Eye protection following cataract surgery: a systematic review

Author(s):  
Arjan S. Dhoot ◽  
Marko M. Popovic ◽  
Soomin Lee ◽  
Sherif El-Defrawy ◽  
Matthew B. Schlenker
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Chu ◽  
Elie Akl ◽  
Amena El-Harakeh ◽  
Antonio Bognanni ◽  
Tamara Lotf ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuying Shi ◽  
Jinqiu Yuan ◽  
Benny Zee

Background. Phacoemulsification under local anesthesia is regarded as the major surgery for cataract treatment. Recent research has compared the pain perception between the first eye and the second eye during phacoemulsification. However, these studies have also yielded controversial findings. Consequently, we performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to investigate the difference in the pain perception between the first and second eyes during phacoemulsification. Method. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for the studies published up to October 5, 2018. Prospective observational studies were included. The meta-analysis was conducted by means of random-effects model and fixed-effects model according to the heterogeneity. Evaluation of the methodological quality of studies was based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results. Overall, eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis of pooled data showed that the pain scores of the first eye shortly after surgery under local anesthesia were significantly lower as compared to the second eye (WMD: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.98; P<0.00001). The average pain scores of the first eye shortly after surgery under the topical anesthesia were also lower than those of the second eye (WMD: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.36; P<0.00001). Conversely, anxiety scores in the first eye surgery were significantly higher than those in the second eye surgery (SMD: −0.40; 95% CI: −0.64, −0.16; P=0.001). However, the difference of the pain scores accessed on the first postoperative day between the first and second eye surgeries (WMD: −0.05; 95% CI −0.40, 0.31; P=0.79) as well as cooperation grades of patients between the first and second eye surgeries (WMD: 0.35; 95% CI −0.07, 0.76; P=0.10) was not statistically significant. Conclusion. Patients experienced more pain in the surgery of the second eye than that of the first eye, which probably related to lower anxiety before the second surgery. It suggests that we should consider preoperative intervention to reduce the perceived pain during second eye cataract surgery.


The Lancet ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 395 (10242) ◽  
pp. 1973-1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek K Chu ◽  
Elie A Akl ◽  
Stephanie Duda ◽  
Karla Solo ◽  
Sally Yaacoub ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 531-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Charlesworth ◽  
Alison J Alderson ◽  
Victoria Juan ◽  
David B Elliott

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. e0235699
Author(s):  
Eunice Wandia Mailu ◽  
Bhavisha Virendrakumar ◽  
Stevens Bechange ◽  
Emma Jolley ◽  
Elena Schmidt

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000488
Author(s):  
Taha Muneer Ahmed ◽  
Badrul Hussain ◽  
M A Rehman Siddiqui

ObjectiveThe purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review of existing literature on simulation-based training of cataract surgery. Available literature was evaluated and projections on how current findings could be applied to cataract surgery training were summarised. The quality of included literature was also assessed.Methods and analysisThe PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles pertaining to simulation training in cataract surgery on 18 November 2019. Selected articles were qualitatively analysed.ResultsA total of 165 articles were identified out of which 10 met inclusion criteria. Four studies reported construct validity of the EyeSi simulator. Six studies demonstrated improved surgical outcomes corresponding to training on the simulator. Quality assessment of included studies was satisfactory.ConclusionCurrent studies on simulation training in cataract surgery all point towards it being an effective training tool with low risk of study biases confounding this conclusion. As technology improves, surgical training must embrace and incorporate simulation technology in training.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document