Cenomanian oyster communities from a tide-dominated eperic ramp in the southern Tethys: A sediment-fauna relationship

Author(s):  
Ramadan Mohamed ◽  
Omar Mohamed ◽  
Alzahraa Adel ◽  
Ahmed Awad Abdelhady
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 290 ◽  
pp. 60-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Álvaro Jiménez Berrocoso ◽  
Stéphane Bodin ◽  
Jonathan Wood ◽  
Stephen E. Calvert ◽  
Jörg Mutterlose ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 882-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Bebej ◽  
Iyad S. Zalmout ◽  
Ahmed A. Abed El-Aziz ◽  
Mohammed Sameh M. Antar ◽  
Philip D. Gingerich

AbstractRemingtonocetidae are Eocene archaeocetes that represent a unique experiment in cetacean evolution. They possess long narrow skulls, long necks, fused sacra, and robust hind limbs. Previously described remingtonocetids are known from middle Eocene Lutetian strata in Pakistan and India. Here we describe a new remingtonocetid, Rayanistes afer, n. gen. n. sp., recovered from a middle to late Lutetian interval of the Midawara Formation in Egypt. The holotype preserves a sacrum with four vertebral centra; several lumbar and caudal vertebrae; an innominate with a complete ilium, ischium, and acetabulum; and a nearly complete femur. The ilium and ischium of Rayanistes are bladelike, rising sharply from the body of the innominate anterior and posterior to the acetabulum, and the acetabular notch is narrow. These features are diagnostic of Remingtonocetidae, but their development also shows that Rayanistes had a specialized mode of locomotion. The expanded ischium is larger than that of any other archaeocete, supporting musculature for powerful retraction of the hind limbs during swimming. Posteriorly angled neural spines on lumbar vertebrae and other features indicate increased passive flexibility of the lumbus. Rayanistes probably used its enhanced lumbar flexibility to increase the length of the power stroke during pelvic paddling. Recovery of a remingtonocetid in Egypt broadens the distribution of Remingtonocetidae and shows that protocetids were not the only semiaquatic archaeocetes capable of dispersal across the southern Tethys Sea.


2018 ◽  
Vol 505 ◽  
pp. 18-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douaa Fathy ◽  
Michael Wagreich ◽  
Susanne Gier ◽  
Ramadan S.A. Mohamed ◽  
Rafat Zaki ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 305 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 93-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarit Ashckenazi-Polivoda ◽  
Sigal Abramovich ◽  
Ahuva Almogi-Labin ◽  
Aya Schneider-Mor ◽  
Shimon Feinstein ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 183 (6) ◽  
pp. 573-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Bardet

AbstractA global comparison of coeval Maastrichtian marine reptiles (squamates, plesiosaurs, chelonians and crocodyliformes) of Europe, New Jersey, northwestern Africa and Middle-East has been performed. More than twenty outcrops and fifty species (half of them being mosasaurids) have been recorded. PEA and Cluster Analysis have been performed using part of this database and have revealed that marine reptile faunas (especially the mosasaurid ones) from the Mediterranean Tethys are clearly segregated into two different palaeobiogeographical provinces: 1) The northern Tethys margin province (New Jersey and Europe), located around palaeolatitudes 30-40°N and developping into warm-temperate environments, is dominated by mosasaurid squamates and chelonioid chelonians; it is characterized by the mosasaurid association of Mosasaurus hoffmanni and Prognathodon sectorius. 2) The southern Tethys margin province (Brazil and the Arabo-African domain), located between palaeolatitudes 20°N-20°S and developping into intertropical environments, is dominated by mosasaurid squamates and bothremydid chelonians; it is characterized by the mosasaurid association of Globidens phosphaticus as well as by Halisaurus arambourgi and Platecarpus (?) ptychodon (Arabo-African domain). These faunal differences are interpreted as revealing palaeoecological preferences probably linked to differences in palaeolatitudinal gradients and/or to palaeocurrents.On a palaeoecological point on view and concerning mosasaurids, the mosasaurines (Prognathodon, Mosasaurus, Globidens and Carinodens) prevail on both margins but with different species. The ichthyophageous plioplatecarpines Plioplatecarpus (Northern margin) and Platecarpus (?) ptychodon (Southern margin) characterise respectively each margin. The halisaurine Halisaurus is present on both margins but with different species. Of importance, the tylosaurines remain currently unknown on the southern Tethys margin and are restricted to higher palaeolatitudes. Chelonians (bothremydids and chelonioids) are respective of each margin, which probably indicates lower dispersal capabilities compared to mosasaurids. The relative scarcity of plesiosaurs and crocodyliformes could be linked to different ecological preferences. The noteworthy crocodyliforme diversity increase in the Palaeogene is probably linked to mosasaurid extinction during the biological crisis of the K/Pg boundary.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document