scholarly journals Supra-threshold auditory brainstem response amplitudes in humans: Test-retest reliability, electrode montage and noise exposure

2018 ◽  
Vol 364 ◽  
pp. 38-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garreth Prendergast ◽  
Wenhe Tu ◽  
Hannah Guest ◽  
Rebecca E. Millman ◽  
Karolina Kluk ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21
Author(s):  
Fatin Nabilah Jamal ◽  
Ahmad Aidil Arafat Dzulkarnain ◽  
Fatin Amira Shahrudin ◽  
Muhammad Nasrullah Marzuki

Background and Objectives: There is growing interest in the use of the Level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp<sup>®</sup> stimulus in auditory brainstem response (ABR) due to its ability to produce prominent ABR waves with robust amplitudes. There are no known studies that investigate the test-retest reliability of the ABR to the LS CE-Chirp<sup>®</sup> stimulus. The present study aims to investigate the test-retest reliability of the ABR to the LS CE-Chirp<sup>®</sup> stimulus and compare its reliability with the ABR to standard click stimulus at multiple intensity levels in normal-hearing adults.Subjects and Methods: Eleven normal-hearing adults participated. The ABR test was repeated twice in the same clinical session and conducted again in another session. The ABR was acquired using both the click and LS CE-Chirp<sup>®</sup> stimuli at 4 presentation levels (80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL). Only the right ear was tested using the ipsilateral electrode montage. The reliability of the ABR findings (amplitudes and latencies) to the click and LS CE-Chirp<sup>®</sup> stimuli within the same clinical session and between the two clinical sessions was calculated using an intra-class correlation coefficient analysis (ICC).Results: The results showed a significant correlation of the ABR findings (amplitude and latencies) to both stimuli within the same session and between the clinical sessions. The ICC values ranged from moderate to excellent. Conclusions: The ABR results from both the LS CE-Chirp<sup>®</sup> and click stimuli were consistent and reliable over the two clinical sessions suggesting that both stimuli can be used for neurological diagnoses with the same reliability.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-86
Author(s):  
Chihiro Morimoto ◽  
Kazuhiko Nario ◽  
Tadashi Nishimura ◽  
Ryota Shimokura ◽  
Hiroshi Hosoi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi F. Bramhall ◽  
Dawn Konrad-Martin ◽  
Garnett P. McMillan ◽  
Susan E. Griest

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feifan Chen ◽  
Fei Zhao ◽  
Nadeem Mahafza ◽  
Wei Lu

Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy (CS) is defined as a permanent loss of synapses in the auditory nerve pathway following noise exposure. Several studies using auditory brainstem response (ABR) have indicated the presence of CS and increased central gain in tinnitus patients with normal hearing thresholds (TNHT), but the results were inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to review the evidence of CS and its pathological changes in the central auditory system in TNHT. Published studies using ABR to study TNHT were reviewed. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were selected to search for relevant literature. Studies (489) were retrieved, and 11 were included for meta-analysis. The results supported significantly reduced wave I amplitude in TNHT, whereas the alternations in wave V amplitude were inconsistent among the studies. Consistently increased V/I ratio indicated noise-induced central gain enhancement. The results indicated the evidence of noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in tinnitus patients with normal hearing. However, inconsistent changes in wave V amplitude may be explained by that the failure of central gain that triggers the pathological neural changes in the central auditory system and/or that increased central gain may be necessary to generate tinnitus but not to maintain tinnitus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document