Patient-centered outcomes of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation for low back pain: A systematic review

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 670-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.M. Goertz ◽  
K.A. Pohlman ◽  
R.D. Vining ◽  
J.W. Brantingham ◽  
C.R. Long
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
High Velocity ◽  
Spinal Manipulation ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Low Amplitude

Patient characteristics associated with improvement of subacute and chronic low back pain treated with high velocity low amplitude (HVLA) or low velocity variable amplitude (LVVA) spinal manipulation

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
William C. Meeker ◽  
Cynthia R. Long ◽  
Maria A. Hondras ◽  
Edward F. Owens ◽  
M. Ram Gudavalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
High Velocity ◽  
Spinal Manipulation ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Variable Amplitude ◽  
Low Amplitude

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF HIGH-VELOCITY LOW-AMPLITUDE SPINAL MANIPULATION FOR NON SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-14
Author(s):  
Sadaf Shafqat
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
High Velocity ◽  
Spinal Manipulation ◽  
Spinal Manipulative Therapy ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Manipulation Under Anesthesia ◽  
Manipulative Therapy ◽  
Low Amplitude

BACKGROUND Back pain is one of the most frequently seen health problems, affecting 9 out of 10 people in a population at some point during their lives. The lower back is the region most commonly affected. Low-back pain can be debilitating, and it is often challenging to treat Low Back Pain. OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of High-Velocity Low-Amplitude (HVLA) Spinal Manipulative Therapy (SMT) for Non Specific Low Back Pain (NSLBP). STUDY DESIGN Systemic review METHODS Only articles that had adult (18 years and above) participants were included in this review and studies that classified the intervention as HVLA spinal manipulation were included. Studies that included spinal manipulation other than HVLA or studies of spinal manipulation under anesthesia were excluded. RESULTS Eight full text papers and three systemic reviews justifying the inclusion criteria are reviewed which revealed that high velocity low amplitude spinal manipulative therapy have significant effect in alleviating low back pain. CONCLUSION Spinal manipulation therapy is a distinctive approach that considerably decreases nonspecific low back pain however there is need of further clinical trials into this subject focusing solely on high velocity low amplitude spinal manipulation.

scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS OF LUMBAR MANIPULATION (HIGH VELOCITY LOW AMPLITUDE) FOR THE TREATMENT OF LOW BACK PAIN IN COMPARISON TO BACK STRETCHING EXERCISES

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Syed Abid Mehdi Kazmi ◽  
Nabiha Mujahid Faruq ◽  
Sumaira Imran Farooqui ◽  
Jharna Devi
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
High Velocity ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Before And After ◽  
History Of ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Low Amplitude ◽  
Stretching Exercises

OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of lumbar manipulation (high velocity low amplitude) for the treatment of low back pain in comparison to back stretching exercises. Randomized Control Trial (Experimental Study) The study was conducted on 200 patients at the Physiotherapy Department of Ziauddin Hospital among patients with history of low back pain of acute, sub acute or chronic origin. In this study, patients were divided into two groups, group A and group B equally. Group A of 100 patients received Lumbar Manipulation (High Velocity Low Amplitude) and at the same time Group B of 100 patients were treated by back stretching exercises. A pre tested and structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Data was entered and analyzed by using SPSS. Pain was measured on Visual Analogue Scale before and after the given treatment. The study showed significant results for both the interventions in the treatment of low back pain but Lumbar Manipulation has been more effective in different types of low back pain while stretching exercises are less effective. On the basis of this study, we are very confident that lumbar manipulation is more effective for the treatment of low back pain compared to back stretching

Postisometric Relaxation Versus High Velocity Low Amplitude Techniques in Low Back Pain

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-108
Author(s):  
A. Aleksiev ◽  
T. Kraev
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
High Velocity ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Low Amplitude

scholarly journals Comparison between high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation and muscle energy technique on pain and trunk neuromuscular postural control in male workers with chronic low back pain: A randomised crossover trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro A. Sturiona ◽  
Alexandre H. Nowotny ◽  
Fabrice Barillecb ◽  
Gilles Barette ◽  
Gabriela K. Santosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
High Velocity ◽  
Postural Balance ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Neuromuscular Activation ◽  
Muscle Energy ◽  
Low Amplitude ◽  
Male Workers

Background: A therapeutic recommendation for restoring function in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) is manual therapy through manipulative spinal or muscle energy techniques.Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of two osteopathic manipulative techniques on clinical low back symptoms and trunk neuromuscular postural control in male workers with CLBP.Method: Ten male workers with CLBP were randomly allocated to two groups: high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation or muscle energy techniques (MET). Each group received one therapy per week for both techniques during 7 weeks of treatment. Pain and function were measured by using the Numeric Pain-Rating Scale, the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. The lumbar flexibility was assessed by Modified Schober Test. Electromyography (EMG) and force platform measurements were used for evaluation of trunk muscular activation and postural balance, respectively at three different times: baseline, post intervention, and 15 days later.Results: Both techniques were effective (p 0.01) in reducing pain with large clinical differences (-1.8 to -2.8) across immediate and after 15 days. However, no significant effect between groups and times was found for other variables, namely neuromuscular activation and postural balance measures.Conclusion: Both techniques (HVLA thrust manipulation and MET) were effective in reducing back pain immediately and 15 days later. Neither technique changed the trunk neuromuscular activation patterns nor postural balance in male workers with LBP.Clinical implications: These results may facilitate clinical decision-making for CLBP management in physiotherapy programs.

scholarly journals Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert Bronfort ◽  
Mitchell Haas ◽  
Roni L. Evans ◽  
Lex M. Bouter
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Spinal Manipulation ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Best Evidence Synthesis

Spinal Manipulation and Mobilisation for Low Back Pain: A systematic review of randomised clinical trials

Physiotherapy ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (7) ◽  
pp. 412 ◽  
Author(s):  
BW Koes ◽  
WJJ Assendelft ◽  
GJMG van der Heijden ◽  
LM Bouter
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Spinal Manipulation ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trials ◽  
Low Back

Efficacy of high-velocity low-amplitude manipulative technique in subjects with low-back pain during menstrual cramping

1993 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 203 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Boesler ◽  
Michael Warner ◽  
Adam Alpers ◽  
Edward Patrick Finnerty ◽  
Mearl A. Kilmore
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
High Velocity ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Low Amplitude

scholarly journals Spinal Manipulation Vs Sham Manipulation for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay K. Ruddock ◽  
Hannah Sallis ◽  
Andy Ness ◽  
Rachel E. Perry
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Spinal Manipulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Back
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document