scholarly journals 55.2 CBT: BIOBEHAVIORAL TOOLS FOR PEDIATRIC PAIN MANAGEMENT DURING COVID-19

Author(s):  
Rachel Zoffness
2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn McCleary ◽  
Jacqueline A Ellis ◽  
Betty Rowley

CJEM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huma Ali ◽  
Janeva Kircher ◽  
Christine Meyers ◽  
Joseph MacLellan ◽  
Samina Ali

AbstractBackgroundUnder-treatment of children’s pain in the emergency department (ED) can have many detrimental effects. Emergency medicine (EM) residents often manage pediatric pain, but their educational needs and perspectives have not been studied.MethodsA novel online survey was administered from May to June 2013 to 122 EM residents at three Canadian universities using a modified Dillman methodology. The survey instrument captured information on training received in pediatric acute pain management, approach to common painful presentations, level of comfort, perceived facilitators, and barriers and attitudes towards pediatric pain.Results56 residents participated (46%), 25 of whom (45%) indicated they had not received any training in pediatric pain assessment. All levels of residents reported they were uncomfortable with pain assessment in 0-2 year olds (p=0.07); level of comfort with assessment increased with years of training for patients aged 2-12 years (p=0.02). When assessing children with disabilities, 83% of respondents (45/54) indicated they were ‘extremely’ or ‘somewhat’ uncomfortable. Sixty-nine percent (38/55) had received training on how to treat pediatric pain. All residents reported they were more comfortable using pain medication for a 9 year old, as compared to a 1 year old (oral oxycodone p<0.001, oral morphine p<0.001, IV morphine p=0.004). The preferred methods to learn about children’s pain management were role-modeling (61%) and lectures (57%). The top challenges in pain management were with non-verbal, younger, or developmentally delayed patients.ConclusionCanadian EM residents report receiving inadequate training in pediatric pain management, and are particularly uneasy with younger or developmentally disabled children. Post-graduate curricula should be adjusted to correct these self-identified weaknesses in children’s pain management.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 143-187
Author(s):  
Kim-Phuong T. Nguyen ◽  
Nancy L. Glass

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. e18
Author(s):  
Kelley Kelly ◽  
Maureen Palmer

1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 591-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey L. Cohen ◽  
Ronald L. Blount ◽  
Rachelle Jansevics Cohen ◽  
Elizabeth R. Schaen ◽  
Jon F. Zaff

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Brenda Castillo Jiminian ◽  
Fatima Osmanovic ◽  
Angela Starkweather

Author(s):  
Anita M. Unruh ◽  
Patrick J. McGrath

The problem of pain has always concerned humankind, as pain is a compelling call for attention and a signal to escape. Early efforts to understand pain, and its origins, features, and treatment reflected the duality between spiritual conceptualizations of pain and physiological explanations depending on the predominance of such views in a given culture. When spiritual perspectives dominated, prayer, amulets, supplication, and religious rites controlled approaches to pain treatment. Herbal remedies were often part of such strategies and might themselves been physiologically effective. In ancient writings about pain and disease, treatments for children were often given alongside discussions about the health of women. In this chapter, we trace early approaches to pain in children to the modern era, highlighting points of transition and improvements in pediatric pain management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document