scholarly journals A general two-phase turbulent flow model applied to the study of sediment transport in open channels

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1099-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Chen ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Xiaojing Niu ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
Daoyi Chen ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 755 ◽  
pp. 561-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Chiodi ◽  
Philippe Claudin ◽  
Bruno Andreotti

AbstractThe transport of dense particles by a turbulent flow depends on two dimensionless numbers. Depending on the ratio of the shear velocity of the flow to the settling velocity of the particles (or the Rouse number), sediment transport takes place in a thin layer localized at the surface of the sediment bed (bedload) or over the whole water depth (suspended load). Moreover, depending on the sedimentation Reynolds number, the bedload layer is embedded in the viscous sublayer or is larger. We propose here a two-phase flow model able to describe both viscous and turbulent shear flows. Particle migration is described as resulting from normal stresses, but is limited by turbulent mixing and shear-induced diffusion of particles. Using this framework, we theoretically investigate the transition between bedload and suspended load.


Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Mathieu ◽  
Julien Chauchat ◽  
Cyrille Bonamy ◽  
Tim Nagel

This paper presents a numerical investigation of the scour phenomenon around a submarine pipeline. The numerical simulations are performed using SedFoam, a two-phase flow model for sediment transport implemented in the open source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) toolbox OpenFOAM. The paper focuses on the sensitivity of the granular stress model and the turbulence model with respect to the predictive capability of the two-phase flow model. The quality of the simulation results is estimated using a statistical estimator: the Brier Skill Score. The numerical results show no sensitivity to the granular stress model. However, the results strongly depend on the choice of the turbulence model, especially through the different implementations of the cross-diffusion term in the dissipation equation between the k − ε and the k − ω 2006 models. The influence of the cross-diffusion term tends to indicate that the sediment transport layer behaves more as a shear layer than as a boundary layer, for which the k − ε model is more suitable.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 795-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika P. Jarvinen ◽  
A. E. P. Kankkunen ◽  
R. Virtanen ◽  
P. H. Miikkulainen ◽  
V. P. Heikkila

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keh-Chin Chang ◽  
Wen-Jing Wu ◽  
Muh-Rong Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document