scholarly journals Conventional mood stabilizers and/or second-generation antipsychotic drugs in bipolar disorders: A population-based comparison of risk of treatment failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 257 ◽  
pp. 412-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Tournier ◽  
Anke Neumann ◽  
Elodie Pambrun ◽  
Alain Weill ◽  
Jean-Philippe Chaffiol ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1383-1390 ◽  
Author(s):  
István Bitter ◽  
Lajos Katona ◽  
János Zámbori ◽  
Péter Takács ◽  
László Fehér ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
M. Tournier ◽  
A. Cougnard ◽  
B. Bégaud ◽  
A. Thiébaut ◽  
H. Verdoux

Objective:To assess the metabolic impact of adding an antipsychotic to a mood stabilizer or switching a mood stabilizer to an antipsychotic in patients with bipolar disorder.Methods:A retrospective fixed cohort study was conducted through the claims database of the French health care program for the self-employed workers. The study population consisted of 3.172 patients age 18 and over who were exposed to mood stabilizers (i.e. lithium, valproate) a 3 month-period in 2004 without dispensing of non-sedative antipsychotic, antidiabetic or lipid-lowering drugs. The outcome was the occurrence of a metabolic incident over the follow-up period, using the dispensing of an antidiabetic drug as a marker of diabetes and the dispensing of a lipid-lowering drug as a marker of hypercholesterolemia or hypertriglyceridemia. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the metabolic impact of the antipsychotics; using mood stabilizers as a reference. Antipsychotic exposition was stratified in «current» and «recent» (discontinued for less than 6 months) at the time of the metabolic incident.Results:196 patients (6.2%) received a first-generation antipsychotic, 352 (11.1%) a second-generation antipsychotic, 565 (17.8%) a sedative antipsychotic and 367 patients (11.6%) presented with a metabolic incident over the study period. The recent dispensing of a second-generation antipsychotic was associated with the occurrence of a metabolic incident [HR 2.1 (95%CI 1.2-3.7) p=0.006], while current dispensing or dispensing of first-generation antipsychotics were not.Conclusion:Second-generation antipsychotics have a metabolic impact compared to classic mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder.


Author(s):  
Matthew Florczynski

Schizophrenia is a neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by increased function of dopamine in the brain.  Dopamine release is a natural response to reward.  It promotes incentive learning (IL), a process by which neutral stimuli acquire the ability to elicit approach and other responses.  A recent model characterizes dopamine‐mediated IL as a progressive process with early and late stages accompanied by a shift in neural control from the nucleus accumbens (NAc) to the dorsolateral striatum (DLS).  A parallel can be drawn to differences in regionally specific neural responses generated by first‐ and second‐generation antipsychotic drugs (APDs) used to treat schizophrenia.  APDs are dopamine receptor antagonists, but first‐generation APDs affect the NAc and DLS while second‐generation APDs affect primarily the NAc.  We compared the effects of APDs on IL. Rats (N = 48) were trained to press a lever forfood pellets in an operant chamber.  Intraperitoneal injections (1 hr before testing) of the first‐generation APD haloperidol (0,0.05,0.10,0.20 mg/kg) or of the second‐generation APD risperidone (0,0.20,0.40,0.80 mg/kg) induced dose‐dependent suppression of lever pressing on days 1‐4, with the highest dose groups failing to demonstrate any evidence of previous learning on day 5 when tested drug‐free.  On days 16‐20 haloperidol induced a day‐to‐day suppression not seen with risperidone.  The results suggest that the effects of first‐ and second‐generation APDs on learning processes putatively mediated by the NAc and DLS can be differentiated experimentally.  The findings imply that APDs may differentially affect IL inpatients with schizophrenia.  


Author(s):  
Matthew Florczynski

Schizophrenia is a neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by increased function of dopamine in the brain.  Dopamine release is a natural response to reward.  It promotes incentive learning (IL), a process by which neutral stimuli acquire the ability to elicit approach and other responses.  A recent model characterizes dopamine‐mediated IL as a progressive process with early and late stages accompanied by a shift in neural control from the nucleus accumbens (NAc) to the dorsolateral striatum (DLS).  A parallel can be drawn to differences in regionally specific neural responses generated by first‐ and second‐generation antipsychotic drugs (APDs) used to treat schizophrenia.  APDs are dopamine receptor antagonists, but first‐generation APDs affect the NAc and DLS while second‐generation APDs affect primarily the NAc.  We compared the effects of APDs on IL. Rats (N = 48) were trained to press a lever for food pellets in an operant chamber.  Intraperitoneal injections (1 hr before testing) of the first‐generation APD haloperidol (0,0.05,0.10,0.20 mg/kg) or of the second‐generation APD risperidone (0,0.20,0.40,0.80 mg/kg) induced dose‐dependent suppression of lever pressing on days 1‐4, with the highest dose groups failing to demonstrate any evidence of previous learning on day 5 when tested drug‐free.  On days 16‐20, haloperidol induced a day‐to‐day suppression not seen with risperidone.  The results suggest that the effects of first‐ and second‐generation APDs on learning processes putatively mediated by the NAc and DLS can be differentiated experimentally.  The findings imply that APDs may differentially affect IL inpatients with schizophrenia.


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anissa Abi-Dargham ◽  
Marc Laruelle

AbstractMultiple lines of evidence including recent imaging studies suggest that schizophrenia is associated with an imbalance of the dopaminergic system, entailing hyperstimulation of striatal dopamine (DA) D2 receptors and understimulation of cortical DA D1 receptors. This DA endophenotype presumably emerges from the background of a more general synaptic dysconnectivity, involving alterations in N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) and glutamatergic (GLU) functions. Equally important is the fact that this DA dysregulation might further impair NMDA transmission. The first generation antipsychotic (FGA) drugs are characterized by high affinity to and generally high occupancy of D2 receptors. The efficacy of FGAs is limited by a high incidence of extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS). Second generation antipsychotic (SGA) drugs display reduced EPS liability and modest but clinically significant enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Compared to FGAs, the improved therapeutic action of SGAs probably derives from a more moderate D2 receptor blockade. We will review the effects of SGAs on other neurotransmitter systems and conclude by highlighting the importance of therapeutic strategies aimed at directly increasing prefrontal DA, D1 receptor transmission or NMDA transmission to enhance the therapeutic effect of moderate D2 receptor antagonism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document