Constructing and selecting optimal sustainable sanitation system based on expanded structured decision-making for global sanitation and resources crisis

2021 ◽  
pp. 128598
Author(s):  
Ming Hu ◽  
Jinyu Xiao ◽  
Bin Fan ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Shikun Zhu
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1079-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Martin ◽  
Michael C. Runge ◽  
James D. Nichols ◽  
Bruce C. Lubow ◽  
William L. Kendall

1995 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-45
Author(s):  
Granger Macy ◽  
Joan C. Neal

This study examined the effectiveness of conflict-generating decision-making techniques in the college classroom. Utiliz ing constructive conflict in classroom exercises may affect decision-making quality and student reactions. This study of undergraduate and graduate business students found significant difference in both the quality of the decisions and in student reactions to the techniques. The findings and discussion indicate the potential for appropriate use of structured decision-making techniques in the classroom.


2020 ◽  
pp. 39-52
Author(s):  
Anđelka Štilić

Multicriteria problems belong to poorly structured decision-making problems as they take place in conditions of stochasticity (indeterminacy). This primarily refers to the number of criteria and the complexity of their mutual relations between which there may be complete opposition, as well as to the methodologically diverse space for determining preferences or weighting factors which significantly affect the decision-making results. The paper focuses on the introduction of new types of criteria: 1 - 4 interval type criteria and its implementation in EDAS + method of multicriteria analysis.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina K Himes Boor ◽  
Paul Wade

The conservation and management of wild populations and ecosystems almost always involves making decisions in the face of uncertainty and risk. The application of science to the ecological decision-making process was something that the late Professor Daniel Goodman thought deeply about. In this paper we outline the three main principles that Dr. Goodman espoused for good practice when conducting analyses for ecological decision-making: 1) the results should be conditioned on all relevant data and information, 2) there must be a full characterization of all uncertainty, and it should be fully propagated into the result, and 3) doing so in the correct way will result in the calculation of an accurate probability distribution (conditioned on our understanding of the state of nature) that should be used directly for ecological decision-making. Dr. Goodman believed that in the context of threatened and endangered species management Population Viability Analysis (PVA), Bayesian statistics, and structured decision-making are the most logical tools to achieve the three principles. To illustrate the application of the principles and tools in a real management setting, we discuss a Bayesian PVA that Dr. Goodman produced for the endangered Steller sea lion. We conclude by discussing the practical and philosophical impediments that may limit the full realization of the three principles and we offer some suggested solutions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Carin Gammage ◽  
Astrid Jarre

The Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAF) management, recognising complexity, aims for the holistic, sustainable management of fisheries to promote healthy marine ecosystems and sustainable livelihoods. Effective implementation of the EAF has been problematic as we continue to grapple with issues of scale, knowledge integration and meaningful stakeholder engagement. Scenario-planning approaches in marine social ecological systems (SES) can address some of these challenges. Using systems-thinking, scenario-planning presents the opportunity to address challenges simultaneously at different scales of interaction by addressing the needs at smaller and larger decision-making scales. We here present a prototype scenario-based approach in which we used structured decision-making tools (SDMTs) in an iterative and interactive research process with marginalised stakeholders in a small-scale fishery in South Africa’s southern Cape. Using this approach presented an opportunity for fishers to consider pathways for future responses to change while enhancing personal and local adaptive capacity. At the same time, these marginalised fishers were provided with an important opportunity to freely air their views while engaging with tools new to them. The process did not only benefit fishers, but also provided valuable insights into how they view and experience their marine SES. The use of these tools has provided a means to integrate different knowledge streams, identifying ways in which challenges presented by scale in SES is better addressed. As a next step in the prototype development, expansion to more diverse stakeholders in the biogeographical region relevant for this fishery is recommended. We highlight how this approach can contribute to multi-level governance. When considering EAF implementation, we highlight how engaging marginalised stakeholders need not mean losing the reproducible, transparent processes required for modern management. Lastly, we discuss how multi-scalar flow of information could improve the implementation of an EAF in a developing society, such as that of South Africa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document