felix Bittmann ◽  
Renate Gerlach ◽  
Manfred Rösch ◽  
Wolfram Schier

1999 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Nicolas Haas

Oospores of 11 charophyte species were found in the Late Quaternary gyttja deposits of Lake Bibersee near the town of Zug. Except for the Boreal period rarely more than three different species were growing simultaneously during the Holocene. This compares well to typical Characeae lakes of the same size today, and shows that considerable changes in the hydrophyte diversity have taken place through time. During the first part of the Holocene the lake was oligotrophic and the species composition was mainly regulated by lake-level fluctuations due to climatic factors. During the younger periods of the Holocene the lake became mesotrophic, and pH values were for a longer period slightly alkaline. During the Early to Middle Bronze Age (1900–1400 BC) the considerable alterations in the hydrophyte composition and the simultaneous extensive prehistoric agriculture on the fertile shores of the lake point to human impact as the primary cause for changes in charophyte diversity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document