scholarly journals Definitive fixation of open tibia fractures: Does reopening the traumatic wound increase complication rates?

Author(s):  
Alan W. Reynolds ◽  
Mariano Garay ◽  
Frances Hite Philp ◽  
Jon Hammarstedt ◽  
Gregory T. Altman ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Jan Bleeker ◽  
Inge H.F. Reininga ◽  
Bryan J.M. van de Wall ◽  
Laurent A.M. Hendrickx ◽  
Frank J.P. Beeres ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yashavantha Kumar C. ◽  
Shivaprasad M. S. ◽  
Trilok V.

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Distal tibia shaft fractures pose significant challenge to treating surgeons. Giving more importance to anatomical reduction and ignoring often injured soft tissues has led to poor outcomes and high complication rates. Although multiple options are described to treat these fractures, there is no consensus on the best method of treatment. We hereby want to study the results of distal tibia fractures treated by expert tibia nailing and distal tibia plating.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This study was undertaken in patients who were operated in between January 2012 to March 2015 at M S Ramaiah Teaching Hospital, which is a tertiary care hospital in Bangalore. Study included 52 patients with distal tibia fracture treated by surgery. All the fractures were closed distal diaphyseal fractures without articular involvement. Thirty two patients underwent expert tibia nailing whereas 20 patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with locking plates. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Fifty two patients included in study and they were divided into two groups as nailing group and plating group. Plating group included 20 patients whereas nailing group included 32 patients. The mode of injury was  road traffic injury in 32 cases , followed by self-fall in 17 cases and sports related injury in 3 cases. Distal tibia fracture was associated with in 29 patients (87%) of nailing group whereas in 17 patients (80) of plating group. Average distance of fracture from pilon was 6 cm in nailing group and 3cm in plating group.  The average duration of surgery in nailing was  group  was 88 minutes (range, 65-130 minutes) whereas average duration of surgery in  plating group was group  was 92 minutes (range, 70-130 minutes).  The average time for union was 16 weeks for nailing group and for plating group it was 18 weeks.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Both intramedullary nailing and plating are the optimal methods of treatment. Plating is preferred in cases where fracture is close to pilon whereas intramedullary nailing is preferred for fractures away from tibial pilon. There is no significant difference between union and complication rates.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 554-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin M. Haller ◽  
Michael Githens ◽  
John Scolaro ◽  
Reza Firoozabadi

Author(s):  
Antonio Klasan ◽  
Sven Edward Putnis ◽  
Wai Weng Yeo ◽  
Darli Myat ◽  
Brett Andrew Fritsch ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite multiple studies, there remains a debate on the safety of bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) in the average age patient, with a paucity of data on the outcome of BTKA in an elderly population. This study included 89 patients aged 80 years and older undergoing sequential BTKA over 14 years were identified in a prospectively collected database. Two matched comparison groups were created: patients under 80 undergoing sequential BTKA and patients over 80 undergoing unilateral TKA (UTKA). An analysis of complications, mortality, revision, and patient-reported outcome measures was performed. Mean age of the elderly cohorts was similar: 82.6 for BTKA and 82.9 for UTKA. The average age BTKA cohort had a mean age of 69.1. Complication rates were higher in bilateral cohorts, more so in the elderly BTKA cohort. Pulmonary embolism (PE) was observed in bilateral cohorts only. In these patients, history of PE and ischemic heart disease was a strong predictive factor for developing a major complication. There was no difference in revision rates and infection rates between the three cohorts, and no difference in patient survivorship between the two elderly cohorts. Through the combination of low revision and high survivorship rates and comparable clinical outcomes, this article demonstrates that simultaneous BTKA is an appropriate option to consider for an elderly patient, with proper patient selection and perioperative management. The demonstrated risk groups show that emphasis on patient selection should be focused on medical history rather than chronological age.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document