211 Comparative Efficacy of the Iso-Tome ® Precut Versus Needle-Knife Precut Fistulotomy in Cases of Difficult Biliary Cannulation

2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. AB60
Author(s):  
Su Jung Han ◽  
Tae Hoon Lee ◽  
Sang-Heum Park ◽  
Hyun Jong Choi ◽  
Yun Nah Lee ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark op den Winkel ◽  
Jörg Schirra ◽  
Christian Schulz ◽  
Enrico N. De Toni ◽  
Christian J. Steib ◽  
...  

Background: In the setting of a naïve papilla, biliary cannulation is a key step in successfully performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) is associated with an increased risk of post-ERCP-pancreatitis and failure of the whole procedure. Summary: Recommendations for biliary cannulation can be divided in (a) measures to reduce the likelihood of a difficult papilla-situation a priori and (b) rescue techniques in case the endoscopist is actually facing DBC. (a): careful inspection of the papillary anatomy and optimizing its accessibility by scope-positioning is fundamental. A sphincterotome in combination with a soft-tip hydrophilic guide-wire rather than a standard catheter with a standard guide-wire should be used. (b): The most important rescue techniques are needle-knife precut, double-guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy. In few cases, anterograde techniques are needed. To this regard, the EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) followed by rendezvous is increasingly used as an alternative to percutaneous-transhepatic biliary drainage. Key Messages: Biliary cannulation can be accomplished with alternative retrograde or less frequently by salvage-anterograde techniques, once conventional direct cannulation attempts have failed. Considering recent favorable data for the early use of transpancreatic sphincterotomy, an adopted version of the 2016 European-Society-for-Gastrointestinal-Endoscopy (ESGE)-algorithm on biliary cannulation is proposed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 3606-3610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-hong Zhu ◽  
Qiang Liu ◽  
De-qing Zhang ◽  
Huang Feng ◽  
Wei-chang Chen

Gut and Liver ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Jung Lee ◽  
Yun Kyung Park ◽  
Min Ji Lee ◽  
Kyu Taek Lee ◽  
Kwang Hyuck Lee ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Antonio Facciorusso ◽  
Daryl Ramai ◽  
Paraskevas Gkolfakis ◽  
Shahab R. Khan ◽  
Ioannis S. Papanikolaou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (11) ◽  
pp. E1611-E1616
Author(s):  
Emilio J. De la Morena Madrigal ◽  
Isabel Rodríguez García ◽  
Ana Belén Galera Ródenas ◽  
Elena Pérez Arellano

Abstract Background and study aims Current clinical guidelines recommend needle-knife precut (NKP) as the primary and best method for performing a biliary cannulation (BC) when simple techniques fail and the criteria are met for difficult BC (DBC). However, many endoscopists avoid or defer early NKP in favor of alternative, simpler techniques that have not been shown to be either safer or more effective. Our goal is to test a device that provides the needle-knife papillotome (NKPT) with traction capability and which can facilitate the learning and execution of NKP. Patients and methods This was a descriptive bicentric observational study of a personal cohort of patients undergoing early NKP to analyse the efficacy and safety of the technique with a “hybrid-tome” (HT) built using the isolated core of a NKPT and a conventional canulotome. Results Over a 4-year period, we performed 43 NKPs with the HT, achieving BC in one or two steps in all cases. The 100 % technical success was matched by a 95 % clinical success rate. We recorded 11 adverse events (23 %): five hemorrhages, four pancreatitis, and two cholangitis. In addition to the objective data, we confirmed that HT facilitates alignment with the duodenal papilla and the execution of pre-cutting, especially if the papilla is intradiverticular or hidden by folds. Conclusions The HT tested seems to help trained endoscopists to perform NKP, especially in some anatomic situations, which can improve compliance with the guidelines recommended for early NKP in patients with DBC.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 5506-5512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi-Sheng Zhang ◽  
Bing Han ◽  
Jian-Hua Xu ◽  
Peng Gao ◽  
Yu-Cui Shen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document