scholarly journals Adenocarcinoma occurring from a sigmoid colostomy 20 years after Hartmann's procedure for rectal cancer: A case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 106660
Author(s):  
Yusuke Kitagawa ◽  
Shigeo Hirasaki ◽  
Michiya Bando
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1583-1589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Westerduin ◽  
Gijsbert D. Musters ◽  
Anna A. W. van Geloven ◽  
Marinke Westerterp ◽  
Erwin van der Harst ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elin Mariusdottir ◽  
Fredrik Jörgren ◽  
Amelia Mondlane ◽  
Jens Wikström ◽  
Marie-Louise Lydrup ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Results of previous studies regarding pelvic sepsis after Hartmann’s procedure (HP) for rectal cancer have been inconsistent and few studies report the risk factors. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of pelvic sepsis after HP, identify risk factors and describe when as well as how pelvic sepsis was diagnosed and treated. Methods Data were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry on all patients undergoing HP for rectal cancer in the county of Skåne from 2007–2017. Patients diagnosed with pelvic sepsis were compared with patients without pelvic sepsis and risk factors for developing pelvic sepsis were analysed in a multivariable model. Results A total of 252 patients were included in the study, with 149 (59%) males, and a median age of 75 years (range 20–92). Altogether, 27 patients (11%) were diagnosed with pelvic sepsis. Risk factors for developing pelvic sepsis were neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR 7.96, 95% CI 2.54–35.36) and BMI over 25 kg/m2 (OR 5.26, 95% CI 1.80–19.50). Median time from operation to diagnosis was 21 days (range 5-355) with 11 (40%) patients diagnosed beyond 30 days postoperatively. The majority of cases 19 (70%) were treated conservatively and none needed major surgery. Conclusion Pelvic sepsis occurred in 11% of patients. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and higher BMI were significant risk factors for developing pelvic sepsis. Forty percent of patients were diagnosed later than 30 days postoperatively and most patients were successfully treated conservatively. Our findings suggest that HP is a valid treatment option for rectal cancer when anastomosis is inappropriate, even in patients receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 83-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros Siaperas ◽  
Argyrios Ioannidis ◽  
Andreas Skarpas ◽  
Argiris Angelopoulos ◽  
Ioannis Drikos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
ANDERSON RECH LAZZARON ◽  
INGRID SILVEIRA ◽  
PAULINE SIMAS MACHADO ◽  
DANIEL C DAMIN

ABSTRACT Background: although preservation of bowel continuity is a major goal in rectal cancer surgery, a colorectal anastomosis may be considered an unacceptably high-risk procedure, particularly for patients with multiple comorbidities. We aimed to assess rates of surgical complications in rectal cancer patients according to the type of procedure they had undergone. Materials and Methods: this cohort included all rectal cancer patients undergoing elective resection at a referral academic hospital over 16 years. There were three study groups according to the type of performed operation: (1) rectal resection with anastomosis without defunctioning stoma (DS); (2) rectal resection with anastomosis and DS; and (3) Hartmann’s procedure (HP). Postoperative complications and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: four-hundred and two patients were studied. The 118 patients in group 3 were significantly older (>10 years), had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and more ASA class ≥3 than patients in the other two groups. Sixty-seven patients (16.7%) had Clavien-Dindo complications grade ≥ III, corresponding to an incidence of 11.8%, 20.9%, and 14.4% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p=0.10). Twenty-nine patients (7.2%) had major septic complications that required reoperation, with an incidence of 10.8%, 8.2% and 2.5% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p=0.048). Twenty-one percent of the group 2 patients did not undergo the stoma closure after a 24-month follow-up. Conclusion: HP was associated with a lower incidence of reoperation due to intra-abdominal septic complications. This procedure remains an option for patients in whom serious surgical complications are anticipated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document