Severe cutaneous drug reactions, such as Steven-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, in pediatric patients, with an emphasis on recently approved medications

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. AB260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Punit S. Ramrakha ◽  
Kevin P. Moore ◽  
Amir H. Sam

This chapter discusses dermatological emergencies, including cutaneous drug reactions, erythroderma, urticaria and angio-oedema, autoimmune bullous disease, eczema herpeticum, herpes zoster, generalized pustular psoriasis, and Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 468-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Wong ◽  
Andrey Augusto Malvestiti ◽  
Mariana de Figueiredo Silva Hafner

SUMMARY Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are uncommon, acute and potentially life-threatening adverse cutaneous drug reactions. These pathologies are considered a hypersensitivity reaction and can be triggered by drugs, infections and malignancies. The drugs most often involved are allopurinol, some antibiotics, including sulfonamides, anticonvulsants such as carbamazepine, and some non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Necrosis of keratinocytes is manifested clinically by epidermal detachment, leading to scalded skin appearance. The rash begins on the trunk with subsequent generalization, usually sparing the palmoplantar areas. Macular lesions become purplish, and epidermal detachment occurs, resulting in flaccid blisters that converge and break, resulting in extensive sloughing of necrotic skin. Nikolsky's sign is positive in perilesional skin. SJS and TEN are considered to be two ends of the spectrum of one disease, differing only by their extent of skin detachment. Management of patients with SJS or TEN requires three measures: removal of the offending drug, particularly drugs known to be high-risk; supportive measures and active interventions. Early diagnosis of the disease, recognition of the causal agent and the immediate withdrawal of the drug are the most important actions, as the course of the disease is often rapid and fatal.


2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
pp. 1017-1021

Background: Drug hypersensitivity is the most common adverse effect of drug use. Major cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) represent the higher rates of morbidity and mortality, with up to 5.2% of cases. Current reports revealed the non-aromatic antiepileptic drugs had increasing rates of CADRs from the past. Objective: To study the clinical presentations and the severity of CADRs due to aromatic and non-aromatic antiepileptic drugs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with inpatients and outpatients with CADRs receiving antiepileptic drugs in Phramongkutklao Hospital between January 2009 and December 2018. Results: Among 77 patients with CADRs, 61 patients received aromatic antiepileptic drugs and 16 patients took non-aromatic antiepileptic drugs. Among the patients with aromatic antiepileptic drugs 52.46% developed minor cutaneous drug reactions. The rest, 47.54%, developed major cutaneous drug reactions including Steven-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) 13.11% and drug rash with eosinophil and systemic symptoms (DRESS) 31.15%. Among the patients with non-aromatic antiepileptic drugs, 62.5% developed minor cutaneous drug reactions. The rest, 37.5%, developed major CADRs including SJS/TEN 12.5% and DRESS 25%. Of the patients receiving aromatic antiepileptic, the major CADRs group showed significant higher level of eosinophil compared with minor CADRs (10.35% and 2.1%, respectively, p<0.001). The study showed significant higher alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels in 138.5 IU/L among patient with major CADRs who received aromatic antiepileptic drugs compared with minor CADRs in 87 IU/L (p=0.006). No significant difference of laboratory was found among CADRs patients in non-aromatic group. Conclusion: Aromatic antiepileptic drugs tended to cause more severe cutaneous drug reactions than non-aromatic antiepileptic drugs, especially DRESS. The internal organ involvements were significantly identified in the aromatic antiepileptic group regarding to serum eosinophil and ALP level. Keywords: Adverse skin reaction, Aromatic antiepileptic drugs, Non-aromatic antiepileptic drug


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 426-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia A. Charlton ◽  
Victoria Harris ◽  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Erin Mewton ◽  
Chris Jackson ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Wolkenstein ◽  
Oliver Chosidow ◽  
Marie-Laure Fléchet ◽  
Odile Robbiola ◽  
Muriel Paul ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document