scholarly journals Su1034 OUTCOMES OF PALLIATIVE TREATMENT FOR MALIGNANT GASTROINTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION WITH PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS: STENT PLACEMENT VERSUS PALLIATIVE SURGERY AND PREDICTORS OF STENT FAILURE

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB275
Author(s):  
Veeravich Jaruvongvanich ◽  
F.N.U. Chesta ◽  
Meher Oberoi ◽  
Navtej S. Buttar
2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (10) ◽  
pp. E1487-E1494
Author(s):  
Veeravich Jaruvongvanich ◽  
FNU Chesta ◽  
Anushka Baruah ◽  
Meher Oberoi ◽  
Daniel Adamo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Management of malignant gastrointestinal obstruction (MGIO) is more challenging in the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Outcomes data to guide the management of MGIO with PC are lacking. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and adverse events between endoscopic and surgical palliation and identify predictors of stent success in patients with MGIO with PC. Patients and methods Consecutive inpatients with MGIO with PC between 2000 and 2018 who underwent palliative surgery or enteral stenting were included. Clinical success was defined as relief of obstructive symptoms. Results Fifty-seven patients with enteral stenting and 40 with palliative surgery were compared. The two groups did not differ in rates of technical success, 30-day mortality, or recurrence. Clinical success from a single intervention (63.2 % versus 95 %), luminal patency duration (27 days vs. 145 days), and survival length (148 days vs. 336 days) favored palliative surgery (all P < 0.05) but the patients in the surgery group had a trend toward better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status. The rate of adverse events (AEs) (10.5 % vs. 50 %), the severity of AEs, and length of hospital stay (4.5 days vs. 9 days) favored enteral stenting (P < 0.05). The need for more than one stent was associated with a higher likelihood of stent failure. Conclusions Our study suggests that enteral stenting is safer and associated with a shorter hospital stay than palliative surgery, although unlike other MGIOs, clinical success is lower in MGIO with PC. Identification of the right candidates and potential predictors of clinical success in ECOG-matched large-scale studies is needed to validate these results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 383-390
Author(s):  
Marta Patita ◽  
Rui Castro ◽  
Diogo Libânio ◽  
Rui Pedro Bastos ◽  
Rui Silva ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have been used for the palliative treatment of malignant gastrointestinal tract obstruction. However, restenosis or incomplete expansion of a first stent is a frequent complication, and the effectiveness of reintervention with placement of a second stent is still controversial. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the clinical outcomes of covered SEMS (cSEMS) placement after dysfunction of uncovered SEMS (uSEMS) by the stent-in-stent technique. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively studied a consecutive series of patients receiving palliative treatment for malignant gastrointestinal obstruction with cSEMS placement after uSEMS dysfunction in a tertiary center from January 2013 to August 2018. Technical and clinical success, time of patency, and adverse events were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twelve patients were included; their mean age was 60 ± 9 years. Eleven patients had gastric outlet obstruction, and 1 patient had compression of the transverse colon due to gastric neoplasia. In 5 cases, there was absence of early clinical success with uSEMS and stent dysfunction in 7 cases (median patency time: 81 days). There was 100% technical success and 91.7% clinical success after cSEMS placement. There were no adverse events nor need for reintervention. The median patency time after placement of both stents was 163 days (vs. 71 days with the initial stent). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> cSEMS placement after uSEMS dysfunction is technically feasible and a clinically effective treatment for patients with recurrent malignant gastrointestinal obstruction, with good stent patency in the medium/long term. This approach seems to be safe and without increase in adverse effects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB532-AB533
Author(s):  
FNU Chesta ◽  
Veeravich Jaruvongvanich ◽  
Meher Oberoi ◽  
Zaheer H. Rizvi ◽  
Alyssa J. Meyer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-82
Author(s):  
Megumi Sano ◽  
Shinichi Asaka ◽  
Masaya Satake ◽  
Jun Kinoshita ◽  
Masaki Matsumura ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 311-322
Author(s):  
Robert J. Litwin ◽  
Johanna L. Chan ◽  
Steven Y. Huang

AbstractMalignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a relatively common condition affecting patients with advanced malignancy. Therapeutic interventions should be aimed at maintaining quality of life. Given the lack of prospective controlled studies in this patient population, patient management is often based on local practice patterns and anecdotal experience. To foster a collaborative approach among the members of the patient care team involving internal medicine, oncology, palliative care, clinical nutrition, surgery, gastroenterology, and interventional radiology physicians, it is important to improve our understanding of MBO. The purpose of this article is to describe the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, as well as medical, surgical, and nonsurgical palliative options available to patients with MBO for purposes of decompression and nutrition.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine L. de Boer ◽  
Jan A.W. Hagemans ◽  
Bob T.A. Schultze ◽  
Alexandra R.M. Brandt-Kerkhof ◽  
Eva V.E. Madsen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Virginia Sun ◽  
Tami Tittelfitz ◽  
Marjorie J. Hein

Surgery and chemotherapy are common treatment modalities used to manage disease and symptoms in palliative settings where the disease is incurable. These treatment modalities can lead to deteriorations in a patient’s quality of life (QOL). The benefits of palliative surgery and chemotherapy should always focus on QOL, symptom control, and symptom prevention. The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the definition of palliative surgery and chemotherapy, describe common indications for surgery and chemotherapy for palliative treatment intent, and discuss the role of nursing in caring for patients who are receiving palliative surgery and chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document