Mo1504 Usefulness of Direct PerOral Cholangioscopy With an Ultra-Slim Upper Endoscope Combined With Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB366
Author(s):  
Mitsunori Yasuda ◽  
Yuji Naito ◽  
Satoshi Kokura ◽  
Toshikazu Yoshikawa
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Peroral Cholangioscopy ◽  
Large Balloon ◽  
Direct Peroral Cholangioscopy

Large balloon dilatation following endoscopic sphincterotomy using a balloon enteroscope for the bile duct stone extractions in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takao Itoi ◽  
Kentaro Ishii ◽  
Atsushi Sofuni ◽  
Fumihide Itokawa ◽  
Toshio Kurihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Bile Duct Stone ◽  
Large Balloon

S1786 Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation After Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Stones in Difficult Sphincterotomy

2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. A-269
Author(s):  
Young Hwangbo ◽  
Seok Ho Dong ◽  
Jae Young Jang ◽  
Hyo Jong Kim ◽  
Byung-Ho Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Large Balloon

scholarly journals Effects Comparison between Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stone Removal

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yandong Guo ◽  
Chen Li ◽  
Shan Lei ◽  
Fachao Zhi
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Bile Duct Stone ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Mechanical Lithotripsy ◽  
Stone Removal ◽  
Large Balloon ◽  
Complications Rate

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is a treatment of choice for stone extraction and is now most frequently used. The study was to compare the efficacy of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for common bile duct stone removal. Trials comparing the effects between EPLBD and EST treatment were searched according to the study protocol. Overall stone removal rate, complete removal rate in 1st session, treatment duration, mechanical lithotripsy using rate, and overall complication rate were compared using risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) via RevMan 5.2 software. For overall stone removal rate, two therapies showed similar effect, but EPLBD showed better overall stone removal rate for stone >10 mm in diameter. For complete stone removal rate in 1st session, no difference was found, even for those with stone >10 mm in diameter; EPLBD showed longer treatment duration, higher mechanical lithotripsy using rate obvious overall complications rate, and more serious bleeding, whereas there were no significant differences for perforation, hyperamylasemia, pancreatitis, and cholecystitis/cholangitis. EPLBD showed better efficacy in certain conditions compared to EST, however with shortcomings, such as more duration, higher mechanical lithotripsy using rate, more serious overall complications rate, and bleeding.

scholarly journals Is endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation without endoscopic sphincterotomy effective?

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (23) ◽  
pp. 7289-7296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigefumi Omuta ◽  
Iruru Maetani ◽  
Michihiro Saito ◽  
Hiroaki Shigoka ◽  
Katsushige Gon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Large Balloon
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document