BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF NEW ACHILLES TENDON RUPTURE REPAIR TECHNIQUE THE “GIFTBOX” VERSUS THE KRACKOW TECHNIQUE IN NEW ZEALAND WHITE RABBITS: AN EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL STUDY

Injury ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hafiz Hashim ◽  
Seow Hui Teo ◽  
Mohamed Zubair Mohamed Al Fayyadh ◽  
Sahrinanah Mappiare ◽  
Wuey Min Ng ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0049
Author(s):  
Caroline Williams ◽  
Christopher P. Miller ◽  
John Y. Kwon

Category: Trauma; Ankle; Sports Introduction/Purpose: Achilles tendon rupture repair has undergone several changes in the last ten years, aiming to minimize complications while maximizing clinical and functional outcomes. Selecting a less invasive approach instead of traditional open incision has shown through various studies to generate excellent results and significantly reduce post-operative infections. Choice of patient positioning during operative repair has also shown to be of great impact, with prone positioning being associated with elevated surgical times and anesthetic requirements, thus secondary affecting clinical outcomes. Other complications associated with prone positioning include neuropraxia and increased risk of iatrogenic ophthalmologic insults as compared to the supine position. This case report evaluates clinical outcomes of patients following treatment of Achilles rupture with a novel Medial Mini- Open Supine Achilles Repair Technique. Methods: Patients were selected for case series inclusion after undergoing novel Medial Mini-Open Supine Achilles Repair Technique for acute achilles rupture. Retrospective medical record review for demographic, perioperative and functional data was completed for each patient, with means, range and standard deviations calculated when appropriate. Patients were then followed postoperatively to monitor recovery. At a final follow up visit scheduled no sooner than six months post operatively, outcomes were assessed with three separate Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys; Physical Function, Pain Interference and Depression. Two separate Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) assessments, ADLs and Sport, were also completed. Patients were also assessed for physical pain/discomfort using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: Eighteen patients were included in this study; fifteen male, three female. Mean age was 37.5 years (+-12, range= 20-68). Mean duration of surgery was 31.0 minutes (+- 7.0). Follow up duration averaged 11.8 months (range 6.0-13.5). All patients completed three Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) studies and two Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) surveys. Mean score for the PROMIS Physical Function survey was 52.3 (+-11.5), for Pain Interference, mean= 50.0 (+-7.30), and for Depression, mean=39.5 (+- 6.96). FAAM Sport survey showed a mean=71.3 (+-29.4), with ADLs form responses showing a mean of 90.7 (+-12.7). All patients reported 0/10 pain on Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and overall satisfaction with their outcomes. Conclusion: In reviewing data collected thus far, the Medial Mini-Open Supine Achilles Repair technique shows promise to serve as a viable option for achilles tendon rupture repair; ease of patient positioning preoperatively translates to decreased set up, operative, and sedation time, directly benefiting patients. No complications have been reported at this time; patients have demonstrated excellent outcomes in physical exam in postoperative clinic visits. All patients have expressed satisfaction with their results at final visit.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 247301142096596
Author(s):  
Daniel Carpenter ◽  
Katherine Dederer ◽  
Paul Weinhold ◽  
Joshua N. Tennant

Background: Percutaneous repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) continues to gain in popularity. The primary aim of the study was to review the outcomes of a patient cohort undergoing a novel technique of endoscopic percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable suture. A secondary purpose of this study was to evaluate the basic biomechanical properties of the technique. Methods: A cohort of 30 patients who underwent percutaneous ATR repair was retrospectively analyzed with Achilles Tendon Rupture Scores (ATRS), complications, and additional outcome measures. For a biomechanical analysis portion of the study, 12 cadaveric specimens were paired and randomized to either novel percutaneous repair or open Kessler repair with absorbable suture. These specimens were subjected to 2 phases of cyclical testing (100 cycles 10-43 N followed by 200 cycles 10-86 N) and ultimate strength testing. Results: In the clinical portion of the study we report excellent patient reported outcomes (mean ATRS 94.1), high level of return to sport, and high patient satisfaction. One partial re-rupture was reported but with no major wound or neurologic complications. In the biomechanical portion of the study we found no significant difference in tendon gapping between percutaneous and open repairs in phase 1 of testing. In phase 2, increased gapping occurred between percutaneous (17.8 mm [range 10.7-24.1, SD 6.4]) and open repairs (10.8 mm [range 7.6-14.9, SD 2.7, P = .037]). The ultimate load at failure was not statistically different between the 2 repairs. Conclusions: A percutaneous ATR repair technique using endoscopic assistance and absorbable suture demonstrated low complications and good outcomes in a cohort of patients, with high satisfaction, and excellent functional outcomes including high rates of return to sport. Cadaveric biomechanical testing demonstrated excellent survival during testing and minimal increase in gapping compared with open repair technique, representing sufficient strength to withstand forces seen in early rehabilitation. A percutaneous Achilles tendon repair technique with absorbable suture may minimize risks associated with operative repair while still maintaining the benefit of operative repair. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.


Injury ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 559-564
Author(s):  
Jian Tian ◽  
Rongjun Rui ◽  
Yajun Xu ◽  
Wengbo Yang ◽  
Xueming Chen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ze-yang He ◽  
Ming-xiang Chai ◽  
Yue-ju Liu ◽  
Xiao-ran Zhang ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (Supl 1) ◽  
pp. S32
Author(s):  
João Paulo Primo de Araujo ◽  
Marcus Vinicius Mota Garcia Moreno ◽  
Janice De Souza Guimarães ◽  
Marilton Jorge Torres Gomes ◽  
Túlio Eduardo Marçal Vieira ◽  
...  

Objective: Our study compares the functional outcomes of patients who underwent open repair of the Achilles tendon with those of patients treated with the minimally invasive technique using the percutaneous Achilles repair system (PARS) over a 1-year minimum follow-up period and presents the complication rates for the 2 techniques. Methods: Between 2011 and 2016, 31 patients were reviewed; of these, 20 were included in the study (10 PARS X 10 open repair technique). Patients with chronic Achilles tendon rupture, insertional or bilateral, and patients with a history of surgery or previous ankle pathology that could mask functional outcomes were excluded from the study. The open repair technique was performed via a posteromedial incision to the ankle to repair the tendon and was combined with myotendinous transfer of the flexor hallucis longus tendon, which was fixed with a Biotenodesis screw. The minimally invasive technique was performed using the PARS of the company Arthrex through a small transverse incision at the site of the Achilles tendon rupture. Functional outcomes and complications were collected after at least 1 year of follow-up. Results: Both groups had similar American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores (PARS: 95.3±5.1, open: 96.5±5.1; p=0.604), demonstrating similar functional outcomes. The PARS group had a higher number of complications than the open repair group (PARS: 20% x open: 10%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.383). Conclusion: For the treatment of acute Achilles tendon injuries, the PARS and open repair techniques had similar functional outcomes after 1 year of follow-up.


2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 971-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ersin Taşatan ◽  
Tuluhan Yunus Emre ◽  
Demet Tekdöş Demircioğlu ◽  
Bahtiyar Demiralp ◽  
Vecihi Kırdemir

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document