Investigation of the source region of the lunar-meteorite group with the remote sensing datasets: Implication for the origin of mare volcanism in Mare Imbrium

Icarus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 114690
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Nagaoka ◽  
Makiko Ohtake ◽  
Naoki Shirai ◽  
Yuzuru Karouji ◽  
Masahiro Kayama ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3183-3190 ◽  
Author(s):  
安如 AN Ru ◽  
徐晓峰 XU Xiao-feng ◽  
李晓雪 LI Xiao-xue ◽  
梁欣 LIANG Xin

Author(s):  
Erika Palmerio ◽  
Nariaki V. Nitta ◽  
Tamitha Mulligan ◽  
Marilena Mierla ◽  
Jennifer O’Kane ◽  
...  

Eruptions of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from the Sun are usually associated with a number of signatures that can be identified in solar disc imagery. However, there are cases in which a CME that is well observed in coronagraph data is missing a clear low-coronal counterpart. These events have received attention during recent years, mainly as a result of the increased availability of multi-point observations, and are now known as “stealth CMEs.” In this work, we analyze examples of stealth CMEs featuring various levels of ambiguity. All the selected case studies produced a large-scale CME detected by coronagraphs and were observed from at least one secondary viewpoint, enabling a priori knowledge of their approximate source region. To each event, we apply several image processing and geometric techniques with the aim to evaluate whether such methods can provide additional information compared to the study of “normal” intensity images. We are able to identify at least weak eruptive signatures for all events upon careful investigation of remote-sensing data, noting that differently processed images may be needed to properly interpret and analyze elusive observations. We also find that the effectiveness of geometric techniques strongly depends on the CME propagation direction with respect to the observers and the relative spacecraft separation. Being able to observe and therefore forecast stealth CMEs is of great importance in the context of space weather, since such events are occasionally the solar counterparts of so-called “problem geomagnetic storms.”


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Krautwurst ◽  
Konstantin Gerilowski ◽  
Jakob Borchardt ◽  
Norman Wildmann ◽  
Michal Galkowski ◽  
...  

Abstract. Methane (CH4) is the second most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas, whose atmospheric concentration is modulated by human-induced activities, and it has a larger global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2). Because of its short atmospheric lifetime relative to that of CO2, the reduction of the atmospheric abundance of CH4 is an attractive target for short term climate mitigation strategies. However, reducing the atmospheric CH4 concentration requires a reduction of its emissions and, therefore, knowledge of its sources is essential. For this reason, the CO2 and Methane (CoMet) campaign in early summer of 2018 was initiated with the primary goal of assessing emissions of one of the largest CH4 emission hot spots in Europe, the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (USCB) in southern Poland, using top-down approaches and inventory data. In this campaign, a variety of instruments (both in situ and remote sensing) and platforms (e.g., ground-based and airborne) were deployed, which were supplemented by modeling activities supporting the flight planning and the interpretation of the observations. Consequently, CH4 emissions originating from ~54 coal mine ventilation shafts distributed over an area of around 60 × 40 km2 could be investigated on different scales, ranging from single shafts over smaller clusters up to the entire basin. In this study, we will focus on CH4 column anomalies retrieved from spectral radiance observations, which were acquired by the 1D nadir-looking passive remote sensing Methane Airborne MAPper (MAMAP) instrument, using the Weighting Function Modified Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFM-DOAS) method. The column anomalies are combined with wind lidar measurements and inverted to cross-sectional fluxes for different flight tracks making use of a mass balance approach. These fluxes are subsequently used to assess the reported emissions of small clusters of ventilation shafts. The MAMAP CH4 column observations allow for accurate assignment of observed fluxes to small clusters of ventilation shafts. CH4 fluxes are estimated for 4 clusters comprising 23 ventilation shafts in total, which are responsible for about 40 % of the total CH4 emissions from mining in the target area. The observations used were made during multiple overflights on different days between 28 May and 7 June 2018. The final averaged CH4 fluxes for the single clusters (or sub-clusters) range from about 1 to 9 t CH4 hr−1 at the time of the campaign. The range of fluxes observed at one cluster during different overflights can vary by as much as 50 % of the respective averaged value. Associated errors (1-σ) are usually between 15 % and 59 % of the averaged flux, mainly depending on the prevailing wind conditions, the number of flight tracks, and the magnitude of the flux itself. Comparison to known hourly emissions, where available, shows good agreement with the computed fluxes within the uncertainties. In the case that only annually reported emissions are available for comparison with the observations, caution is required due to potential fluctuations of the emissions during one year or even within hours. To measure emissions even more precisely and to further unravel them for allocation to individual shafts in a complex source region as encountered in the USCB, imaging remote sensing instruments are recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document