Usefulness of intra-articular botulinum toxin injections. A systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hichem Khenioui ◽  
Eric Houvenagel ◽  
Jean François Catanzariti ◽  
Marc Alexandre Guyot ◽  
Olivier Agnani ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 1160-1176.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Sébastien Bourseul ◽  
Anais Molina ◽  
Mael Lintanf ◽  
Laetitia Houx ◽  
Emmanuelle Chaléat-Valayer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laure Mathevon ◽  
Arnaud Declemy ◽  
Isabelle Laffont ◽  
Dominic Perennou

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (25) ◽  
pp. 3268-3280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniëlle Roorda ◽  
Zarah AM Abeln ◽  
Jaap Oosterlaan ◽  
Lodewijk WE van Heurn ◽  
Joep PM Derikx

Toxins ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mieszko Wieckiewicz ◽  
Natalia Grychowska ◽  
Marek Zietek ◽  
Gniewko Wieckiewicz ◽  
Joanna Smardz

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Robert S. English Jr. ◽  
Sophia Ruiz

In this systematic review, we summarize the efficacy and safety of intradermal and intramuscular botulinum toxin injections for androgenic alopecia (AGA). Using PubMed, we conducted a literature search up to February 2021 using the following keyword combinations: “botulinum toxin” or “botox” and “androgenetic alopecia,” “hair loss,” or “alopecia.” Five clinical studies met our inclusion criteria: 4 prospective cohorts and 1 randomized clinical trial (RCT). Study durations ranged from 24 to 60 weeks. No studies included control groups or compared botulinum toxin injections against approved treatments. A total of 165 participants were identified – all of whom were males with AGA. Of the 4 studies measuring response rates (i.e., subjects with >0% hair changes), response rates ranged from 75 to 79.1%. Within studies measuring hair count changes from intramuscular injections, changes ranged from 18 to 20.9%. No serious adverse events were reported. Studies on botulinum toxin injections have produced favorable outcomes for AGA subjects. However, results should be interpreted with caution due to the absence of control groups, small numbers of participants, and relatively low Jadad quality scores. Large RCTs are recommended to confirm efficacy and safety, explore the effects of botulinum toxin on females with pattern hair loss, and establish best practices for intradermal and intramuscular injection methodologies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 134-134
Author(s):  
Ros Wade ◽  
Stephen Rice ◽  
Eoin Moloney ◽  
Julija Stoniute ◽  
Alison Layton ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION:Hyperhidrosis is characterized by uncontrollable excessive sweating, which occurs at rest, regardless of temperature. Symptoms can significantly affect quality of life. There is substantial variation in the secondary care treatment of hyperhidrosis and uncertainty regarding optimal patient management. The objective of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) was to review the evidence and establish the expected value of undertaking additional research into effective interventions for the management of primary hyperhidrosis in secondary care. Capturing the perspectives of patients and clinicians treating hyperhidrosis was an important part of the research.METHODS:The assessment included a systematic review and economic model, including value of information analysis. Patients, dermatologists, a vascular surgeon and a specialist nurse (who set up the UK Hyperhidrosis Support Group) provided advice at various stages, including at an end-of-project workshop, to help interpret results and prioritize research recommendations.RESULTS:Patient and clinician advisors were unsurprised by the finding that there is evidence of a large effect of botulinum toxin injections on axillary hyperhidrosis symptoms in the short to medium term; there was consensus amongst patients and clinicians that botulinum toxin injections were very effective. The advisors agreed that a trial of botulinum toxin injections (plus anesthetic) versus iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis would be useful. Patients and clinicians were happy with the sequence of treatments identified as being cost effective for axillary hyperhidrosis: iontophoresis, botulinum toxin injections, anticholinergic medication, curettage, endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy. All patients agreed that the Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life index (HidroQoL©) tool was superior to other commonly used tools for assessing quality of life in hyperhidrosis.CONCLUSIONS:Patients and clinicians considered the key findings of the systematic review and economic analyses to be appropriate. Advisors advocated a trial of botulinum toxin injections (plus anaesthetic) versus iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis. Patients preferred the HydroQoL® tool over other commonly used quality of life tools in hyperhidrosis research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Ågren ◽  
Christofer Sahin ◽  
Mattias Pettersson

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 153-154
Author(s):  
Ros Wade ◽  
Alexis Llewellyn ◽  
Julie Jones-Diette ◽  
Kath Wright ◽  
Stephen Rice ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION:Hyperhidrosis is characterized by uncontrollable excessive sweating, which occurs at rest, regardless of temperature, and can significantly affect quality of life. There is substantial variation in the availability of treatments in secondary care and uncertainty regarding optimal patient management. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the clinical effectiveness of treatments prescribed by dermatologists (iontophoresis, anticholinergic medications, botulinum toxin injections) and minor surgical treatments (curettage and newer energy based technologies) for primary hyperhidrosis and identify areas for further research.METHODS:Fifteen databases and trial registers were searched to July 2016. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted for comparisons between botulinum toxin injections and placebo for axillary hyperhidrosis. For other treatments data were synthesised narratively due to limited and heterogeneous data.RESULTS:Fifty studies were included in the review; thirty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), seventeen non-RCTs and one case series. There was substantial variation between the studies in terms of country of origin (indicating climate and population differences), interventions and methods of outcome assessment. Most studies were small, at high risk of bias and poorly reported. There was moderate quality evidence of a large statistically significant effect of botulinum toxin injections on axillary hyperhidrosis symptoms in the short to medium term (up to 16 weeks), compared with placebo. There was weak but consistent evidence for iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis. Evidence for other interventions was low or very low quality. Combining the evidence and patient advisor input, we established that further research on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections (with anesthesia) versus iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis would be useful.CONCLUSIONS:The evidence for the effectiveness and safety of treatments for primary hyperhidrosis is limited overall and few firm conclusions can be drawn. However, there is moderate quality evidence to support the use of botulinum toxin injections for axillary hyperhidrosis. A trial comparing botulinum toxin injections with iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis is warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document