A Post-Hoc Analysis of Improvement in Individual Nasal Symptoms by Their Baseline Severity Following Treatment with Ciclesonide Hydrofluoroalkane Nasal Aerosol in Patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. AB187
Author(s):  
Dale E. Mohar ◽  
Holly Huang ◽  
John Karafilidis
2008 ◽  
Vol 147 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Anolik ◽  
Robert A. Nathan ◽  
Eric Schenkel ◽  
Melvyn R. Danzig ◽  
Davis Gates ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. AB199-AB199
Author(s):  
W. Carr ◽  
S.R. Shah ◽  
W. Wheeler ◽  
H. Sacks

Allergy ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Svensson ◽  
M. Andersson ◽  
L Greiff ◽  
L-O. Blychert ◽  
C. G. A. Persson

Author(s):  
Sagar Panchal ◽  
Saiprasad Patil ◽  
Hanmant Barkate

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> To evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of Montelukast 10 mg+levocetirizine 5 mg  FDC compared to either montelukast 10 mg or levocetirizine 5 mg given alone in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) patients.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double blind, parallel group, active controlled study was conducted in 279 SAR patients at 16 sites across India. Efficacy was assessed using daytime nasal symptoms score (Primary efficacy outcome), night-time symptoms score, daytime eye symptom score, patient's global evaluation, physician's global evaluation, rhino-conjunctivitis quality-of-life score.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> At end of treatment there was statistically significant evidence from the per protocol analysis that patients on FDC had a greater improvement in change from baseline in daytime nasal symptoms score than patients who received Montelukast (p=0.0266) or Levocetirizine (p=0.0409). These results were consistent with the Intent to treat analysis. Analysis of the secondary efficacy endpoints provided numerically greater improvement in the nighttime symptoms score, daytime eye symptoms score, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life scores in the FDC group as compared to the Montelukast group or Levocetirizine group. The FDC of Montelukast and Levocetirizine was found to be safe and generally well tolerated. The majority of adverse events were mild in severity, resolved without treatment and were unrelated to study medication.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Fixed dose combination of Montelukast and Levocetirizine was safe, generally well tolerated and superior on efficacy compared to Montelukast or Levocetirizine in patients of seasonal allergic rhinitis.</p>


2003 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark S. Dykewicz ◽  
Harold B. Kaiser ◽  
Robert A. Nathan ◽  
Stacey Goode-Sellers ◽  
Cindy K. Cook ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alexander V. Karaulov ◽  
Natalia I. Ilina ◽  
Natalia Shartanova ◽  
Aleksandr Maslakov ◽  
Luiz Lucio

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a disease which affects &#x3e;24% of the population in Russia. Triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) is a corticosteroid used for treating AR. This post hoc analysis assesses the efficacy of intranasal TAA in improving perennial AR (PAR) symptom scores over 4 weeks. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> NASANIF (NCT03317015) was a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, prospective, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial in which patients with PAR were randomized (1:1) to receive TAA or fluticasone propionate (FP) over 4 weeks. Our post hoc analysis evaluates weekly change in PAR symptoms using the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS), overall and for individual symptoms (sneezing, nasal itching, rhinorrhoea, and nasal obstruction). Proportion of patients and time to achieve a ≥50 or ≥75% reduction in rTNSS were assessed. For rTNSS endpoints, a linear mixed-model methodology was used; for time-to-event endpoints, cumulative incidence functions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, in the per-protocol population. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 260 patients, 128 each completed the study and were randomized to receive TAA or FP. From baseline to week 4, the changes in total rTNSS were −7.78 (95% CI: −8.1701 to −7.3967; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and −7.52 (−7.9053 to −7.1320; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) for TAA and FP, respectively. Individual symptoms improved significantly from baseline. The proportion of patients achieving ≥50 and ≥75% reductions in total rTNSS was 88.0 and 67.2%, respectively in the TAA group. No significant differences were observed between the TAA and FP in any analyses. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> TAA produced effective and prolonged improvement of PAR symptoms over a 4-week treatment period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document