Instruments evaluating the quality of the clinical learning environment in nursing education: A systematic review of psychometric properties

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 60-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Mansutti ◽  
Luisa Saiani ◽  
Luca Grassetti ◽  
Alvisa Palese
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorota Ozga ◽  
Aleksandra Gutysz-Wojnicka ◽  
Bogumił Lewandowski ◽  
Beata Dobrowolska

Abstract Background. The Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HFG5RyQPqY(CLES+T) instrument is internationally used for the evaluation of clinical learning environment in undergraduate nursing education. However, no evidence is available on the possible applications of this instrument in the context of postgraduate nursing education. Purpose. To examine the basic psychometric properties of CLES+T in the context of clinical postgraduate nursing education in Poland.Methods. Study among a sample of 417 nurses participating in the clinical postgraduate training in Poland. Results. Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.97. A five-factor structure was confirmed in accordance with the assumptions adopted by the authors of the original version of the scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the Polish version of the CLES+T subscales ranged from 0.83 (Nursing care on the ward) to 0.95 (The content of supervisory relationship). The mean results for individual subscales ranged from 4.52±0.63 for nursing care on the ward to 4.73±0.45 for role of the nurse teacher. Conclusions. Having shown satisfactory psychometric properties, CLES+T can be considered a useful instrument to assess those elements of clinical learning environment which are important for the assurance of education quality at the postgraduate level.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorota Ozga ◽  
Aleksandra Gutysz-Wojnicka ◽  
Bogumił Lewandowski ◽  
Beata Dobrowolska

Abstract Background. The CLES+T instrument is internationally used for evaluation of clinical learning environment in undergraduate nursing education. However, no evidence is available on the possible applications of this instrument in the context of postgraduate nursing education. Purpose. To examine the basic psychometric properties of the CLES+T in the context of clinical postgraduate nursing education in Poland. Methods. Study among a sample of 417 nurses participating in the clinical postgraduate training in Poland. Results. Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.97. A five-factor structure was confirmed in accordance with the assumptions adopted by the authors of the original version of the scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the Polish version of the CLES+T subscales ranged from 0.83 (Nursing care on the ward) to 0.95 (The content of supervisory relationship). The mean results for individual subscales ranged from 4.52±0.63 for nursing care on the ward to 4.73±0.45 for role of the nurse teacher. Conclusions. Having shown satisfactory psychometric properties, CLES+T can be considered a useful instrument to assess those elements of clinical learning environment which are important for the assurance of education quality at the postgraduate level.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorota Ozga ◽  
Aleksandra Gutysz-Wojnicka ◽  
Bogumił Lewandowski ◽  
Beata Dobrowolska

Abstract Background . The Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale ( CLES+T) instrument is internationally used for the evaluation of clinical learning environment in undergraduate nursing education. However, no evidence is available on the possible applications of this instrument in the context of postgraduate nursing education. Purpose . To examine the basic psychometric properties of CLES+T in the context of clinical postgraduate nursing education in Poland. Methods . Study among a sample of 417 nurses participating in the clinical postgraduate training in Poland. Results . Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.97. A five-factor structure was confirmed in accordance with the assumptions adopted by the authors of the original version of the scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the Polish version of the CLES+T subscales ranged from 0.83 ( Nursing care on the ward ) to 0.95 ( The content of supervisory relationship ). The mean results for individual subscales ranged from 4.52±0.63 for nursing care on the ward to 4.73±0.45 for role of the nurse teacher . Conclusions . Having shown satisfactory psychometric properties, CLES+T can be considered a useful instrument to assess those elements of clinical learning environment which are important for the assurance of education quality at the postgraduate level.


Nursing Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Olaussen ◽  
Lars‐Petter Jelsness‐Jørgensen ◽  
Christine Raaen Tvedt ◽  
Dag Hofoss ◽  
Ingunn Aase ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-369
Author(s):  
Katie Hooven

Background and Purpose: This study was done to develop and psychometrically test the Collaboration in the Clinical Learning Environment (CCLE) tool. The researcher acknowledged 2 distinct populations that required input into this particular tool development: staff nurses and nursing faculty members. Both have influence into student learning. Methods: Research followed the 8-step methodology for tool development as defined by DeVellis. Results: Reliability testing was done on the 24-item CCLE, which confirmed a Cronbach’s alpha of .96. Exploratory factor analysis with principal component factor analysis was done to examine the structure of the instrument. Validity was supported through the content expert review, along with concurrent validity. Conclusions: Although collaboration has been emphasized for many years in the clinical learning environment, the construct has never been successfully operationalized. Implications for nursing education, practice, and theory are discussed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amal Roshdi A.Mostafa

The key requirements for creating a positive learning environment do not come readily packaged. Instructors can then implement the concepts to keep students motivated and engaged in the learning process.  The aim of study is to Creating a Positive Learning Environment for Adults; by assessing Nursing Students perceptions regarding Clinical Learning Environments in Beni – Suef University (actual and expected). A sample of 127 students in nursing faculty, Beni–Suef University from third and fourth grade in the first semester of the academic year 2014/2015.Tools: Structured interviewing questionnaire sheet, which include: Tool (1):  Socio demographic data, Tool (2): the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI) originally developed by Professor Chan (2001).Results: The results indicated that there were significant differences between the preferred and actual form in all six scales. In other word, comparing with the actual form, the mean scores of all items in the preferred form were higher. The maximum mean difference was in innovation and the highest mean difference was in involvement scale. Conclusion: It is concluded that nursing students do not have a positive perception of their actual clinical teaching environment and this perception is significantly different from their perception of their expected environment. Key words: adult learner, positive learning environment, Clinical learning environment, Nursing education, Nursing student


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document