scholarly journals Relative commutator calculus in Chevalley groups

2013 ◽  
Vol 385 ◽  
pp. 262-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roozbeh Hazrat ◽  
Nikolai Vavilov ◽  
Zuhong Zhang
2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 497-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolai Vavilov ◽  
Zuhong Zhang

AbstractIn the present paper, which is a direct sequel of our paper [14] joint with Roozbeh Hazrat, we prove an unrelativized version of the standard commutator formula in the setting of Chevalley groups. Namely, let Φ be a reduced irreducible root system of rank ≥ 2, let R be a commutative ring and let I,J be two ideals of R. We consider subgroups of the Chevalley group G(Φ, R) of type Φ over R. The unrelativized elementary subgroup E(Φ, I) of level I is generated (as a group) by the elementary unipotents xα(ξ), α ∈ Φ, ξ ∈ I, of level I. Obviously, in general, E(Φ, I) has no chance to be normal in E(Φ, R); its normal closure in the absolute elementary subgroup E(Φ, R) is denoted by E(Φ, R, I). The main results of [14] implied that the commutator [E(Φ, I), E(Φ, J)] is in fact normal in E(Φ, R). In the present paper we prove an unexpected result, that in fact [E(Φ, I), E(Φ, J)] = [E(Φ, R, I), E(Φ, R, J)]. It follows that the standard commutator formula also holds in the unrelativized form, namely [E(Φ, I), C(Φ, R, J)] = [E(Φ, I), E(Φ, J)], where C(Φ, R, I) is the full congruence subgroup of level I. In particular, E(Φ, I) is normal in C(Φ, R, I).


1989 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Völklein
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 945-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bomshik Chang

Following the notation and the definitions in [1], let L(K) be the Chevalley group of type L over a field K, W the Weyl group of L and h the Coxeter number, i.e., the order of Coxeter elements of W. In a letter to the author, John McKay asked the following question: If h + 1 is a prime, is there an element of order h + 1 in L(C)? In this note we give an affirmative answer to this question by constructing an element of order h + 1 (prime or otherwise) in the subgroup Lz = 〈xτ(1)|r ∈ Φ〉 of L(K), for any K.Our problem has an immediate solution when L = An. In this case h = n + 1 and the (n + l) × (n + l) matrixhas order 2(h + 1) in SLn+1(K). This seemingly trivial solution turns out to be a prototype of general solutions in the following sense.


1977 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Burgoyne ◽  
Robert Griess ◽  
Richard Lyons

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Bardestani ◽  
Camelia Karimianpour ◽  
Keivan Mallahi-Karai ◽  
Hadi Salmasian

Author(s):  
Yakov N. Nuzhin ◽  

The author has previously (Trudy IMM UrO RAN, 19(2013), no. 3) described the groups lying between twisted Chevalley groups G(K) and G(F) of type 2Al, 2Dl, 2E6, 3D4 in the case when the larger field F is an algebraic extension of the smaller nonperfect field K of exceptional characteristic for the group G(F) (characteristics 2 and 3 for the type 3D4 and only 2 for other types). It turned out that apart from, perhaps, the type 2Dl, such intermediate subgroups are standard, that is, they are exhausted by the groups G(P)H for some intermediate subfield P, K ⊆ P ⊆ F, and of the diagonal subgroup H normalizing the group G(P). In this note, it is established that intermediate subgroups are also standard for the type 2Dl


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document