scholarly journals Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert Bronfort ◽  
Mitchell Haas ◽  
Roni L. Evans ◽  
Lex M. Bouter
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Spinal Manipulation ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Best Evidence Synthesis

scholarly journals Postsurgical rehabilitation for adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy who were treated surgically: protocol for a mixed studies systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e036817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Cancelliere ◽  
Jessica J. Wong ◽  
Hainan Yu ◽  
Margareta Nordin ◽  
Silvano Mior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Qualitative Studies ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Sequential Approach

IntroductionSurgical rates for low back pain (LBP) have been increasing in Europe, North America and Asia. Many patients treated surgically will require postsurgical rehabilitation. Little is known about the effectiveness of postsurgical rehabilitation interventions on health outcomes or about patients’ experiences with these interventions.ObjectivesTo conduct a mixed studies systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies regarding: (1) the effectiveness and safety of postsurgical rehabilitation interventions for adults with LBP treated surgically and (2) the experiences of patients, healthcare providers, caregivers or others involved with the rehabilitation.Methods and analysisWe will search MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, the Index to Chiropractic Literature, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials and the Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Source for peer-reviewed empirical studies published from inception in any language. Studies using quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies will be included. We will also search reference lists of all eligible articles. Data extraction will include type of presurgical pathology, indication for surgery, surgical procedure, how the intervention was delivered and by whom, context and setting. We will conduct a quality assessment of each study and consider study quality in our evidence synthesis. We will use a sequential approach at the review level to synthesise and integrate data. First, we will synthesise the quantitative and qualitative studies independently, conducting a meta-analysis of the quantitative studies if appropriate and thematic synthesis of the qualitative studies. Then, we will integrate the quantitative and qualitative evidence by juxtaposing the findings in a matrix.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this knowledge synthesis. Findings will be disseminated through knowledge translation activities including: (1) presentations at national and international conferences and scientific meetings; (2) presentations to local and international stakeholders; (3) publications in peer-reviewed journals and (4) posts on organisational websites.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019134607.

scholarly journals Traditional Chinese Medicine for Neck Pain and Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e0117146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi-ling Yuan ◽  
Tuan-mao Guo ◽  
Liang Liu ◽  
Fu Sun ◽  
Yin-gang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Back

scholarly journals The effectiveness of physical and organisational ergonomic interventions on low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T Driessen ◽  
K. I Proper ◽  
M. W van Tulder ◽  
J. R Anema ◽  
P. M Bongers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Ergonomic Interventions

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: a systematic and critical review

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. Nolet ◽  
Hainan Yu ◽  
Pierre Côté ◽  
Anne-Laure Meyer ◽  
Vicki L. Kristman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Internal Validity ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Best Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Manual Palpation ◽  
Validity Studies

Abstract Background Static or motion manual palpation of the low back is commonly used to assess pain location and reproduction in low back pain (LBP) patients. The purpose of this study is to review the reliability and validity of manual palpation used for the assessment of LBP in adults. Method We systematically searched five databases from 2000 to 2019. We critically appraised internal validity of studies using QAREL and QUADAS-2 instruments. We stratified results using best-evidence synthesis. Validity studies were classified according to Sackett and Haynes. Results We identified 2023 eligible articles, of which 14 were low risk of bias. Evidence suggests that reliability of soft tissue structures palpation is inconsistent, and reliability of bony structures and joint mobility palpation is poor. We found preliminary evidence that gluteal muscle palpation for tenderness may be valid in differentiating LBP patients with and without radiculopathy. Conclusion Reliability of manual palpation tests in the assessment of LBP patients varies greatly. This is problematic because these tests are commonly used by manual therapists and clinicians. Little is known about the validity of these tests; therefore, their clinical utility is uncertain. High quality validity studies are needed to inform the clinical use of manual palpation tests.

scholarly journals Spinal Manipulation Vs Sham Manipulation for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay K. Ruddock ◽  
Hannah Sallis ◽  
Andy Ness ◽  
Rachel E. Perry
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Spinal Manipulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Back

scholarly journals Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? a systematic review

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0249220
Author(s):  
Valter Devecchi ◽  
Alison B. Rushton ◽  
Alessio Gallina ◽  
Nicola R. Heneghan ◽  
Deborah Falla
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Spinal Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Spine Kinematics ◽  
Neuromuscular Adaptations ◽  
Recurrent Low Back Pain

A plethora of evidence supports the existence of neuromuscular changes in people with chronic spinal pain (neck and low back pain), yet it is unclear whether neuromuscular adaptations persist for people with recurrent spinal pain when in a period of remission. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the evidence on neuromuscular adaptations in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission. Electronic databases, grey literature, and key journals were searched from inception up to the 4th of September 2020. Eligibility criteria included observational studies investigating muscle activity, spine kinematics, muscle properties, sensorimotor control, and neuromuscular performance in adults (≥ 18 years) with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data synthesis was conducted per outcome domain. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed where possible. The overall strength of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines (GRADE). From 8292 records, 27 and five studies were included in a qualitative and quantitative synthesis, respectively. Very low level of evidence supports muscle activity changes in people with recurrent low back pain, especially greater co-contraction, redistribution of muscle activity, and delayed postural control of deeper trunk muscles. Reduced range of motion of the lumbar spine was also found. Meaningful conclusions regarding other outcome domains or people with recurrent neck pain could not be drawn. In conclusion, people with recurrent low back pain during a period of remission show muscle activity and spine kinematics adaptations. Future research should investigate the long-term impact of these changes, as well as adaptations in people with recurrent neck pain.

scholarly journals Distribution and prevalence of musculoskeletal pain co-occurring with persistent low back pain: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie K. Øverås ◽  
Melker S. Johansson ◽  
Tarcisio F. de Campos ◽  
Manuela L. Ferreira ◽  
Bård Natvig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Synthesis Methods ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Body Regions

Abstract Background Co-occurring musculoskeletal pain is common among people with persistent low back pain (LBP) and associated with more negative consequences than LBP alone. The distribution and prevalence of musculoskeletal pain co-occurring with persistent LBP has not been systematically described, which hence was the aim of this review. Methods Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus. We considered observational studies from clinical settings or based on cohorts of the general or working populations involving adults 18 years or older with persistent LBP (≥4 wks) and co-occurring musculoskeletal pain for eligibility. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were carried out by independent reviewers. Results are presented according to study population, distribution and location(s) of co-occurring pain. Results Nineteen studies out of 5744 unique records met the inclusion criteria. Studies were from high-income countries in Europe, USA and Japan. A total of 34,492 people with persistent LBP were included in our evidence synthesis. Methods for assessing and categorizing co-occurring pain varied considerably between studies, but based on the available data from observational studies, we identified three main categories of co-occurring pain – these were axial pain (18 to 58%), extremity pain (6 to 50%), and multi-site musculoskeletal pain (10 to 89%). Persistent LBP with co-occurring pain was reported more often by females than males, and co-occurring pain was reported more often in patients with more disability. Conclusions People with persistent LBP often report co-occurring neck pain, extremity pain or multi-site pain. Assessment of co-occurring pain alongside persistent LBP vary considerable between studies and there is a need for harmonisation of measurement methods to advance our understanding of how pain in different body regions occur alongside persistent LBP. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42017068807.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document