Mo1363 Impact of Fecal Occult Blood Testing (FOBT) in Decision Making for an Early Intervention in Hospitalized Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Study From Urban-Minority Population

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. AB470
Author(s):  
Amaninder J. Dhaliwal ◽  
Natasha Suleman ◽  
Garen Derhartunian ◽  
Ajay Pal Singh ◽  
Sarvani Madiraju ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chien-Hua Chiang ◽  
Jen-Eing Jeng ◽  
Wen-Ming Wang ◽  
Bing-Hong Jheng ◽  
Wan-Ting Hsu ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. S1031-S1032
Author(s):  
Amaninder Jeet Singh. Dhaliwal ◽  
Garen Derhartunian ◽  
Irina Laptevsky ◽  
Sarvani Madiraju ◽  
Saw Sein ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 421-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Narula ◽  
Diana Ulic ◽  
Raed Al-Dabbagh ◽  
Ali Ibrahim ◽  
Maged Mansour ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is a screening tool designed for the early detection of colorectal cancer in primary care. Although not validated for use in hospitalized patients, it is often used by hospital physicians for reasons other than asymptomatic screening.OBJECTIVE: To profile the in-hospital use of the FOBT and assess its impact on patient care.METHODS: Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for all FOBTs conducted over a three-month period in 2011 by the central laboratory supporting the three acute care campuses of Hamilton Health Sciences (Hamilton, Ontario).RESULTS: A total of 229 patients underwent 351 tests; 52% were female and the mean age was 49 years (range one to 104 years). A total of 80 (34.9%) patients had at least one positive test. The most common indications for testing were anemia (51.0%) and overt gastrointestinal bleeding (19.2%). Only one patient had testing performed for asymptomatic colorectal cancer screening. In only 20 (8.7%) cases medications were modified before testing and diet was modified in only 21 (9.2%) cases. Most patients (85.2%) were taking one or more medications that could result in a false-positive result. Only 18 (7.9%) patients had a digital rectal examinations documented, of which seven were positive. All patients with a positive digital rectal examination underwent endoscopic procedures that revealed a source of bleeding. Among 44 patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding, 12 (27.3%) had endoscopic investigations delayed to await results of the FOBT. Four patients were referred despite a negative FOBT due to a high degree of suspicion of gastrointestinal bleeding.CONCLUSIONS: The FOBT is often used inappropriately in the hospital setting. Confounding factors, such as diet and medication use, which may lead to false positives, are often ignored. Use of the FOBT in-hospital may lead to inappropriate management of patients, increased length of stay and increased direct medical costs. Use of the FOBT should be limited to validated indications only.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document