scholarly journals The Feasibility of Radiotherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: An Initial Report from ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance) Trial

Author(s):  
Laurie W. Cuttino ◽  
Linda McCall ◽  
Charlotte Kubicky ◽  
Karla V. Ballman ◽  
Huong Le-Petross ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 2858-2866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari M. Rosenkranz ◽  
Karla Ballman ◽  
Linda McCall ◽  
Charlotte Kubicky ◽  
Laurie Cuttino ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas W. Arthur ◽  
Kathryn A. Winter ◽  
Henry M. Kuerer ◽  
Bruce Haffty ◽  
Laurie Cuttino ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS657-TPS657
Author(s):  
Melody A. Cobleigh ◽  
Stewart J. Anderson ◽  
Thomas B. Julian ◽  
Kalliopi P. Siziopikou ◽  
Douglas W. Arthur ◽  
...  

TPS657 Background: Asignificant amount of DCIS is ER negative and/or overexpresses HER2. This provides an opportunity to test molecular therapy in DCIS. In xenograft models and cell lines, T boosts RT effectiveness. In T-treated HER2+ patients, apoptosis occurs within 1 wk of single agent T use, with T found in ductal aspirates. Ample safety evidence for T exists. T given during whole breast irradiation (WBI) may improve results for Lx-resected HER2+ DCIS. A trial to examine this question will enhance the understanding of breast tumor biology and the prevention of such tumors and could possibly extend breast-conserving surgery benefits for women with DCIS. Methods: After Lx for pure DCIS, each patient’s DCIS lesion is centrally tested for HER2 by IHC analysis. HER2 2+ tumors undergo FISH analysis. HER2 3+ or FISH+ patients can be randomly assigned to 2 doses of T, 3 weeks apart during WBI or to WBI alone. Women ≥18 yrs. with a margin-clear Lx for pure DCIS, with ECOG status 0/1 who are and clinically or pathologically node negative are eligible. Centrally tested DCIS must be HER2 +. ER and/or PR status must be known before randomization. Primary aims are to determine if T decreases ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence, ipsilateral skin cancer recurrence, or ipsilateral DCIS. Secondary aims are to determine the benefit of T in preventing regional or distant recurrence and contralateral invasive breast cancer or DCIS. B-43 will determine if DFS, recurrence-free interval, and OS can be improved with the use of T. 2000 patients will be accrued over 7.9 yrs, with a definitive analysis of primary endpoints performed at163 ipsilateral breast cancer events (7.5 - 8 yrs. after protocol initiation) with an 80% power to detect a hazard reduction of 36%, from 1.73 ipsilateral breast cancer events per 100 pt-yrs to 1.11 events per 100 pt-yrs. The 36% observed reduction in the hazard of IIBCR-SCR-DCIS on the T arm is based on a projection of 40% hazard reduction if the compliance were perfect, with a 10% noncompliance rate. As of 12-31-11, 763 patients have been randomized. NCT00769379 Grant support: PHS NCI-U10-CA-69651, -12027, and NCI P30-CA-14599 from the US NCI and Genentech, Inc.


Author(s):  
Heran Deng ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Tingting Hu ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Yaping Yang ◽  
...  

Purpose Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) is associated with a higher risk of later breast cancer. However, whether AH found at margins in patients with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) needs re-excision is not well-defined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of atypical hyperplasia at the surgical margins on the local recurrence and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with NAC and BCS. Methods A retrospective analysis comparing patients who received NAC with AH and received no re-excision to those without AH at the margins of BCS was performed. Results 323 patients were included in this study. The 5-year rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) were 6% and 4.5% in patients with and without AH, respectively. Distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) at 5 years was 81.2% in the AH group, and 88.1% in the no-AH group. No significant differences were observed among the two groups in terms of IBTR, DMFS, or OS. Conclusion Our study suggests that AH involved at the surgical margins of BCS in patients who received NAC does not increase the risk of ipsilateral breast cancer, and there is insufficient evidence for surgeon to further resect AH found at the margins of BCS in these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document