Results of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in primary congenital glaucoma

Author(s):  
M. Reza Razeghinejad ◽  
Saeed Kaffashan ◽  
Mohammad H. Nowroozzadeh
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Pakravan ◽  
Hamed Esfandiari ◽  
Shahin Yazdani ◽  
Azadeh Doozandeh ◽  
Zahra Dastborhan ◽  
...  

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in refractory primary congenital glaucoma as well as primary procedure in aphakic glaucoma. Method: In this retrospective study, medical records of patients who underwent Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation for refractory glaucoma and aphakic glaucoma were reviewed. Primary outcome measures were the surgical success defined as intraocular pressure ≤21 mm Hg and decreased ≥20% and no secondary glaucoma surgery. Secondary outcome measures were the number of glaucoma medications, complications, best corrected visual acuity, and intraocular pressure. Results: A total of 62 eyes of refractory primary congenital glaucoma patients (group 1) and 33 eyes of aphakic glaucoma patients (group 2) were included in our study. Mean follow-up was 51 ± 33 months in group 1 and 49 ± 41 months in group 2 (p = 0.82). The cumulative probability of success was 90% in both groups at the first year; however, the success rate was 52.5% in group 1 and 71.5% in group 2 at 5 years’ follow-up visit. In group 1, the mean intraocular pressure ± standard deviation was 33.1 ± 8.6 mm Hg at the baseline and decreased to 17.1 ± 5.3 mm Hg at 1 year and 18.5 ± 6.4 at 3 years postoperatively (all p’s < 0.001). Corresponding values for group 2 were 28.9 ± 6.1, 15.2 ± 4.6, and 16.0 ± 5.9 mm Hg, respectively (all p’s < 0.001). The baseline number of glaucoma medications was 3 ± 0.7 that decreased to 2 ± 0.8 at final follow-up (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation has a moderate success rate in the management of refractory primary congenital glaucoma with an increased chance of tube-related complications. The surgical success rate is higher in case of primary Ahmed glaucoma valve implant for aphakic glaucoma with acceptable safety profile.


2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shantha Balekudaru ◽  
Tamonash Basu ◽  
Parveen Sen ◽  
Pramod Bhende ◽  
Vijaya Lingam ◽  
...  

AimsTo assess the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of management of delayed suprachoroidal haemorrhage (DSCH) in children who had undergone Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation.MethodsA retrospective case-control study of eyes which developed DSCH in children <18 years of age who underwent surgery between January 2009 and December 2017 with a follow-up of at least 2 months was performed. Nine cases were compared with 27 age, gender and surgeon matched controls who had undergone surgery during this period.ResultsThe incidence of DSCH was 4.7% (95% CL 1.5% to 7.7%, 9 eyes of 191 children). There were no significant differences between cases and controls in baseline details except for the number of intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering medications (p=0.01) and follow-up period (p=0.001). Risk factors identified on univariate analysis (p≤0.1) were axial length (p=0.02), diagnosis of primary congenital glaucoma (p=0.05), postoperative hypotony (p=0.07) and aphakia (p=0.1). None of them were found to be significant on multivariate analysis. Five eyes, three with retinal apposition and two with retinal detachment, underwent surgical drainage. There were no significant differences in the outcomes of eyes which underwent drainage compared with those which did not. Failures, defined as IOP>18 mm Hg despite use of medications, loss of light perception, phthisis or removal of the implant were more frequent in cases (three eyes, 33.3%) compared with controls (four eyes, 14.8%) (p=0.002).ConclusionsNone of the risk factors analysed in our series proved to be significant. Failures were more common in eyes with choroidal haemorrhage, despite surgical intervention.


Author(s):  
Maryam Yadgari ◽  
Fatemeh Vafaei ◽  
Farsad Noorizadeh ◽  
Soheila Sobhani ◽  
Kourosh Sheibani

2014 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enyr S. Arcieri ◽  
Jayter S. Paula ◽  
Rodrigo Jorge ◽  
Kleyton A. Barella ◽  
Rafael S. Arcieri ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document