Outcome of ERCP related to case-volume

Background and aims In some studies, high endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) case-volume has been shown to correlate to high success rate in terms of successful cannulation and fewer adverse events. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between ERCP success and complications, and endoscopist and centre case-volumes. Methods Data were obtained from the Swedish National Register for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP (GallRiks) on all ERCPs performed for Common Bile Duct Stone (CBDS) (n = 17,873) and suspected or confirmed malignancy (n = 6152) between 2009 and 2018. Successful cannulation rate, procedure time, intra- and postoperative complication rates and post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) rate, were compared with endoscopist and centre ERCP case-volumes during the year preceding the procedure as predictor. Results In multivariable analyses of the CBDS group adjusting for age, gender and year, a high endoscopist case-volume was associated with higher successful cannulation rate, lower complication and PEP rates, and shorter procedure time (p < 0.05). Centres with a high annual case-volume were associated with high successful cannulation rate and shorter procedure time (p < 0.05), but not lower complication and PEP rates. When indication for ERCP was malignancy, a high endoscopist case-volume was associated with high successful cannulation rate and low PEP rates (p < 0.05), but not shorter procedure time or low complication rate. Centres with high case-volume were associated with high successful cannulation rate and low complication and PEP rates (p < 0.05), but not shorter procedure time. Conclusions The results suggest that higher endoscopist and centre case-volumes are associated with safer ERCP and successful outcome.

Post-ERCP Dormia basket impaction: a case report and literature review

The incidence of Common bile duct stones (CBD) in patients undergoing cholecystectomy is 10%. The present-day management of common bile duct stone may be pre-, intra-, or post-operative Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) with stone extraction. The reported complications of ERCP and CBD stone extraction range from 5 to 10% cases, that might be life threatening. Herein, we reported a case of calculus obstructive jaundice and cholangitis. Unfortunately, trials for ERCP and stone retrieval was followed by impacted Dormia basket which was successfully managed by surgerys.

EP.FRI.199 Impacted common bile duct stone managed by hepaticoduodenostomy

The management strategy of common bile duct stone will depend on personal experience, equipment availability, time and the availability of other departmental expertise. For a distally impacted common bile duct (CBD) stone in a low resource setting, an open approach will entail either leaving the stone where it is and carry out a choledochoduodenostomy, or removing the stone through a transduodenal sphincteroplasty. The latter has a significant risk of causing an acute pancreatitis. A case report of a hepaticoduodenostomy performed on a 40-year-old black African man for a retained, impacted distal CBD stone in a low resource setting with a good outcome is presented. The impacted CBD stone had complicated an open cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis by causing the dehiscence of the cystic duct stump as a result of distal biliary obstruction. A bypass procedure such as a hepaticoduodenostomy may be an alternative to the traditional choledochoduodenostomy in the management of the retained, impacted distal CBD stone especially in the presence of sepsis. A wide side- to-side hepaticoduodenostomy (&gt;3cm d) is a safe and definitive procedure for the decompression of lower CBD obstruction and has good long-term results with infrequent complications including reflux cholangitis, hepatic abscess, stone recurrence, pancreatitis and the ‘sump’ syndrome. This case demonstrates that a hepaticoduodenostomy is safe and effective in rescuing the adverse sequelae of an impacted distal CBD stone in a low resource setting.

Percutaneous Management of Biliary Stones

Bile duct stone disease is the most common causes of nonmalignant bile duct obstructions. The range of common bile duct stone formation in patients with cholecystectomy is 3 to 14.7%. Hepatolithiasis, although endemic in some parts of the world, is a rare disease that is difficult to manage. Endoscopic intervention is accepted as the first-line management of common bile duct stones. However, when the bile duct cannot be cannulated for various reasons, the endoscopic procedure fails. In this circumstance, percutaneous approach is an alternative technique for the nonsurgical treatment of bile duct stones. This article reviews the indications, technique, outcomes, and complications of the percutaneous treatment of bile duct stone disease.