Background: There is a lack of reliable information on outcomes following cleft surgery. Options for timing and choice of primary cleft surgery had not been compared in randomised trials.
Methods: Non-syndromic infants, aged six months, with isolated cleft of the secondary palate without associated lip deformity, were included in this prospective randomised controlled trial to one of four options: Veau-Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty at six (VWK06) or 12 months of age (VWK12), or two-flap palatoplasty with intra-velar veloplasty at six (2F-IVV06) or 12 months of age (2F-IVV12).
Results: Of the 76 infants included in the trial, 90.8 per cent received surgery: VWK06 (n=18), VWK12 (n=16), 2F-IVV06 (n=18) and 2F-IVV12 (n=17). Early postoperative complications occurred in two VWK infants (6.1%) and three 2F-IVV infants (8.8%). With surgery planned at six (T06) and 12 months of age (T12) respectively, there were three VWK infants (8.6%) and two 2F-IVV infants (6.3%). At age three, speech assessments were conducted for 62 (84%) children. Velopharyngeal inadequacy symptoms were detected in 4/30 VWK children (13.3%) and 3/30 2F-IVV children (10.0%). With T06 and T12, there were three VWK infants (9.4%) and four 2F-IVV infants (14.3%). Otitis media was documented in 40/61 of children (65.6%) hyper- and/or hyponasality in 27/61 of children (44%) and articulation errors in 53/60 of children (88%).
Conclusion: Postsurgical complication rates differ little between VWK and 2F-IVV. At three years, there were no demonstrable differences in velopharyngeal inadequacy symptoms, nasality, articulation and otitis media between the two surgical techniques at two different times.