The effect of obstructive jaundice on the sensitivity of intravenous anesthetic of remimazolam: study protocol for a controlled multicenter trial

Background It is well known that obstructive jaundice could affect the pharmacodynamics of some anesthetics, and the sensitivity of some anesthetics would increase among icteric patients. Remimazolam is a new ultra-short-acting intravenous benzodiazepine sedative/anesthetic, which is a high-selective and affinity ligand for the benzodiazepine site on the GABAA receptor. However, no study has reported the pharmacodynamics of remimazolam in patients with obstructive jaundice. We hypothesize that obstructive jaundice affects the pharmacodynamics of remimazolam, and the sensitivity of remimazolam increases among icteric patients. Methods/design The study will be performed as a prospective, controlled, multicenter trial. The study design is a comparison of remimazolam requirements to reach a bispectral index of 50 in patients with obstructive jaundice versus non-jaundiced patients with chronic cholecystitisor intrahepatic bile duct stones. Remimazolam was infused at 6 mg/kg/h until this endpoint was reached. Discussion Remimazolam could be suitable for anesthesia of patients with obstructive jaundice, because remimazolam is not biotransformed in the liver. Hyperbilirubinemia has been well-described to have toxic effects on the brain, which causes the increasing of sensitivity to some anesthetics, such as desflurane, isoflurane, and etomidate. Furthermore, remimazolam and etomidate have the same mechanism of action when exerting an anesthetic effect. We aim to demonstrate that obstructive jaundice affects the pharmacodynamics of remimazolam, and the dose of remimazolam when administered to patients with obstructive jaundice should be modified. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100043585. Registered on 23 February 2021

Differences in Outcome and Comparison of Stress and Immune Status in Patients with Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones after Biliary Tract Surgery Choosing Three Procedures (ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE) for Treatment

Objective. To compare the effect of choosing ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE for the treatment of patients with recurrent common bile duct stones after biliary tract surgery. Method. 115 patients with recurrent common bile duct stones after biliary surgery in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups according to the procedure, 36 patients in the ERCP group, 38 patients in the OCBDE group, and 41 patients in the LCBDE group, and compared the efficacy, stress status, and immune status of the three groups. Result. The stone removal rates were 91.67%, 97.37%, and 97.56% in the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups, respectively ( P > 0.05 ). There were statistical differences between the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups in terms of operative time, postoperative recovery time of exhaustion, recovery time of defecation, recovery time of feeding, and hospitalization time ( P < 0.05 ). The postoperative complication rates were 8.33%, 10.53%, and 7.32% in the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups, respectively ( P > 0.05 ). The recurrence rates within 1 year after surgery were 2.78%, 7.89%, and 2.44% in the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups, respectively ( P > 0.05 ). Conclusion. ERCP has short operative time, short hospital stay, and rapid postoperative recovery. LCBDE has mild trauma, and OCBDE has a wide range of application. Each of the three procedures has its own advantages and shortcomings, and the most appropriate procedure should be selected on the basis of comprehensive evaluation.

Study of patients undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at Tishreen University Hospital in Lattakia – Syria: دراسة مرضى التنظير الراجع للطرق الصفراوية والبنكرياسية في مستشفى تشرين الجامعي في اللاذقية - سوريا

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the indications, findings, and complications of performing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients and Methods: A Prospective Observational Descriptive study conducted for the period from January 2020 to January 2021, 167 consecutive ERCP were performed at Tishreen University Hospital in Lattakia-Syria. Results: The median age was 58 years, 59.30% of patients were female. The most common indications for ERCP were common bile duct stones (44.9%) and obstructive jaundice (44.3%). The median number of attempts for cannulation was 2 counts, and 74.3% of the procedures were graded as with difficulty grade 1. The most common abnormal findings were common bile duct dilation (50.3%) and bile duct stones (43.7%). The most therapeutic endoscopic interventions were sphincterotomy (64.7%) and stone extraction balloons (68.9%). The therapeutic success rate was 93.5% with repeated the procedure and complications occurred in (10.8%) of patients. The most frequent complication was mild pancreatitis (6%). Death was reported in five cases (3%), one of them (0.6%) was due to ERCP. Conclusion: ERCP is a potential risk for complications, so physicians should be adept at recognizing and treating any complications as soon as they arise.

Management of Common Bile Duct Stones Encountered During Cholecystectomy in Patients With Previous Gastric Bypass

Background: Rapid weight loss following gastric bypass (GBP) predisposes to the development of gallstones, and in those who develop gallstone disease there is a high prevalence of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Furthermore, in these patients, CBDS are difficult to extract due to the altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy following GBP. The aim of the present study was to assess outcome after various management methods applied in the counties of Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden.Methods: Data from the Swedish Register for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP (GallRiks) and the Swedish Obesity Surgery Register (SoReg) were crossmatched to identify all patients who had undergone gallstone surgery after GBP, where CBDS were found at intraoperative cholangiography, in the Stockholm and Uppsala counties 2009–2013. A retrospective review of patient records was performed for all patients identified.Results: In all, 55 patients were identified. These were managed as follows: expectancy (N = 11); transgastric ERCP (N = 2); laparoscopic choledochotomy (N = 3); open choledochotomy (N = 5); transcystic stone extraction (N = 12); and other approach (N = 13). In nine cases, data on management could not be found. There were nine cases of minor postoperative complication. No retained stones were registered. The operation time was longer for transgastric ERCP (p = 0.002), and the postoperative stay was longer following open and laparoscopic choledochotomy (p &lt; 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between any of the methods regarding the incidence of postoperative complications (p = 0.098).Discussion: Further development of techniques for managing CBDS discovered in patients undergoing cholecystectomy after previous GBP are needed, as well as more comparative studies with greater statistical power.

Choledocholithiasis comorbidity with Clonorchis sinensis: A case report

Coexisting gallbladder stones, common bile duct stones and Clonorchis sinensis infection is rare. Most radiologists and surgeons have low awareness and diagnostic suspicion of C. sinensis infection before opting for surgery.

O-EGS05 The Prevalence of Bile Duct Stones in Patients Presenting with Acute Pancreatitis vs. Jaundice in a 5774 patient series. The Case for Single Session Surgical Management

Background There is increasing evidence that single session laparoscopic cholecystectomy with cholangiography and, when necessary and available, bile duct exploration offers optimal clinical outcomes and superior cost benefits to patients with suspected bile duct stones. There is a perception that preoperative endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones is necessary in patients presenting with pancreatitis and jaundice. However, most patients do not have severe disease and are fit for index admission surgical management. We aim to study the prevalence of bile duct stones in pancreatitis vs. jaundice and evaluate this management approach with regards to preoperative and operative parameters and postoperative outcomes. Methods Analysis of prospectively maintained database of 5774 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies, cholangiography(IOC) with or without bile duct exploration was undertaken. Patients with suspected bile duct stones are referred to one firm with an intention of single surgical treatment in the index admission. Data of patients presenting with acute pancreatitis and obstructive jaundice was extracted. In the absence of suspected malignancy there was a limited role for preoperative MRCP and ERCP. The incidence of confirmed CBD stones requiring exploration, type of exploration, morbidity, re-operations and readmissions, hospital stay, number of episodes, and presentation to resolution intervals were compared in the two groups. Results Conclusions Single session surgical treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis and jaundice by specialist firms in the index admission (89% and 86% if previous admissions by other units is excluded) offers many advantages. MRCP and ERCP utilisation is minimised in favour of IOC; two thirds of pancreatitis patients and one third of jaundiced patients have no CBD stones. Simple transcystic explorations deals with most stones in both groups. The morbidity, open conversion, readmissions, retained stones and re-operations are low. Total hospital stay, number of treatment episodes and presentation to resolution are optimised and should persuade surgeons to avoid subjecting patients to multiple treatments.