Abdominal organ motion measured using 4D CT

Author(s):  
Edward D. Brandner ◽  
Andrew Wu ◽  
Hungcheng Chen ◽  
Dwight Heron ◽  
Shalom Kalnicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. S19
Author(s):  
B. Wysocka ◽  
Z. Kassam ◽  
G. Lockwood ◽  
L. Dawson ◽  
J. Brierley ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 837-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hotaka Nonaka ◽  
Hiroshi Onishi ◽  
Makoto Watanabe ◽  
Vu Hong Nam

Abstract This study assessed abdominal organ motion induced by gastroduodenal motilities in volunteers during fasting and postprandial states, using cine magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). Thirty-five volunteers underwent cine-MRI while holding their breath in the fasting and postprandial states. Gastric motility was quantified by the amplitude and velocity of antral peristaltic waves. Duodenal motility was evaluated as the change of duodenal diameter. Abdominal organ motion was measured in the liver, pancreas and kidneys. Motion was quantified by calculating maximal organ displacement in the left–right, antero–posterior and caudal–cranial directions. Median antral amplitude and velocity in the fasting and postprandial states were 7.7 and 15.1 mm (P < 0.01), and 1.3 and 2.5 mm/s (P < 0.01), respectively. Duodenal motility did not change. Median displacement for all organs ranged from 0.9 to 2.9 mm in the fasting state and from 1.0 to 2.9 mm in the postprandial state. Significant increases in abdominal organ displacement in the postprandial state were observed in the right lobe of the liver, pancreatic head and both kidneys. Differences in the median displacement of these organs between the two states were all <1 mm. Although the motion of several abdominal organs increased in the postprandial state, the difference between the two states was quite small. Thus, our study suggests that treatment planning and irradiation need not include strict management of gastric conditions, nor the addition of excess margins to compensate for differences in the intra-fractional abdominal organ motion under different gastric motilities in the fasting and postprandial states.


2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 989-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mian Xi ◽  
Meng-Zhong Liu ◽  
Qiao-Qiao Li ◽  
Ling Cai ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. S17-S18
Author(s):  
Z. Kassam ◽  
J. Ringash ◽  
G. Perkins ◽  
G. Lockwood ◽  
K. Churcher ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (6Part6) ◽  
pp. 2699-2699
Author(s):  
J Li ◽  
C Burman ◽  
M Chan ◽  
S Sim
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin S. Teh ◽  
Arnold C. Paulino ◽  
Hsin H. Lu ◽  
J. Kam Chiu ◽  
Susan Richardson ◽  
...  

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) programs to treat brain tumors were implemented when we first acquired the Brainlab Novalis system in 2003. Two years later, we started an extra-cranial stereotactic radio-ablation or more appropriately a stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) program using the Brainlab Novalis image-guided system at The Methodist Hospital in Houston, Texas. We hereby summarize our initial experience with this system in delivering image-guided SBRT to a total of 80 patients during our first year of clinical implementation, from February 2005 to January 2006. Over 100 lesions in more than 20 distinct anatomical sites were treated. These include all levels of spine from cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral lesions. Spinal lesions encompass intramedullary, intradural, extradural, or osseous compartments. Also treated were lesions in other bony sites including orbit, clavicle, scapula, humerus, sternum, rib, femur, and pelvis (ilium, ischium, and pubis). Primary or metastatic lesions located in the head and neck, supraclavicular region, axilla, mediastinum, lung (both central and peripheral), abdominal wall, liver, kidney, para-aortic lymph nodes, prostate, and pelvis were also treated. In addition to primary radiotherapy, SBRT program using the Brainlab Novalis system allows re-irradiation for recurrence and “boost” after conventional treatment to various anatomical sites. Treating these sites safely and efficaciously requires knowledge in radiation tolerance, fraction size, total dose, biologically equivalent dose (BED), prior radiotherapy, detailed dose volume histograms (DVH) of normal tissues, and the radiosensitive/radioresistant nature of the tumor. Placement of radio-opaque markers (Visicoil, Radiomed) in anatomical sites not in close proximity to bony landmarks (e.g., kidney and liver) helps in measuring motion and providing image guidance during each treatment fraction. Tumor/organ motion data obtained using 4D-CT while the patient is immobilized in the body cast aids in planning treatment margin and determining the need for respiratory motion control, e.g., abdominal compressor, gating, or active breathing control. The inclusion of PET/CT to the Brainlab treatment planning system further refines the target delineation and possibly guides differential fraction size prescription and delivery. The majority of the patients tolerated the SBRT treatment well despite the longer daily treatment time when compared to that of conventional treatment. All patients achieved good pain relief after SBRT. Compared to conventional standard radiotherapy of lower daily fraction size, we observed that the patients achieved faster pain relief and possibly more durable symptom control. Very high local control with stable disease on imaging was observed post SBRT. Our initial experience shows that the Brainlab Novalis system is very versatile in delivering image-guided SBRT to various anatomical sites. This SBRT approach can be applied to either primary or metastatic lesions in the primary, “boost,” or re-irradiation settings. The understanding of fraction size, total dose, BED, and DVH of normal tissues is very important in the treatment planning. Appropriate use of immobilization devices, radio-opaque markers for image-guidance, 4D-CT for tumor/organ motion estimates, and fusion of planning CT scans with biological/functional imaging will further improve the planning and delivery of SBRT, hopefully leading to better treatment outcome.


2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. E696-E697
Author(s):  
E.A. Omari ◽  
Y. Song ◽  
J. Christian ◽  
E.S. Paulson ◽  
B.A. Erickson ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (6Part7) ◽  
pp. 166-166
Author(s):  
M Lin ◽  
W D' Souza ◽  
G Lasio ◽  
W Lu ◽  
K Prado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
4D Ct ◽  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6Part4) ◽  
pp. 3344-3344
Author(s):  
J Uh ◽  
MJ Krasin ◽  
JT Lucas ◽  
C Tinkle ◽  
TE Merchant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document