Post-transplant survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients concurrently listed for single and double lung transplantation

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 657-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhaval Chauhan ◽  
Ashwin B. Karanam ◽  
Aurelie Merlo ◽  
PA Tom Bozzay ◽  
Mark J. Zucker ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Michael Z L Zhu ◽  
Joanna Yilin Huang ◽  
David Hongwei Liu ◽  
Gregory I Snell

Summary A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: ‘Does continuation of antifibrotics before lung transplantation (LTx) influence post-transplant outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with regard to mortality, bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, reoperation for bleeding and wound complications, primary graft dysfunction or longer-term survival and allograft rejection?’ A total of 261 articles were found using the reported search strategy, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Six out of 7 studies demonstrated equivalent post-transplant survival among IPF patients on antifibrotics before LTx compared with controls. Five out of 6 studies showed no increase in the risk of major bleeding, wound or bronchial anastomotic complications. One bi-institutional study found a higher incidence of early bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, but this difference was not statistically significant after longer term follow-up. In a study that only included IPF patients who underwent single LTx, a lower incidence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction was reported in the antifibrotic group compared with controls. Overall, to date, only small (N < 40 in the antifibrotic group), non-risk-adjusted, retrospective observational studies have been published. Notwithstanding, the summation of available evidence suggests that, in IPF patients, continuation of antifibrotic therapy before LTx is likely safe, and the rates of perioperative bleeding, wound or bronchial anastomotic complications, as well as 30-day and 1-year survival, are similar to patients not on antifibrotics before LTx.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalía Laporta Hernandez ◽  
Myriam Aguilar Perez ◽  
María Lázaro Carrasco ◽  
Piedad Ussetti Gil

Despite the advances in recent years in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), it continues to be a progressive disease with poor prognosis. In selected patients, lung transplantation may be a treatment option, with optimal results in survival and quality of life. Currently, pulmonary fibrosis is the main cause of lung transplantation. However, mortality on the waiting list of these patients is high, since many patients are referred to the transplant units with advanced disease. There is not a parameter that can predict the survival of a specific patient. Different variables are to be considered in order to decide the right time to send them to a transplant unit. It is also very difficult to decide when to include these patients on the waiting list. Every patient diagnosed with IPF, without contraindications for surgery, should be referred early to a transplant unit for assessment. A uni or bilateral transplantation will be decided based on the characteristics of the patient and the experience of each center. The post-transplant survival of recipients with IPF is lower than that observed in other diseases, such as cystic fibrosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a consequence of their older age and the frequent presence of associated comorbidity. Post-transplant follow-up must be tight in order to assure optimal level of immunosuppressive treatment, detect complications associated with it, and avoid graft rejection. The main cause of long-term mortality is late graft dysfunction as a consequence of chronic rejection. Other complications, such as infections and tumors, must be considered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3474
Author(s):  
Belén López-Muñiz Ballesteros ◽  
Marta López-Herranz ◽  
Ana Lopez-de-Andrés ◽  
Valentín Hernandez-Barrera ◽  
Rodrigo Jiménez-García ◽  
...  

(1) Background: To assess sex differences in the incidence, characteristics, procedures and outcomes of patients admitted with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); and to analyze variables associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM). (2) Methods: We analyzed data collected by the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database, 2016–2019. (3) Results: We identified 13,278 hospital discharges (66.4% men) of IPF (primary diagnosis 32.33%; secondary diagnosis: 67.67%). Regardless of the diagnosis position, IPF incidence was higher among men than women, increasing with age. Men had 2.74 times higher IPF incidence than women. Comorbidity was higher for men in either primary or secondary diagnosis. After matching, men had higher prevalence of pulmonary embolism and pneumonia, and women of congestive heart failure, dementia, rheumatoid disease and pulmonary hypertension. Invasive ventilation, bronchoscopy and lung transplantation were received more often by men than women. IHM was higher among men with IPF as primary diagnosis than among women and increased with age in both sexes and among those who suffered cancer, pneumonia or required mechanical ventilation. (4) Conclusions: Incidence of IPF was higher among men than women, as well as comorbidity and use of bronchoscopy, ventilation and lung transplantation. IHM was worse among men than women with IPF as primary diagnosis, increasing with age, cancer, pneumonia or mechanical ventilation use.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 987
Author(s):  
Mustafa Vayvada ◽  
Ayse Halis ◽  
Pinar Guney ◽  
Sevinc Citak ◽  
Ali Yiginsu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jonathan K. Alder ◽  
Rachel M. Sutton ◽  
Carlo J. Iasella ◽  
Mehdi Nouraie ◽  
Ritchie Koshy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document