scholarly journals Improving Target Volume Identification Using Biomechanical Model-Based Deformable Image Registration in MRI-Guided CT-Based Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. E308-E309
Author(s):  
Y. Rong ◽  
B.A. Dyer ◽  
S.H. Benedict ◽  
C. Wright ◽  
J.S. Mayadev
Brachytherapy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. S31
Author(s):  
Lauren Tait ◽  
Sonja Dieterich ◽  
Jihoon Lim ◽  
Jon-Paul Hunt ◽  
Richard K. Valicenti ◽  
...  

Brachytherapy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren M. Tait ◽  
David Hoffman ◽  
Stanley Benedict ◽  
Richard Valicenti ◽  
Jyoti S. Mayadev

Brachytherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 953-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swamidas V. Jamema ◽  
Umesh Mahantshetty ◽  
Else Andersen ◽  
Karsten Ø. Noe ◽  
Thomas S. Sørensen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 1510-1519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Christian Lindegaard ◽  
Lars Ulrik Fokdal ◽  
Søren Kynde Nielsen ◽  
Jens Juul-Christensen ◽  
Kari Tanderup

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Yang ◽  
Xiaoliang Liu ◽  
Ke Hu ◽  
Jie Qiu ◽  
Fuquan Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To compare irradiation dose to the second and third portions of duodenum (Duo2 and Duo3) with a new refined and old delineation method of para-aortic region for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) receiving prophylactic extended-field radiotherapy (EFRT). Methods Twenty consecutive patients with LACC were treated with prophylactic EFRT from January 2016 to January 2017 at our institute. Two delineation methods of para-aortic region were designed for each patient, the old delineation method ensured a full coverage of aortic and inferior vena cava, while the right paracaval region above L3 was omitted from CTV in the new delineation method. Patients received a dose of 50.4Gy in 28 fractions for PCTV and a dose of 60.2Gy in 28 fractions for PGTV with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMRT). The dose delivered to Duo2 and Duo3 with these two delineation methods were compared. Results All treatment plans achieved excellent target volume coverage with 95% of PCTV receiving 50.4Gy and 95% of PGTV receiving 60.2Gy. There was no difference between delineation methods in low dose level (V5, V10, V15, V20, V25) for Duo2 and Duo3. The V30, V35, V40, V45, V50, Dmax, Dmean and D2cc for Duo2 with the new and old delineation methods were 55.76% vs 80.54% (P = 0.009), 34.72% vs 70.91% (P < 0.001), 18.69% vs 55.46% (P < 0.001), 8.20% vs 41.49% (P < 0.001), 1.86% vs 21.60% (P < 0.001), 49.58Gy vs 52.91Gy (P = 0.002), 30.38Gy vs 39.22Gy (P = 0.001) and 37.90Gy vs 48.64Gy (P < 0.001) respectively. For Duo3, the new delineation method achieved significant advantages in V30, V35, V40, V45, V50 and Dmean over the old one (96.82% vs 99.25%, P = 0.021; 89.65% vs 97.21%, P = 0.001; 79.50% vs 93.18%, P < 0.001; 65.63% vs 82.93%, P < 0.001; 43.39% vs 65.60%, P < 0.001; 46.09Gy vs 49.24Gy, P < 0.001), no deference was observed regarding D2cc and Dmax with these two delineation methods. Conclusion With the new delineation method of para-aortic area in prophylactic EFRT, significant reduction of irradiation dose to the second and third portions of duodenum in high dose area was obtained. This may further lower the incidence of duodenal toxicity when performing prophylactic EFRT for patients with LACC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document