Using the Psychopathic Personality Inventory to identify subtypes of antisocial personality disorder

What are individuals with psychopathy like and what are their defining features? ‘How can we know if someone is a psychopath or is at risk of becoming one?’ considers two case studies to give an idea of the developmental course of criminal psychopathy and what psychopathic personality traits look like. It discusses the Psychopathy Checklist, developed by Robert Hare in the 1980s, and explains the difference between antisocial personality disorder, sociopathy, and psychopathy. Research has shown that whether we look at criminal psychopaths, individuals with high levels of psychopathic traits in the general population, or children who are at risk of developing psychopathy, similar patterns of brain function and information processing are seen.

Download Full-text

On Moral Judgements and Personality Disorders

The British Journal of Psychiatry ◽

10.1192/bjp.153.4.505 ◽

1988 ◽

Vol 153 (4) ◽

pp. 505-512 ◽

Cited By ~ 126

Author(s):

Ronald Blackburn

Keyword(s):

Personality Disorder ◽

Antisocial Personality Disorder ◽

American Psychiatric Association ◽

Antisocial Behaviour ◽

World Health ◽

Psychopathic Personality ◽

Antisocial Personality ◽

Specific Category ◽

Health Organization ◽

Psychopathic Disorder

Psychopathic personality has always been a contentious concept, but it continues to be used in clinical practice and research. It also has its contemporary synonyms in the categories of antisocial personality disorder in DSM–III (American Psychiatric Association, 1980) and “personality disorder with predominantly asocial or sociopathic manifestations” in ICD–9 (World Health Organization, 1978), and some overlap between these and the legal category of psychopathic disorder identified in the English Mental Health Act 1983 is commonly assumed. Although the literal meaning of ‘psychopathic’ is nothing more specific than psychologically damaged, the term has long since been transmogrified to mean socially damaging, and as currently used, it implies a specific category of people inherently committed to antisocial behaviour as a consequence of personal abnormalities or deficiencies.

Download Full-text

The Differentiation of Narrative Styles in Individuals with High Psychopathic Deviate

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research ◽

10.1007/s10936-021-09824-w ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Barbara Gawda

Keyword(s):

Personality Disorder ◽

Personality Traits ◽

Antisocial Personality Disorder ◽

Computer Software ◽

Roc Curves ◽

Psychopathic Personality ◽

Antisocial Personality ◽

Clustering Method ◽

Intelligence Level ◽

Psychopathic Deviate

AbstractThe current study was designed to show the differentiation of narrative styles in individuals with high scores in Psychopathic deviate (Pd) scale and develop a method enabling identification of psychopathic personality traits based on linguistic indicators. 600 spontaneous narrations related to emotional topics have been examined for grammar, syntactic, and lexical indicators. The indicators have been selected based on a review related to language of psychopaths. The narrations were written by 200 persons who were also tested for psychopathic deviate and intelligence level, including prisoners diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder. Independent judges identified the linguistic indicators which were then counted for each person with the use of computer software. The configuration profiles of the linguistic indicators/narrative styles were established using k-mean clustering method. Then, ANOVA was performed to show which clusters differentiate the levels of psychopathic deviate. The findings show there are two configurations of language features (important: single features were not examined) associated with high levels of psychopathic deviate patterns. Two narrative styles were identified, labelled demonstrative-digressive-egocentric-emotional-dogmatic and reserved-focused on the topic-repetitive, which indicate high psychopathic deviate traits. The ROC curves were applied to establish the prediction of the narrative styles for high psychopathic deviate scores.

Download Full-text

Psychopathic traits in adolescence: a review

Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) ◽

10.1590/0103-166x2014000200009 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 31 (2) ◽

pp. 237-246 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ramiro Ronchetti ◽

Gabriel José Chittó Gauer ◽

Sílvio Vasconcellos ◽

Leonardo Machado da Silva ◽

Guinter Luhring ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Personality Disorder ◽

Antisocial Personality Disorder ◽

Personality Assessment ◽

Mental Healthcare ◽

Psychopathic Traits ◽

Psychopathic Personality ◽

Antisocial Personality ◽

History Of ◽

Initial Tendency ◽

Psychological Instruments

Currently, and throughout the history of mental healthcare, the literature highlights that there is no agreement on the use of the terms "antisocial personality disorder" and "psychopathic personality". This paper aims to promote a debate over these concepts and their evaluation for both adults and adolescents. With this aim, a systematic review was conducted in the MedLine data base between 1968 and March 2011 using the terms "adolescent", "antisocial personality disorder", and "personality assessment". From the 59 identified articles 29 were selected to further analysis. The discussion of these terms was confirmed, as well as the importance of assessing psychopathic traits during adolescence. An initial tendency to disregard the term psychopathy and its affective implications was evidenced. However, the latest psychological instruments return to the discussion regarding the use of this diagnosis and its implications.

Download Full-text

Diagnostik psychopathischer Persönlichkeitszüge bei Straftätern

Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie ◽

10.1026/1616-3443/a000286 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 44 (1) ◽

pp. 45-53 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hedwig Eisenbarth ◽

Georg W. Alpers

Keyword(s):

Personality Inventory ◽

Psychopathic Personality ◽

Psychopathic Personality Inventory

Das Psychopathic Personality Inventory Revised (PPI-R) wurde bisher anhand der Daten gesunder, nicht straffälliger Probanden validiert. Die vorliegende Untersuchung überprüft die Validität des PPI-R für Straftäterstichproben. Die PPI-R Werte von 152 männlichen Patienten des Maßregelvollzugs, 65 Strafgefangenen und 214 männlichen Studenten wurden verglichen. Es wurden Reliabilitätskoeffizienten sowie Korrelationen mit der PCL-R berechnet. Es ergaben sich gute Reliabilitätskoeffizienten in der forensischen und der Strafgefangenen-Stichprobe. Die forensischen Patienten unterschieden sich signifikant von der gesunden Gruppe im Gesamtwert des PPI-R. Der PPI-R Gesamtwert und die PCL-R sowie deren Faktoren korrelierten signifikant. Obwohl die Gütekriterien des PPI-R auch in Straftätergruppen repliziert werden konnten, legen die Ergebnisse die Verwendung spezifischer Referenzwerte nahe. Einschränkungen des Einsatzes im Rahmen von prognostischen Aussagen sind zu beachten.

Download Full-text