Coronary stenosis detection by 16-slice computed tomography in heart transplant patients: Comparison with conventional coronary angiography and impact on clinical management

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. S114 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Romeo ◽  
L. Houyel ◽  
J.F. Paul ◽  
P. Brenot ◽  
J.Y. Riou ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1826-1831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Romeo ◽  
Lucile Houyel ◽  
Claude-Yves Angel ◽  
Philippe Brenot ◽  
Jean-Yves Riou ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R P J Budde ◽  
F M A Nous ◽  
A A Constantinescu ◽  
K Nieman ◽  
L M Koweek ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation. Annual screening is recommended to improve risk stratification and early treatment of CAV and is often performed with invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct) might be a non-invasive alternative to ICA for the surveillance of CAV providing both anatomical and functional information. Purpose To describe our initial results with CCTA and FFRct for detection of CAV in a cohort of heart transplant patients. Methods Heart transplant patients who underwent CCTA with FFRct as part of routine annual assessment for CAV were enrolled in a prospective registry from February 2018 to February 2019 in a single center. The most recently known CAV score (0–3) based on invasive angio and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before CCTA was recorded. CCTA image quality was scored as non-diagnostic, moderate, good or excellent. FFRct analysis was performed off-site by a commercial company. For each coronary stenosis >30%, an FFRCTvalue distal to the stenosis was measured. For the RCA, LAD and CX without a stenosis, the FFRct value in the most distal location in the vessel was recorded. CAV classification was rescored based on CCTA. Demographics, additional diagnostic tests, and treatment plans were evaluated including major adverse events (MACE) during 90-day follow-up. Results 65 patients (56 (39–65) years (median/ 25th–75thpercentile), 40% women) that were 11 (7–16) years after transplantation were included. The most recent CAV score was 0 in 52 patients (80%) and 1 or 2 in 13 patients. CCTA image quality was good or excellent in 59 (91%) patients. CCTA reclassified CAV scores in 32 (49%) patients to 33 patients with CAV 0, 18 patients with CAV 1, 9 patients with CAV 2 and 5 patients with CAV 3. In 17 patients (26%) at least one stenosis with FFRct ≤0.80 was detected including 11 patients with single vessel disease, 5 with two-vessel disease and one with three-vessel disease. In the 48 patients without a focal stenosis, mean distal FFRct values were 0.88 (0.86–0.91), 0.87 (0.85–0.90) and 0.90 (0.86–0.91) at less than 10, 10–15 or more than 15 years after transplantation, respectively (p=0.457). Additional tests were performed in 10 (15%) patients (1 SPECT and 10 invasive coronary angiographies), which resulted in revascularization by PCI in 6 (9%) patients. No MACE occurred during 90-day follow-up. Conclusion CCTA with FFRct can be successfully performed in heart transplant patients, detects patients with significant coronary stenosis and CCTA leads to substantial reclassification of CAV grades. Acknowledgement/Funding FFRct analysis was performed as part of the ADVANCE registry which is supported by Heartflow Inc.


Author(s):  
Rajneesh Malhotra ◽  
Manisha Mishra ◽  
Poonam Khurana ◽  
Monika Aggarwal ◽  
Yugal Mishra ◽  
...  

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the postoperative graft patency assessment by multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) scan and conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients 1 year after surgery. Methods Sixty-nine patients who underwent isolated CABG at least 1 year before the study, were subjected to both MSCT angiography with cardiac gating and CCA. The results were evaluated and compared. Results There were 209 grafts in 69 patients. All grafts were evaluated by both MSCT angiography and CCA. Seventy-eight grafts were on the anterior wall, 83 on the lateral wall and 48 on the inferior wall of the heart. On MSCT angiography, all left internal mammary arteries were visualized with 3-dimensional reconstruction and found to be patent. Of 209 grafts, 11 grafts (5.26%) were blocked, 6 grafts on the lateral wall and 5 on the inferior wall. All patent grafts were correctly evaluated by MSCT angiography (specificity 100%). However, 2 grafts that were found to be patent on MSCT angiography were blocked on CCA (MSCT sensitivity 81.8%). Conclusions Postoperative evaluation of coronary bypass grafts is possible with very good resolution by MSCT angiography. This method allows evaluation of the bypass grafts and the quality of anastomosis with a noninvasive method that is comparable with CCA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Kenji Sadamatsu ◽  
Kazuhiro Nagaoka ◽  
Yasuaki Koga ◽  
Kotaro Kagiyama ◽  
Kohei Muramatsu ◽  
...  

Background. We investigated whether or not the addition of myocardial mass at risk (MMAR) to quantitative coronary angiography was useful for diagnosing functionally significant coronary stenosis in the daily practice. Methods. We retrospectively enrolled 111 consecutive patients with 149 lesions who underwent clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography and subsequent elective coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. MMAR was calculated using a workstation-based software program with ordinary thin slice images acquired for the computed tomography, and the minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and the diameter stenosis were measured with quantitative coronary angiography. Results. The MLD and MMAR were significantly correlated with the FFR, and the MMAR-to-MLD ratio (MMAR/MLD) showed a good correlation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of MMAR/MLD for FFR ≤ 0.8 was 0.746, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 60%, 83%, 68%, and 77%, respectively, at a cut-off value of 29.5 ml/mm. The addition of MMAR/MLD to diameter stenosis thus made it possible to further discriminate lesions with FFR ≤ 0.8 (AUC = 0.750). For the proximal left coronary artery lesions, in particular, MMAR/MLD showed a better correlation with the FFR, and the AUC of MMAR/MLD for FFR ≤ 0.8 was 0.919 at a cut-off value of 31.7 ml/mm. Conclusions. The index of MMAR/MLD correlated well with the physiological severity of coronary stenosis and showed good accuracy for detecting functional significance. The MMAR/MLD might be a useful parameter to consider when deciding the indication for revascularization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document