Loss of Tumor Suppressor DAB2IP Correlates With Decreased Biochemical Recurrence-free Survival in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Radiation Therapy

75 Background: High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with greater risk of biochemical recurrence and cancer specific lethality. A multi-modal treatment is required for this group of patients, comprising surgery as part of it. However, the role of surgery as monotherapy is still under investigation. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of surgical margins on biochemical recurrence (BCR) among patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) since the start of our robotic program. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively collected database of 5695 minimally invasive prostatectomies performed between 2000 and 2015. Clinical, pathological and oncological outcomes were evaluated in patients fulfilling Damico´s high risk characteristics. Primary endpoint was BCR, defined as post-operative PSA ≥ 0,2. Patients with neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were excluded. BCR was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate variables associated with BCR. Results: We identified 199 high-risk PCa patients treated with RARP during the study period. Gleason score ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 20 and clinical stage ≥ T2c were present in 44%, 35% and 11% of the patients, respectively. The rate of positive surgical margins was 25%. With a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile 12 – 34 months), 31% of the patients had BCR. Five-year BCR-free survival was 34,5%. Gleason score ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 20 and positive surgical margins were not predictors of BCR. A positive correlation of pathological stage ≥ T3 and BCR was found with (HR = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.2-6.9). Conclusions: The 5-years BCR-free survival was poor despite a low rate of positive surgical margins, when compared to historical series. We found that pathological stage ≥ T3 has a significant correlation with the BCR and that negative surgical margins do not assure good prognosis for high-risk patients.

Download Full-text

Impact of testosterone replacement therapy after radiation therapy on prostate cancer outcomes.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.99 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 99-99

Author(s):

Reith Sarkar ◽

J Kellogg Parsons ◽

John Paul Einck ◽

Arno James Mundt ◽

A. Karim Kader ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Radiation Therapy ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Biochemical Recurrence ◽

Testosterone Replacement ◽

Testosterone Replacement Therapy ◽

Recurrence Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Treatment Groups

99 Background: Currently there is little data to guide the use of testosterone replacement therapy in prostate cancer patients who have received radiation therapy (RT). We sought to evaluate the impact of post-RT testosterone replacement on prostate cancer outcomes in a large national cohort. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. We identified node-negative and non-metastatic prostate cancer patients diagnosed between 2001-2015 treated with RT. We excluded patients for missing covariate and follow-up data. Receipt of testosterone was coded as a time-dependent covariate. Other covariates included: age, Charlson Comorbidity index, diagnosis year, body mass index, race, PSA, clinical T/N/M stage, Gleason score, and receipt of hormone therapy. We evaluated prostate cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and biochemical recurrence free survival using multivariable Cox regression. Results: Our cohort included 41,544 patients, of whom 544 (1.3%) received testosterone replacement after RT. There were no differences in Charlson comorbidity, clinical T stage, median pre-treatment PSA or Gleason score between treatment groups. Testosterone patients were more likely to be of younger age, non-black, have a lower median post-treatment PSA nadir (0.1 vs. 0.2; p < 0.001), have higher BMI, and have used hormone therapy (46.7% vs 40.3%; p = 0.003). Median duration of ADT usage was equivalent between treatment groups (testosterone: 185 days vs. non-testosterone: 186 days, p = 0.77). The median time from RT to TRT was 3.52 years. After controlling for differences in covariates between treatment groups, we found no difference in prostate cancer specific mortality (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.62-1.67; p = 0.95), overall survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.84-1.24; p = 0.86), non-cancer mortality (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.82-1.27; p = 0.86) biochemical recurrence free survival (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.90-1.28; p = 0.45). Conclusions: Our results suggest that testosterone replacement is safe in prostate cancer patients who have received RT. Prospective data are required to confirm the safety of post-RT testosterone replacement.

Download Full-text