Physiological and biochemical response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars to zinc application under drought stress

2021 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 114069
Author(s):  
Jivani Manvelian ◽  
Weria Weisany ◽  
Nawroz Abdul-razzak Tahir ◽  
Hamid Jabbari ◽  
Marjan Diyanat
Ecotoxicology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1668-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gui-Fang Guan ◽  
You-Shao Wang ◽  
Hao Cheng ◽  
Zhao-Yu Jiang ◽  
Jiao Fei

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
何建社 HE Jianshe ◽  
张利 ZHANG Li ◽  
刘千里 LIU Qianli ◽  
朱欣伟 ZHU Xinwei ◽  
刘兴良 LIU Xingliang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
ARADHNA KUMARI ◽  
IM KHAN ◽  
ANIL KUMAR SINGH ◽  
SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH

Poplar clone Kranti was selected to assess the morphological, physiological and biochemical responses under drought at different levels of water stress, as it is a common clone used to be grown in Uttarakhand for making paper and plywood. The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different watering regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity) and changes in physiological and biochemical parameters related with drought tolerance were recorded. Alterations in physiological (i.e. decrease in relative water content) and biochemical parameters (i.e. increase in proline and soluble sugar content and build-up of malondialdehyde by-products) occurred in all the three levels of water stress, although drought represented the major determinant. Drought treatments (75%, 50% and 25% FC) decreased plant height, radial stem diameter, harvest index, total biomass content and RWC in all the three watering regimes compared to control (100% FC). Biochemical parameters like proline, soluble sugar and MDA content increased with severity and duration of stress, which helped plants to survive under severe stress. It was analyzed that for better wood yield poplar seedlings should avail either optimum amount of water (amount nearly equal to field capacity of soil) or maximum withdrawal up to 75% of field capacity up to seedling establishment period (60 days). Furthermore, this study manifested that acclimation to drought stress is related with the rapidity, severity, and duration of the drought event of the poplar species.


Author(s):  
Alam Sher ◽  
Muhammad Mudassir Maqbool ◽  
Javed Iqbal ◽  
Muhammad Nadeem ◽  
Sajid Faiz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Pooran GOLKAR ◽  
Esmaeil HAMZEH ◽  
Seyed Ali Mohammad MIRMOHAMMADY MAIBODY

<p>Improvement of elite safflower genotypes for drought-tolerance is hampered by a deficiency of effective selection criteria. The present study evaluated 100 genotypes of safflower in terms of their drought tolerance over a period of three years (2016–2018) under both non-stress and drought-stress conditions. The eight drought-tolerance indices of tolerance index (TOL), mean productivity (MP), geometric mean productivity (GMP), stress susceptibility index (SSI), stress tolerance index (STI), yield stability index (YSI), drought resistance index (DI), and harmonic mean (HARM) were calculated based on seed yield under drought (Y<sub>s</sub>) and non-drought (Y<sub>p</sub>) conditions. A high genetic variation was found in drought tolerance among the genotypes studied. The MP, GMP, and STI indices were able to discriminate between tolerant and drought-sensitive genotypes. Plots of the first and second principal components identified drought-tolerant genotypes averaged over the three study years. Cluster analysis divided the genotypes into three distinct groups using the drought tolerance indices. Ultimately, eight genotypes (namely, G<sub>3</sub>, G<sub>11</sub>, G<sub>13</sub>, G<sub>24</sub>, G<sub>33</sub>, G<sub>47</sub>, G<sub>58</sub>, and G<sub>61</sub>) from different origins were detected as more tolerant to drought stress suitable for use in safflower breeding programs in drought-affected areas. The most tolerant and susceptible genotypes could be exploited to produce mapping populations for drought tolerance breeding programs in safflower.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 841-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaomin Chen ◽  
Lingling Qiu ◽  
Haipeng Guo ◽  
Yang Wang ◽  
Huwei Yuan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document