Analgesic efficacy of aceclofenac after surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars

2006 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 518-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.V. Presser Lima ◽  
V. Fontanella
Keyword(s):  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Surgical Extraction

scholarly journals Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Opioids in Postsurgical Dental Pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  
pp. 777-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.V. Hersh ◽  
P.A. Moore ◽  
T. Grosser ◽  
R.C. Polomano ◽  
J.T. Farrar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Naproxen Sodium ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Dental Pain ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Surgical Extraction ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Versus Risk

Postsurgical dental pain is mainly driven by inflammation, particularly through the generation of prostaglandins via the cyclooxygenase system. Thus, it is no surprise that numerous randomized placebo-controlled trials studying acute pain following the surgical extraction of impacted third molars have demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen, naproxen sodium, etodolac, diclofenac, and ketorolac in this prototypic condition of acute inflammatory pain. Combining an optimal dose of an NSAID with an appropriate dose of acetaminophen appears to further enhance analgesic efficacy and potentially reduce the need for opioids. In addition to being on average inferior to NSAIDs as analgesics in postsurgical dental pain, opioids produce a higher incidence of side effects in dental outpatients, including dizziness, drowsiness, psychomotor impairment, nausea/vomiting, and constipation. Unused opioids are also subject to misuse and diversion, and they may cause addiction. Despite these risks, some dental surgical outpatients may benefit from a 1- or 2-d course of opioids added to their NSAID regimen. NSAID use may carry significant risks in certain patient populations, in which a short course of an acetaminophen/opioid combination may provide a more favorable benefit versus risk ratio than an NSAID regimen.

scholarly journals Low-intensity laser efficacy in postoperative extraction of third molars

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Nascimento MILETO ◽  
Fabiano Goulart AZAMBUJA
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Clinical State ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Surgical Extraction

ABSTRACT The search for means that enable a better quality of life for postoperative patients should be incessant. The surgical extraction of third molars can result in potential complications such as pain, swelling and trismus, along with discomfort in the recovery phase. Therefore, this narrative review was to analyze, from systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials, the use of low level laser therapy as influencer the clinical state after third molar surgery. Scientific articles were searched through PubMed and Science Direct database. In spite of the evaluated studies have cited the effectiveness of laser therapy such as tissue repair, anti-inflammatory and analgesic, variety of analysis models and diversity of dosimetry leaves a gap on their true efficacy. Based on the research conducted, we suggest the adjuvant use of diode laser GaAlAs with 810 nm (λ), 100 mW constant power and 4 J/cm2 of energy, intra and extra oral form at least three sections to minimize possible occurrences of third molar surgery.

scholarly journals Comparison of Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hani Arakji ◽  
Mohamed Shokry ◽  
Nayer Aboelsaad
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Surgical Extraction ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Bone Quantity

The purpose of this study was to test the effect of the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars using piezosurgery versus the conventional surgical technique on postoperative sequelae and bone healing.Material and Methods.This study was carried out as a randomized controlled clinical trial: split mouth design. Twenty patients with bilateral mandibular third molar mesioangular impaction class II position B indicated for surgical extraction were treated randomly using either the piezosurgery or the conventional bur technique on each site. Duration of the procedure, postoperative edema, trismus, pain, healing, and bone density and quantity were evaluated up to 6 months postoperatively.Results.Test and control sites were compared using pairedt-test. There was statistical significance in reduction of pain and swelling in test sites, where the time of the procedure was statistically increased in test site. For bone quantity and quality, statistical difference was found where test site showed better results.Conclusion.Piezosurgery technique improves quality of patient’s life in form of decrease of postoperative pain, trismus, and swelling. Furthermore, it enhances bone quality within the extraction socket and bone quantity along the distal aspect of the mandibular second molar.

scholarly journals Clinical assessment of impacted lower third molars at Ekpan, Delta State in Nigeria

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 352-355
Author(s):  
Mabel Okiemute Etetafia ◽  
Ese Anibor ◽  
Martins Obaroefe
Keyword(s):  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Impacted Tooth ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Impacted Teeth ◽  
Pull Out ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
Surgical Extraction ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Introduction: Diagnosis and management of impacted mandibular third molars call for a cogent appraisal and treatment choice both for the sick person and the dental practitioner. This academic work scrutinized the pattern as well as treatment of impacted mandibular third molars at the Teem Clinic and Dental Centre, Ekpan, Delta State, in Nigeria.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional survey involved 131 cases who reported impacted mandibular third molars. The age, gender, impacted tooth, type of impaction, pathological conditions, and treatment proffered were recorded.Results: The male to female ratio was 0.8:1, with an age range of 10 to 40 years. Of the lower third molar impactions 58 (42.0%) were mesioangular, 5 (3.6%) horizontal, 18 (13.0%) vertical and 57 (41.3%) were distoangular. A total of 47 (34.1%) quested for dental attention following varying degrees of pain induced by pericoronitis. Teeth removal was accomplished for 76 (55.0%) owing to carious lesions on the impacted teeth, proximate tooth, or both. Surgical extraction was the option taken in 69 (50.0 %) with caries on the impacted teeth while 3 (2.2%) had to pull out of their teeth done owing to carious lesions on the bordering second molars. In 3 (2.2%) both the impacted third molar and the proximate second molar were decayed. Conclusions: The prevailing indication for pulling out impacted mandibular third molars was acute pericoronitis. Mesioangular sort of impaction was most recurrent and ought to be considered for theplausibility of frequentness of complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document