Su1641 Risk of Delayed Bleeding Following Cold SNARE Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. AB375
Author(s):  
Akira Horiuchi ◽  
Toshiyuki Makino ◽  
Naoyuki Fujiwara
2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 502-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Makino ◽  
Akira Horiuchi ◽  
Masashi Kajiyama ◽  
Naoki Tanaka ◽  
Kenji Sano ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yoshikazu Inagaki ◽  
Naohisa Yoshida ◽  
Kohei Fukumoto ◽  
Kyoichi Kassai ◽  
Ken Inoue ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. E254-E258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Abe ◽  
Haruaki Nabeta ◽  
Ryota Koyanagi ◽  
Taro Nakamichi ◽  
Hayato Hirashima ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Despite widespread use of cold snare polypectomy (CSP), the R0 resection rate is not well documented. We perform extended CSP, resecting polyps with a > 1 mm circumferential margin. The aim of this study is to compare the R0 resection rate of extended CSP with conventional CSP and to assess safety. Patients and methods From April 2014 to September 2016, 712 non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, < 10 mm in size, resected using CSP from 316 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results We divided lesions into conventional CSP (n = 263) and extended CSP groups (n = 449). The baseline characteristics of these two groups were not significantly different in univariate or multivariate analyses. Sessile polyps comprised 94 % (668/712), and the remaining were flat-elevated polyps. Mean size of polyps (±standard deviation) was 4.2 ± 1.5 mm. The most frequent pathology was low grade adenoma (97 %, 689/712). The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the extended CSP group (439/449 [98 %]) than in the conventional CSP group (222/263 [84 %], P < 0.001). There was no delayed bleeding or perforation in either group (conventional CSP group, 0/263, 95 % confidence interval: 0.0 – 1.4 % and extended CSP group, 0/449, 95 % confidence interval: 0.0 – 0.8 %). Conclusions Extended CSP results in a higher R0 resection rate compared with conventional CSP. Extended CSP did not result in a higher rate of delayed bleeding or perforation. Extended CSP is a safe and promising procedure for endoscopic resection of non-pedunculated colorectal polyps < 10 mm in size


2021 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Kudo ◽  
A Horiuchi ◽  
I Horiuchi ◽  
M Kajiyama ◽  
A Morita ◽  
...  

Background and study aims : Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is not recommended for the resection of pedunculated colorectal polyp. The aim of this study was to examine the adequacy of CSP compared to hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for the complete resection of pedunculated polyps with heads ≤ 1 cm in diameter. Patients and methods : This was a retrospective study of a cohort of consecutive outpatients who had resection of pedunculated polyps with heads 6-10 mm in diameter using either dedicated CSP or HSP from 2014 through 2019. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of delayed bleeding. Secondary outcome measures included total procedure time, en bloc resection rate, immediate bleeding, and number of clips used. Results : 415 patients with 444 eligible polyps were enrolled; the CSP group (363 patients; 386 polyps) and HSP group (52 patients; 58 polyps). Patient characteristics, polyp characteristics and en bloc resection rate were similar between groups. The mean total procedure time and mean number (range) of hemostatic clips/patient used were significantly lower with CSP than with HSP (18± 8 min vs. 25± 9 min, P<0.001; 1.1 ± 0.6 (1-3) vs.3.1 ± 1.6 (1-5), respectively, P<0.001). Delayed bleeding occurred significantly less frequently in the CSP, 0% (0/363 vs.3.8% (2/52) in the HSP group (P<0.001), although immediate bleeding was significantly higher in CSP than HSP (84% (325/386) vs. 12% (7/58), P<0.001). Conclusion : Pedunculated colorectal polyps with heads ≤ 1 cm can be removed using CSP, which has several advantages over HSP.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Teng-Jiao Gao ◽  
Xiao-Yun Ding

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document