scholarly journals Timing is money: The factor timing ability of hedge fund managers

Author(s):  
Albert Jakob Osinga ◽  
Marc B.J. Schauten ◽  
Remco C.J. Zwinkels
Author(s):  
Bart Osinga ◽  
Marc Schauten ◽  
Remco C. J. Zwinkels

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1991-2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Smith ◽  
Na Wang ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Edward J. Zychowicz

This article presents a unique test of the effectiveness of technical analysis in different sentiment environments by focusing on its usage by perhaps the most sophisticated and astute investors, namely, hedge fund managers. We document that during high-sentiment periods, hedge funds using technical analysis exhibit higher performance, lower risk, and superior market-timing ability than nonusers. The advantages of using technical analysis disappear or even reverse in low-sentiment periods. Our findings are consistent with the view that technical analysis is relatively more useful in high-sentiment periods with larger mispricing, which cannot be fully exploited by arbitrage activities because of short-sale impediments.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George J. Jiang ◽  
Bing Liang ◽  
Huacheng Zhang

Using a novel style identification procedure, we show that style-shifting is a dynamic strategy commonly used by hedge fund managers. Three quarters of hedge funds shifted their investment styles at least once over the period from January 1994 to December 2013. We perform empirical tests of two hypotheses for the motivations of hedge fund style-shifting, namely backward-looking and forward-looking hypotheses. We find no evidence that style-shifting funds are backward-looking. Instead, we show evidence that managers of style-shifting funds exhibit both style-timing ability and the skill of generating abnormal returns in new styles. The new styles that hedge funds shift to on average outperform their old styles by 0.76% and style-shifting funds on average outperform their new style benchmark by 1.10% over the subsequent 12-month horizon. Finally, we show that small funds, winner funds, and funds with net inflows are more likely to shift styles. This paper was accepted by David Simchi-Levi, finance.


CFA Digest ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 11-13
Author(s):  
Keith H. Black
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Istvan Nagy ◽  
Ivan Guidotti
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 35-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Li ◽  
A. Steven Holland ◽  
Hossein B. Kazemi

2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 1887-1919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Cassar ◽  
Joseph Gerakos

ABSTRACT: We investigate the determinants of hedge fund internal controls and their association with the fees that funds charge investors. Hedge funds are subject to minimal regulation. Hence, hedge fund managers voluntarily implement internal controls, and managers and investors freely contract on fees. We find that internal controls are stronger in funds with higher potential agency costs. Further, internal controls are stronger in funds domiciled in jurisdictions that provide investors with limited legal redress for fraud and financial misstatements. Short selling funds, however, are more likely to protect information about their investment positions by implementing weaker internal controls. With respect to fees, we find that the percentage of positive profits that the manager receives increases in the strength of the fund’s internal controls. Finally, removing the manager from setting and reporting the fund’s official net asset value, along with reputational incentives and monitoring by leverage providers, are all associated with lower likelihoods of future regulatory investigations of fraud and/or financial misstatement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document