scholarly journals Ultra-Low Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Cryotherapy versus Radiation Therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. E234-E235
Author(s):  
M.M. Gestaut ◽  
R.N. Schurr ◽  
W. Cai ◽  
D. Olek ◽  
N. Deb ◽  
...  
Cancer ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (9) ◽  
pp. 2180-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua H. Petit ◽  
Ming-Hui Chen ◽  
Marian Loffredo ◽  
Brenda Sussman ◽  
Andrew A. Renshaw ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4657-4657
Author(s):  
Simon P. Kim ◽  
R. Jeffrey Karnes ◽  
Paul Linh Nguyen ◽  
Bradley C. Leibovich ◽  
Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss ◽  
...  

4657 Background: While active surveillance (AS) is well recognized as an acceptable treatment strategy for low-risk prostate cancer (PC), the extent to which radiation oncologists and urologists perceive AS as effective and routinely recommend it to patients is unknown. Therefore, we sought to assess the attitudes and treatment recommendations for low-risk PC from a national survey of PC specialists. Methods: A mail survey was sent to a population-based sample of 1,439 physicians in the U.S. from late 2011 and early 2012. Physicians were queried about their attitudes regarding AS and treatment recommendations for patients diagnosed with low-risk PC (PSA<10 ng/dl; T1c; Gleason 6 in one of twelve cores). Pearson Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression were used to test for differences in attitudes and treatment recommendations by physician demographics, compensation structure, primary place of employment, and specialty. Results: Overall, 321 radiation oncologists and 322 urologists completed the survey for a 45% response rate. Most physicians reported that AS is effective for low-risk PC (71%) and stated that they were comfortable routinely recommending AS (67%). Urologists were more likely to agree that AS is effective (77% vs. 67%; p=0.005) and were comfortable recommending AS (74% vs. 61%; p=0.001) compared with radiation oncologists. Most physicians recommended radical prostatectomy (47%) or radiation therapy (32%), but fewer endorsed AS (21%) for low-risk disease. After adjusting for physician covariates, radiation oncologists were more likely to recommend radiation therapy (OR: 10.97; p<0.001), while urologists were more likely to recommend surgery (OR: 4.69; p<0.001) and AS (OR: 2.18; p=0.001) for low-risk PC. Conclusions: Although AS is widely viewed as effective by both radiation oncologists and urologists, most urologists continue to recommend surgery, while most radiation oncologists recommend radiation therapy. Our results may explain in part the relatively low contemporary use of AS in the U.S.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document