scholarly journals Cosmetic Outcome and Late Breast Toxicity After Intraoperative Radiation Therapy as a Single Modality or as a Boost Using the Intrabeam® Device: A Prospective Study

Author(s):  
S. Key ◽  
P.F. Dupre ◽  
V. Conan ◽  
O. Pradier ◽  
U. Schick
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 83-83
Author(s):  
V. Elayne Arterbery ◽  
Pamela Johnson

83 Background: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) has been described for patients with early-stage breast cancer. The randomized phase III TARGiT trial demonstrated similar recurrence rates to WBI and a lower overall toxicity profile. IORT-related effects and early postoperative outcome were assessed. We report our clinical experience using a 50 Kv EBX HDR radiotherapy delivery system using a balloon technique. We assessed institutional postoperative complications, clinical outcome and histological findings in patients undergoing IORT for breast cancer on a physician sponsored study. Methods: 22 patients (median age 71 years, negative LN and tumor less than 3 cm) underwent lumpectomy, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, and concurrent IORT from December 2010 to January 2013. 18 were treated on the study and 4 refused enrollment and elected to be treated off protocol. Patients received IORT (20 Gy) during breast conserving surgery using an EBX technique. WBI was added according to clinical guidelines. Cosmetic results and quality of life were evaluated. Results: Postoperative complications and toxicity was rare without grade 3/4 toxicities. The most frequent postoperative side effects were palpable seroma (8.3%). Erythema grade 1-2 of the breast was found in (13%); whereas in some (3.4%), mastitis. In 80% of the cases patient had IFDCA, the remainder DCIS and tumor size ranged between 0.7 and 2.6 cm (median = 1.0cm). At median 1 year follow-up, no patient suffered a local recurrence. Cosmetic outcome was perceived excellent in most patients and 100% would recommend the procedure. One patient required WBI due to close margins at re-excision. No patient had positive SLN on final path. Conclusions: IORT using electronic brachytherapy as part of breast conservation is safe. The potential advantages of IORT are minimal time needed for cellular repopulation between surgery and radiation treatment, cosmetic outcome and significant logistical advantages and reduced cost. Careful surgical assessment minimizes the need for WBI. Longer follow-up will determine clinical results for cosmetic outcome and local control.


2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-118
Author(s):  
Isabel Linares-Galiana ◽  
Miguel Angel Berenguer-Frances ◽  
Rut Cañas-Cortés ◽  
Monica Pujol-Canadell ◽  
Silvia Comas-Antón ◽  
...  

Abstract A detailed understanding of the interactions and the best dose-fractionation scheme of radiation to maximize antitumor immunity have not been fully established. In this study, the effect on the host immune system of a single dose of 20 Gy through intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) on the surgical bed in low-risk breast cancer patients undergoing conserving breast cancer has been assessed. Peripheral blood samples from 13 patients were collected preoperatively and at 48 h and 3 and 10 weeks after the administration of radiation. We performed a flow cytometry analysis for lymphocyte subpopulations, natural killer cells (NK), regulatory T cells (Treg) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). We observed that the subpopulation of NK CD56+high CD16+ increased significantly at 3 weeks after IORT (0.30–0.42%, P < 0.001), while no changes were found in immunosuppressive profile, CD4+CD25+Foxp3+Helios+ Treg cells, granulocytic MDSCs (G-MDSCs) and monocytic MDSCs (Mo-MDSCs). A single dose of IORT may be an effective approach to improve antitumor immunity based on the increase in NK cells and the non-stimulation of immunosuppressive cells involved in immune escape. These findings support future combinations of IORT with immunotherapy, if they are confirmed in a large cohort of breast cancer patients.


1992 ◽  
Vol 166 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHOGO YAMADA ◽  
YOSHIHIRO TAKAI ◽  
KENJI NEMOTO ◽  
YOSHIHIRO OGAWA ◽  
YOSHIHISA KAKUTO ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document