Processes for Identifying and Reviewing Adverse Events and Near Misses at an Academic Medical Center

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Martinez ◽  
Lisa Soleymani Lehmann ◽  
Yue-Yung Hu ◽  
Sonali Parekh Desai ◽  
Jo Shapiro
CHEST Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (4) ◽  
pp. A1605
Author(s):  
Brandon Walsh ◽  
Maria Sunseri ◽  
Amit Uppal ◽  
Vikramjit Mukherjee

Author(s):  
Alexandre R. Marra ◽  
Abdullah Algwizani ◽  
Mohammed Alzunitan ◽  
Theresa M. H. Brennan ◽  
Michael B. Edmond

Background: Adverse safety events in healthcare are of great concern, and despite an increasing focus on the prevention of error and harm mitigation, the epidemiology of safety events remains incomplete. Methods: We performed an analysis of all reported safety events in an academic medical center using a voluntary incident reporting surveillance system for patient safety. Safety events were classified as: serious (reached the patient and resulted in moderate to severe harm or death); precursor (reached the patient and resulted in minimal or no detectable harm); and near miss (did not reach the patient). Results: During a three-year period, there were 31,817 events reported. Most of the safety events were precursor safety events (reached the patient and resulted in minimal harm or no detectable harm), corresponding to 77.3%. Near misses accounted for 10.8%, and unsafe conditions for 11.8%. The number of reported serious safety events was low, accounting for only 0.1% of all safety events. Conclusions: The reports analysis of these events should lead to a better understanding of risks in patient care and ways to mitigate it.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 528-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirisha Kundrapu ◽  
Sireesha Datla ◽  
Vanessa Griffin ◽  
Robert W. Maitta

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (07) ◽  
pp. 788-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise M. Martin ◽  
Brandy Bryant ◽  
Tristan R. Grogan ◽  
Zachary A. Rubin ◽  
Dana L. Russell ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the impact of discontinuing routine contact precautions (CP) for endemic methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus(VRE) on hospital adverse events.DESIGNRetrospective, nonrandomized, observational, quasi-experimental study.SETTINGAcademic medical center with single-occupancy rooms.PARTICIPANTSInpatients.METHODSWe compared hospital reportable adverse events 1 year before and 1 year after discontinuation of routine CP for endemic MRSA and VRE (preintervention and postintervention periods, respectively). Throughout the preintervention period, daily chlorhexidine gluconate bathing was expanded to nearly all inpatients. Chart reviews were performed to identify which patients and events were associated with CP for MRSA/VRE in the preintervention period as well as the patients that would have met prior criteria for MRSA/VRE CP but were not isolated in the postintervention period. Adverse events during the 2 periods were compared using segmented and mixed-effects Poisson regression models.RESULTSThere were 24,732 admissions in the preintervention period and 25,536 in the postintervention period. Noninfectious adverse events (ie, postoperative respiratory failure, hemorrhage/hematoma, thrombosis, wound dehiscence, pressure ulcers, and falls or trauma) decreased by 19% (12.3 to 10.0 per 1,000 admissions,P=.022) from the preintervention to the postintervention period. There was no significant difference in the rate of infectious adverse events after CP discontinuation (20.7 to 19.4 per 1,000 admissions,P=.33). Patients with MRSA/VRE showed the largest reduction in noninfectious adverse events after CP discontinuation, with a 72% reduction (21.4 to 6.08 per 1,000 MRSA/VRE admissions;P<.001).CONCLUSIONAfter discontinuing routine CP for endemic MRSA/VRE, the rate of noninfectious adverse events declined, especially in patients who no longer required isolation. This suggests that elimination of CP may substantially reduce noninfectious adverse events.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2018;788–796


2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odette Y. Comeau ◽  
Josette Armendariz-Batiste ◽  
Scott A. Woodby

Background Adult critical care patients in an academic medical center experienced adverse events during intrafacility transport resulting from lack of preparation. An intervention was needed to help keep patients safe during intrafacility transport. Objective To develop a checklist for transport that is easy to use and effective in preparing patients for transport. Method A checklist was developed and implemented. Elements of the checklist include preparation of the patient before transport, screening of patients for criteria that may place them at higher risk during transport, and a checklist for the procedural site. Results From May 2011 through July 2014, 2506 transports were conducted. Of these, 97.6% (n = 2445) involved no reported complications. Conclusion This tool is suitable for bedside clinicians to use when preparing patients for transport.


2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
JoAnn Manson ◽  
Beverly Rockhill ◽  
Margery Resnick ◽  
Eleanor Shore ◽  
Carol Nadelson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document