Airway hyperresponsiveness to inhaled mannitol identifies a cluster of non-eosinophilic asthma patients with high symptom burden

Author(s):  
Asger Sverrild ◽  
Anne H. Andreasen ◽  
Christian G. Westergaard ◽  
Anna von Bülow ◽  
Pernille B. Udesen ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Laura Bergantini ◽  
Miriana d’Alessandro ◽  
Paolo Cameli ◽  
Clara Bono ◽  
Marco Perruzza ◽  
...  

Allergy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiano Caruso ◽  
Stefania Colantuono ◽  
Barbara Tolusso ◽  
Clara Di Mario ◽  
Antonella Pentassuglia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Jiang ◽  
Ruoli An ◽  
Li Cheng ◽  
Qianru Yue ◽  
Hanwei Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Investigating the endotypes of the different asthma phenotypes would help disease monitoring, prognosis determination, and improving asthma management standardization. This study aimed to classify asthma into four endotypes according to the allergic and eosinophilic characteristics and explore the phenotypes (clinical characteristics, pulmonary functions, and fractional expired nitric oxide (FeNO)) of each endotype. Methods This retrospective study included non-acute asthma patients treated at the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (05/2016–01/2018). The patients were classified into the eosinophilic allergic, eosinophilic non-allergic, non-eosinophilic allergic, and non-eosinophilic non-allergic asthma endotypes. Serum sIgE, lung function, FeNO, and induced sputum cytology were tested and compared among groups. Results Of the 171 included patients, 22 had eosinophilic allergic asthma, 17 had eosinophilic non-allergic asthma, 66 had non-eosinophilic allergic asthma, and 66 had non-eosinophilic non-allergic asthma. Lung function measurements (FEV1%, FEF25%, FEF50%, FEF75%, and FEF25–75%) showed that airway dysfunction was worse in eosinophilic non-allergic asthma than in the other three endotypes (all P < 0.001). In allergic asthma patients, eosinophilic asthma had worse airway dysfunction than non-eosinophilic asthma (all P < 0.05). Similar results were found in non-allergic asthma (all P < 0.01). The FeNO levels in eosinophilic allergic asthma were higher than in eosinophilic non-allergic and non-eosinophilic non-allergic asthma (both P = 0.001). Conclusions FeNO can objectively reflect eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma. Endotypic classification of asthma patients regarding the allergic and eosinophilic characteristics is conducive to the effective management of patients with asthma.


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged Mohammed Refaat ◽  
Dina Sayed Sheha ◽  
Riham Hazem Raaft ◽  
Maged Mohamed Refaat ◽  
Heba Eid Farhat Abo Alia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Context:- Asthma is a heterogenous disease with various phenotypes, it is the most common chronic disease characterized by airway limitation due to bronchospasm and airway inflammation associated with excessive mucus secretion from agitated mucus gland that occur due to air way hyper responiveness. Purpose of the study Comparison between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic asthma patients. Patients and Methods 100 bronchial asthma patients of age ≥ 18 years old divided into2 groups according to blood eosinophilia. All patients were subjected to: history. Total Asthma Control Test. Spirometry. Sputum eosinophil count. IgE levels 6-Skin prick testing (SPT). Nasal endoscopy. Results the mean age of all patients was (35.4 ± 12.8) years, majority (61%) of patients were males,; the mean ACT score was (18.7 ± 2); 39% of cases have obstructive pattern by spirometry, 39% of cases had abnormal nasal endoscopy, SPT had significant relation with asthma, there is significant correlation between total IGE,sputum eosinophilia with eosinophilic asthma. Conclusion Blood eosinophils had the highest accuracy in the identification of sputum eosinophilia in asthma. Total IgE values and sutum eosinophilia were markedly increased in patients with eosinophilic asthma more than patients with non-eosinophilic asthma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1902259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gráinne d'Ancona ◽  
Joanne Kavanagh ◽  
Cris Roxas ◽  
Linda Green ◽  
Mariana Fernandes ◽  
...  

IntroductionInhaled corticosteroids (ICS) achieve disease control in the majority of asthmatic patients, although adherence to prescribed ICS is often poor. Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma may require treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS) and/or biologic agents such as mepolizumab. It is unknown if ICS adherence changes on, or alters clinical response to, biologic therapy.MethodsWe examined ICS adherence and clinical outcomes in OCS-dependent severe eosinophilic asthma patients who completed 1 year of mepolizumab therapy. The ICS medicines possession ratio (MPR) was calculated (the number of doses of ICS issued on prescription/expected number) for the year before and the year after biologic initiation. Good adherence was defined as MPR >0.75, intermediate 0.74–0.51 and poor <0.5. We examined outcomes after 12 months of biologic therapy, including OCS reduction and annualised exacerbation rate (AER), stratified by adherence to ICS on mepolizumab.ResultsOut of 109 patients commencing mepolizumab, 91 who had completed 12 months of treatment were included in the final analysis. While receiving mepolizumab, 68% had good ICS adherence, with 16 (18%) having poor ICS adherence. ICS use within the cohort remained similar before (MPR 0.81±0.32) and during mepolizumab treatment (0.82±0.32; p=0.78). Patients with good adherence had greater reductions in OCS dose (median (interquartile range) OCS reduction 100 (74–100)% versus 60 (27–100)%; p=0.031) and exacerbations (AER change −2.1±3.1 versus 0.3±2.5; p=0.011) than those with poor adherence. Good ICS adherence predicted the likelihood of stopping maintenance OCS (adjusted OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.02–9.94; p=0.045).ConclusionICS nonadherence is common in severe eosinophilic asthma patients receiving mepolizumab, and is associated with a lesser reduction in OCS requirements and AER.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (01) ◽  
pp. 091-099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kian Fan Chung

AbstractSevere therapy-resistant asthma has been defined as “asthma which requires treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) plus a second controller (and/or systemic corticosteroids) to prevent it from becoming ‘uncontrolled’ or which remains ‘uncontrolled’ despite this therapy”. Patients who usually present with ‘difficult-to-treat asthma’ should first be assessed to determine whether he/she has asthma with the exclusion of other diagnoses and if so, whether the asthma can be classified as severe therapy-resistant. This necessitates an assessment of adherence to medications, confounding factors, and comorbidities. Increasingly, management of severe therapy-resistant asthma will be helped by the determination of phenotypes to optimize responses to existing and new therapies. Severe asthma patients are usually on a combination of high dose ICS and long-acting β-agonist (LABA) and, in addition, are often on a maintenance dose of oral corticosteroids. Phenotyping can be informed by measuring blood eosinophil counts and the level of nitric oxide in exhaled breath, and the use of sputum granulocytic counts. Severe allergic asthma and severe eosinophilic asthma are two defined phenotypes for which there are efficacious targeted biologic therapies currently available, namely anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) and anti-interleukin (IL)-5 antibodies, respectively. Further progress will be realized with the definition of noneosinophilic or non-T2 phenotypes. It will be important for patients with severe asthma to be ultimately investigated and managed in specialized severe asthma centers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S413
Author(s):  
F. Maunoury ◽  
C. Pribil ◽  
M. Aubier ◽  
G. Nachbaur ◽  
S. Doyle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document